Literature DB >> 30663132

Accounting for a decaying correlation structure in cluster randomized trials with continuous recruitment.

Kelsey L Grantham1, Jessica Kasza1, Stephane Heritier1, Karla Hemming2, Andrew B Forbes1.   

Abstract

A requirement for calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials (CRTs) conducted over multiple periods of time is the specification of a form for the correlation between outcomes of subjects within the same cluster, encoded via the within-cluster correlation structure. Previously proposed within-cluster correlation structures have made strong assumptions; for example, the usual assumption is that correlations between the outcomes of all pairs of subjects are identical ("uniform correlation"). More recently, structures that allow for a decay in correlation between pairs of outcomes measured in different periods have been suggested. However, these structures are overly simple in settings with continuous recruitment and measurement. We propose a more realistic "continuous-time correlation decay" structure whereby correlations between subjects' outcomes decay as the time between these subjects' measurement times increases. We investigate the use of this structure on trial planning in the context of a primary care diabetes trial, where there is evidence of decaying correlation between pairs of patients' outcomes over time. In particular, for a range of different trial designs, we derive the variance of the treatment effect estimator under continuous-time correlation decay and compare this to the variance obtained under uniform correlation. For stepped wedge and cluster randomized crossover designs, incorrectly assuming uniform correlation will underestimate the required sample size under most trial configurations likely to occur in practice. Planning of CRTs requires consideration of the most appropriate within-cluster correlation structure to obtain a suitable sample size.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial design; cluster randomized trial; crossover design; sample size; stepped wedge design; within-cluster correlation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30663132     DOI: 10.1002/sim.8089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  Power calculation for analyses of cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes via generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Linda J Harrison; Rui Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials in the presence of a time-varying treatment effect.

Authors:  Avi Kenny; Emily C Voldal; Fan Xia; Patrick J Heagerty; James P Hughes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 3.  Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Methodological Overview.

Authors:  Fan Li; Rui Wang
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.210

4.  Design and analysis considerations for cohort stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a decay correlation structure.

Authors:  Fan Li
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Marginal modeling of cluster-period means and intraclass correlations in stepped wedge designs with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Hengshi Yu; Paul J Rathouz; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.279

6.  Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  Kelsey L Grantham; Jessica Kasza; Stephane Heritier; John B Carlin; Andrew B Forbes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Jessica Kasza; Richard Hooper; Andrew Copas; Andrew B Forbes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator.

Authors:  Karla Hemming; Jessica Kasza; Richard Hooper; Andrew Forbes; Monica Taljaard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  The hunt for efficient, incomplete designs for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and continuous outcome measures.

Authors:  Richard Hooper; Jessica Kasza; Andrew Forbes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Optimal design of cluster randomised trials with continuous recruitment and prospective baseline period.

Authors:  Richard Hooper; Andrew J Copas
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.