Literature DB >> 30663805

Progression with clinical features is associated with worse subsequent survival in multiple myeloma.

Rajshekhar Chakraborty1, Hien D Liu2, Lisa Rybicki1, Jacqulyn Tomer1, Jack Khouri1, Robert M Dean1, Beth M Faiman1, Matt Kalaycio1, Christy J Samaras1, Navneet S Majhail1, Jason Valent1.   

Abstract

Response rate and survival in multiple myeloma (MM) has improved in the era of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. However, most patients eventually relapse with biochemical progression (BP) alone or with clinical features of end-organ damage (CP: clinical progression), without or without extramedullary (EM) disease. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 252 patients with MM experiencing first relapse (time, T0 ) to evaluate survival following CP with and without EM as a function of BP. Patients were divided into three groups: BP (n = 134; 53%), CP/EM- (n = 87; 35%) and CP/EM+ (n = 31; 12%). The median time from diagnosis to T0 was significantly shorter in CP/EM+ compared to CP/EM- and BP groups (13 vs 25 vs 25 months; P < 0.001). The incidence of abnormal metaphase cytogenetics at diagnosis was significantly higher in CP/EM+ compared to CP/EM- and BP groups (46% vs 18% vs 11% respectively; P < 0.001). At a median follow-up of 26 months from T0 , median overall survival was 50, 19 and 10 months for BP, CP/EM- and CP/EM+ groups, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, pattern of progression was a significant prognostic factor for OS (HR for CP/EM- vs BP: 3.6; CP/EM+ vs BP: 8.7 and CP/EM+ vs CP/EM-: 2.42; P < 0.001 for all comparisons), along with age at T0 . In conclusion, progression pattern is an important prognostic factor in the current era, with subsequent survival being dismal in patients with end-organ damage or EM disease at relapse. Clinical trials in relapsed MM should consider reporting patterns of progression at baseline to ensure balance between study arms.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30663805     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  4 in total

Review 1.  Current Approach to Managing Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Naimisha Marneni; Rajshekhar Chakraborty
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Management of Multiple Myeloma in the Middle East: Unmet Needs, Challenges and Perspective.

Authors:  Ahmad Ibrahim; Nabil Chamseddine; Jean El-Cheikh; Colette Hanna; Walid Moukadem; Fady Nasr; Ahmad Younis; Ali Bazarbachi
Journal:  Clin Hematol Int       Date:  2022-08-30

Review 3.  Gaps and opportunities in the treatment of relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma: Consensus recommendations of the NCI Multiple Myeloma Steering Committee.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Lawrence Baizer; Natalie S Callander; Sergio A Giralt; Jens Hillengass; Boris Freidlin; Antje Hoering; Paul G Richardson; Elena I Schwartz; Anthony Reiman; Suzanne Lentzsch; Philip L McCarthy; Sundar Jagannath; Andrew J Yee; Richard F Little; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 9.812

4.  Daratumumab as Single Agent in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients: A Retrospective Real-Life Survey.

Authors:  Uros Markovic; Alessandra Romano; Vittorio Del Fabro; Claudia Bellofiore; Anna Bulla; Marina Silvia Parisi; Salvatore Leotta; Massimo Gentile; Clotilde Cangialosi; Iolanda Vincelli; Giuseppe Mineo; Marco Rossi; Massimo Poidomani; Giuseppina Uccello; Cinzia Maugeri; Donato Mannina; Vanessa Innao; Francesco Di Raimondo; Concetta Conticello
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.