Literature DB >> 30664108

Principal Component Analysis of the Biomechanical Factors Associated With Performance During Cutting.

Neil Welch1,2,3, Chris Richter1,2, Andy Franklyn-Miller1,4, Kieran Moran2,3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Welch, N, Richter, C, Franklyn-Miller, A, and Moran, K. Principal component analysis of the biomechanical factors associated with performance during cutting. J Strength Cond Res 35(6): 1715-1723, 2021-The main aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between kinematic variables in cutting and performance outcome across different angled cuts through the use of principal component analysis and permutation testing. Twenty-five male intercounty Gaelic football players (23.5 ± 4.2 years, 183 ± 6 cm, and 83 ± 6.9 kg) participated in the study. Three-dimensional motion capture was used to perform a biomechanical analysis of 110 and 45° cutting tasks. Principal component analysis and permutation testing revealed one principal component within the 45° cut (r = 0.26) and 2 principal components within the 110° (r = 0.66 and 0.27) cut that consistently correlated with performance outcome. Within the 45° cut, the identified principal component was interpreted as relating to performance cues of maintaining a low center of mass during the concentric phase, using a shorter ground contact time, resisting a reduction in lateral center of mass to ankle and knee distance in the eccentric phase, and using faster and larger extensions of the hip and knee. Within the 110° cut, the first identified principal component was interpreted as relating to performance cues of maintaining a low center of mass during the concentric phase, using a shorter ground contact time, resisting a reduction in lateral center of mass to ankle and knee distance in the eccentric phase, and resisting hip flexion then using hip extension. The second principal component was interpreted as relating to a performance cue of leaning in the direction of the cut.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 30664108     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Approach Distance and Change of Direction Angles Upon Step and Joint Kinematics, Peak Muscle Activation, and Change of Direction Performance.

Authors:  Hallvard Nygaard Falch; Håvard Guldteig Rædergård; Roland van den Tillaar
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  A Systematic Review of Methods and Criteria Standard Proposal for the Use of Principal Component Analysis in Team's Sports Science.

Authors:  Daniel Rojas-Valverde; José Pino-Ortega; Carlos D Gómez-Carmona; Markel Rico-González
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Alternatives to common approaches for training change of direction performance: a scoping review.

Authors:  Robert Buhmann; Max Stuelcken; Mark Sayers
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-03

Review 4.  Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Performance Requirements of Horizontal Deceleration: A Review with Implications for Random Intermittent Multi-Directional Sports.

Authors:  Damian J Harper; Alistair J McBurnie; Thomas Dos' Santos; Ola Eriksrud; Martin Evans; Daniel D Cohen; David Rhodes; Christopher Carling; John Kiely
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Biomechanical Determinants of Performance and Injury Risk During Cutting: A Performance-Injury Conflict?

Authors:  Thomas Dos'Santos; Christopher Thomas; Alistair McBurnie; Paul Comfort; Paul A Jones
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 11.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.