BACKGROUND: Although radiation therapy (RT) contributes to survival benefit in many brain tumor patients, it has also been associated with long-term brain injury. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) represent an important manifestation of radiation-related injury. PURPOSE: To characterize the change in size and number of CMBs over time and to evaluate their relationship to white matter structural integrity as measured using diffusion MRI indices. STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal, retrospective, human cohort. POPULATION: In all, 113 brain tumor patients including patients treated with focal RT (n = 91, 80.5%) and a subset of nonirradiated controls (n = 22, 19.5%). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Single and multiecho susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and multiband, shell, and direction diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at 7 T. ASSESSMENT: Patients were scanned either once or serially. CMBs were detected and quantified on SWI images using a semiautomated approach. Local and global fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured from DTI data for a subset of 35 patients. STATISTICAL TESTS: Potential risk factors for CMB development were determined by multivariate linear regression and using linear mixed-effect models. Longitudinal FA was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated for trends. RESULTS: All patients scanned at 1 or more years post-RT had CMBs. A history of multiple surgical resections was a risk factor for development of CMBs. The total number and volume of CMBs increased by 18% and 11% per year, respectively, although individual CMBs decreased in volume over time. Simultaneous to these microvascular changes, FA decreased by a median of 6.5% per year. While the majority of nonirradiated controls had no CMBs, four control patients presented with fewer than five CMBs. DATA CONCLUSION: Identifying patients who are at the greatest risk for CMB development, with its likely associated long-term cognitive impairment, is an important step towards developing and piloting preventative and/or rehabilitative measures for patients undergoing RT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:868-877.
BACKGROUND: Although radiation therapy (RT) contributes to survival benefit in many brain tumorpatients, it has also been associated with long-term brain injury. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) represent an important manifestation of radiation-related injury. PURPOSE: To characterize the change in size and number of CMBs over time and to evaluate their relationship to white matter structural integrity as measured using diffusion MRI indices. STUDY TYPE: Longitudinal, retrospective, human cohort. POPULATION: In all, 113 brain tumorpatients including patients treated with focal RT (n = 91, 80.5%) and a subset of nonirradiated controls (n = 22, 19.5%). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Single and multiecho susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and multiband, shell, and direction diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at 7 T. ASSESSMENT: Patients were scanned either once or serially. CMBs were detected and quantified on SWI images using a semiautomated approach. Local and global fractional anisotropy (FA) were measured from DTI data for a subset of 35 patients. STATISTICAL TESTS: Potential risk factors for CMB development were determined by multivariate linear regression and using linear mixed-effect models. Longitudinal FA was quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated for trends. RESULTS: All patients scanned at 1 or more years post-RT had CMBs. A history of multiple surgical resections was a risk factor for development of CMBs. The total number and volume of CMBs increased by 18% and 11% per year, respectively, although individual CMBs decreased in volume over time. Simultaneous to these microvascular changes, FA decreased by a median of 6.5% per year. While the majority of nonirradiated controls had no CMBs, four control patients presented with fewer than five CMBs. DATA CONCLUSION: Identifying patients who are at the greatest risk for CMB development, with its likely associated long-term cognitive impairment, is an important step towards developing and piloting preventative and/or rehabilitative measures for patients undergoing RT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:868-877.
Authors: Kristen W Yeom; Robert M Lober; Sonia Partap; Nicholas Telischak; Rachel Tsolinas; Patrick D Barnes; Michael S B Edwards Journal: J Neurosurg Pediatr Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Janine M Lupo; Cynthia F Chuang; Susan M Chang; Igor J Barani; Bert Jimenez; Christopher P Hess; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M M F Poels; M A Ikram; A van der Lugt; A Hofman; W J Niessen; G P Krestin; M M B Breteler; M W Vernooij Journal: Neurology Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Edward A Monaco; Amir H Faraji; Oren Berkowitz; Phillip V Parry; Uri Hadelsberg; Hideyuki Kano; Ajay Niranjan; Douglas Kondziolka; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Janine M Lupo; Suchandrima Banerjee; Kathryn E Hammond; Douglas A C Kelley; Duan Xu; Susan M Chang; Daniel B Vigneron; Sharmila Majumdar; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-09-26 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Vijaya Nagesh; Christina I Tsien; Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junick; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dana Greene-Schloesser; Mike E Robbins; Ann M Peiffer; Edward G Shaw; Kenneth T Wheeler; Michael D Chan Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Rachel N Andrews; Ethan G Bloomer; John D Olson; David B Hanbury; Gregory O Dugan; Christopher T Whitlow; J Mark Cline Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Cassie Kline; Schuyler Stoller; Lennox Byer; David Samuel; Janine M Lupo; Melanie A Morrison; Andreas M Rauschecker; Pierre Nedelec; Walter Faig; Dena B Dubal; Heather J Fullerton; Sabine Mueller Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Tiina Maria Remes; Maria Helena Suo-Palosaari; Päivi K T Koskenkorva; Anna K Sutela; Sanna-Maria Toiviainen-Salo; Pekka M Arikoski; Mikko O Arola; Vesa-Pekka Heikkilä; Mika Kapanen; Päivi Maria Lähteenmäki; Tuula R I Lönnqvist; Hannele Niiniviita; Tytti M-L Pokka; Liisa Porra; V Pekka Riikonen; Jan Seppälä; Kirsti H Sirkiä; Antti Vanhanen; Heikki M J Rantala; Arja H Harila-Saari; Marja K Ojaniemi Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2020-02-07
Authors: Sivakami Avadiappan; Melanie A Morrison; Angela Jakary; Erin Felton; Schuyler Stoller; Christopher P Hess; Annette M Molinaro; Steve E Braunstein; Sabine Mueller; Janine M Lupo Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Nichola Cooper; Melanie A Morrison; Camelia Vladescu; Alice C J Hart; Deena Paul; Amna Malik; Thomas Young; Asad Luqmani; Maria Atta; David J Sharp; James B Bussel; Adam D Waldman Journal: Blood Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Nicholas S Phillips; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Bogdan G Mitrea; Jason Yan; Chenghong Li; Matthew A Scoggins; Thomas E Merchant; Gregory T Armstrong; Deokumar Srivastava; Ching-Hon Pui; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Kevin R Krull; Noah D Sabin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-20 Impact factor: 4.379