Literature DB >> 30663704

Novel Process for 3D Printing Decellularized Matrices.

Stacey M S Gruber1, Paulomi Ghosh2, Karl Wilhelm Mueller2, Patrick W Whitlock3, Chia-Ying Lin4.   

Abstract

3D bioprinting aims to create custom scaffolds that are biologically active and accommodate the desired size and geometry. A thermoplastic backbone can provide mechanical stability similar to native tissue while biologic agents offer compositional cues to progenitor cells, leading to their migration, proliferation, and differentiation to reconstitute the original tissues/organs1 , 2. Unfortunately, many 3D printing compatible, bioresorbable polymers (such as polylactic acid, PLA) are printed at temperatures of 210 °C or higher - temperatures that are detrimental to biologics. On the other hand, polycaprolactone (PCL), a different type of polyester, is a bioresorbable, 3D printable material that has a gentler printing temperature of 65 °C. Therefore, it was hypothesized that decellularized extracellular matrix (DM) contained within a thermally protective PLA barrier could be printed within PCL filament and remain in its functional conformation. In this work, osteochondral repair was the application for which the hypothesis was tested. As such, porcine cartilage was decellularized and encapsulated in polylactic acid (PLA) microspheres which were then extruded with polycaprolactone (PCL) into filament to produce 3D constructs via fused deposition modeling. The constructs with or without the microspheres (PLA-DM/PCL and PCL(-), respectively) were evaluated for differences in surface features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30663704      PMCID: PMC8667568          DOI: 10.3791/58720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  21 in total

1.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage.

Authors:  D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Interbody fusion cage design using integrated global layout and local microstructure topology optimization.

Authors:  Chia-Ying Lin; Chun-Ching Hsiao; Po-Quan Chen; Scott J Hollister
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  A naturally derived, cytocompatible, and architecturally optimized scaffold for tendon and ligament regeneration.

Authors:  Patrick W Whitlock; Thomas L Smith; Gary G Poehling; Jeffrey S Shilt; Mark Van Dyke
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Porous biodegradable lumbar interbody fusion cage design and fabrication using integrated global-local topology optimization with laser sintering.

Authors:  Heesuk Kang; Scott J Hollister; Frank La Marca; Paul Park; Chia-Ying Lin
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Bioactive Microsphere-Based Scaffolds Containing Decellularized Cartilage.

Authors:  Amanda J Sutherland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 4.979

6.  Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering.

Authors:  Jessica M Williams; Adebisi Adewunmi; Rachel M Schek; Colleen L Flanagan; Paul H Krebsbach; Stephen E Feinberg; Scott J Hollister; Suman Das
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-01-23       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Extracellular matrix scaffolds for cartilage and bone regeneration.

Authors:  Kim E M Benders; P René van Weeren; Stephen F Badylak; Daniël B F Saris; Wouter J A Dhert; Jos Malda
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 19.536

8.  Tissue-Derived Extracellular Matrix Bioscaffolds: Emerging Applications in Cartilage and Meniscus Repair.

Authors:  Farrah A Monibi; James L Cook
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Microspheres containing decellularized cartilage induce chondrogenesis in vitro and remain functional after incorporation within a poly(caprolactone) filament useful for fabricating a 3D scaffold.

Authors:  Paulomi Ghosh; Stacey M S Gruber; Chia-Ying Lin; Patrick W Whitlock
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 9.954

10.  The effect of interface microstructure on interfacial shear strength for osteochondral scaffolds based on biomimetic design and 3D printing.

Authors:  Weijie Zhang; Qin Lian; Dichen Li; Kunzheng Wang; Dingjun Hao; Weiguo Bian; Zhongmin Jin
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 7.328

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Biomaterials and biotechnology for periodontal tissue regeneration: Recent advances and perspectives.

Authors:  Rong Deng; Yuzheng Xie; Unman Chan; Tao Xu; Yue Huang
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2022-05-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.