Literature DB >> 30663160

Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the differentiation of benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.

Young Jin Choi1,2, In Sook Lee2,3, You Seon Song2,3, Jeung Il Kim2,4, Kyung-Un Choi2,5, Jong Woon Song6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A wide range of specificity values for the differentiation of benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors show the limitations of conventional MRI features. The data obtained by quantitative analysis of diffusion-weighted image (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRIs would provide more objective results, especially in terms of cellularity and perfusion.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic efficacies of DWI and DCE MRI for the differentiation of malignant and benign soft-tissue tumors. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
SUBJECTS: In all, 136 patients (68 females, 68 males; age range 18-86 years, mean age 57.2 years) with soft-tissue tumors. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T, DWI, DCE. ASSESSMENT: Tumor sizes, margins, locations, the presence of involvement in bone or neurovascular bundle, peritumoral edema, heterogeneity, and tumor necrosis were investigated on conventional MR images. On DWIs, visual signal drops were assessed and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) values were measured. Ktrans , Kep , Ve , and iAUC values, and time-concentration curve (TCC) types were determined using DCE images. STATISTICAL TESTS: The data were statistically analyzed to determine the abilities to differentiate benign and malignant tumors using the chi-square test, two-sample t-test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-three cases were malignant and 63 benign. Age (mean ages of benign/malignant tumors, 51.75/61.86 years; P = 0.0002) and gender (F:M = 40:23 [benign], F:M = 28:45 [malignant], P = 0.003) influenced the distinction between benign and malignant. Sizes, margins, neurovascular bundle involvement, peritumoral edema, and heterogeneity of the tumors on conventional MR images and DCE parameters (Ktrans , Kep , Ve , and iAUC, and TCC plots) obtained from focal region of interest within a narrow volume of interest significantly differentiated benign and malignant lesions (all P < 0.0001, except Ve [P = 0.0004]). For DWI with ADC mapping, all ADC values and visually signal drops were also significant (P < 0.0001). DATA
CONCLUSION: DWI and DCE-MRI and derived variables were significantly helpful in discriminating benign and malignant soft-tissue tumors complementary to conventional MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:798-809.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC value; DCE-MRI; diffusion weighted imaging; quantitative parameters; soft tissue neoplasm

Year:  2019        PMID: 30663160     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of giant cell tumors by diffusion weighted imaging-fractional ADC analysis.

Authors:  Oganes Ashikyan; M Chalian; D Moore; Y Xi; P Pezeshk; A Chhabra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Description of the MRI and ultrasound imaging features of giant epidermal cysts.

Authors:  Ian Pressney; Michael Khoo; Rikin Hargunani; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram from T1W, T1CE, and T2FS MRI for Improving Diagnosis of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Zhibin Yue; Xiaoyu Wang; Yan Wang; Hongbo Wang; Wenyan Jiang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.484

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion MRI for differentiating Benign and Malignant Nonfatty Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Xinguang Xiao; Yanchang Liang; Hao Wen; Xiaopeng Wen; Meilan Gu; Cuiping Ren; Kunbin Li; Liangwen Yu; Liming Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  PET/MR Imaging of Somatostatin Receptor Expression and Tumor Vascularity in Meningioma: Implications for Pathophysiology and Tumor Outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle Roytman; Sean Kim; Shannon Glynn; Charlene Thomas; Eaton Lin; Whitney Feltus; Rajiv S Magge; Benjamin Liechty; Theodore H Schwartz; Rohan Ramakrishna; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Susan C Pannullo; Joseph R Osborne; Jonathan P S Knisely; Jana Ivanidze
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Soft tissue sarcoma: correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features with HIF-1α expression and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Xiangwen Li; Yuxue Xie; Hongyue Tao; Shuang Chen; Yiwen Hu; Rong Lu; Qing Li; Bo Xiong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-10

7.  Myxomas and myxoid liposarcomas of the extremities: Our preliminary findings in conventional, perfusion, and diffusion magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Luz M Morán; Jesús Vega; Nieves Gómez-León; Ana Royuela
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2022-10-07

8.  A review of paediatric soft tissues masses referred to a tertiary musculoskeletal sarcoma centre.

Authors:  Catriona Reid; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 9.  Telangiectatic soft tissue sarcoma and chronic expanding haematoma: a comparative review of MRI features.

Authors:  William Tilden; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.