| Literature DB >> 30663993 |
James McAvoy1, Richard Jaffe1, John Brock-Utne1, Jaime López2, Jessica Brodt3.
Abstract
Cerebral oximetry is commonly being advocated as a monitor for regional cerebral tissue oxygenation during cardiac surgery. We have increasing concern about the accuracy of this monitor, including the current systems entering the market, with new probes and algorithms. We present 2 cases where cerebral oximetry failed to accurately portray cerebral oxygenation. In the current form, cerebral oximetry may at best be an expensive tool without any benefit on outcomes. In addition, it may contribute to misleading and confusing clinical data.Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30663993 DOI: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000963
Source DB: PubMed Journal: A A Pract ISSN: 2575-3126