Literature DB >> 30661671

Is phase angle an appropriate indicator of malnutrition in different disease states? A systematic review.

Sylvia Rinaldi1, Jason Gilliland2, Colleen O'Connor3, Bert Chesworth4, Janet Madill3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) classifies malnutrition severity via a simple bedside assessment. Phase angle (PhA) is an indicator of cell integrity and has been suggested to be indicator of nutritional status.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between PhA and SGA.
METHODS: Relevant studies published through October 31, 2017 were identified using 7 electronic databases. Articles were included for review if they included comparison data between SGA and PhA within adult disease populations. Evidence quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines and methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.
RESULTS: 33 articles within four disease states (liver, hospitalization, oncology and renal) met inclusion criteria for review. Results were limited by restricting the database search to articles published in English only, and by the inherent difficulty of comparing 2 methods which are both influenced by the operator.
CONCLUSION: Based on GRADE guidelines, evidence quality received a grade of Low. Based on QUADAS-2, 61% of studies had high risk of bias in the index test (PhA), while all other domains had low risk. It is not possible to conclude that PhA is an accurate independent indicator of malnutrition. PROSPERO no. CRD42016050876.
Copyright © 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease; Hospitalized; Liver; Malnutrition; Oncology; Phase angle; Renal; Subjective global assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30661671     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN        ISSN: 2405-4577


  6 in total

1.  Phase Angle Is a Stronger Predictor of Hospital Outcome than Subjective Global Assessment-Results from the Prospective Dessau Hospital Malnutrition Study.

Authors:  Mathias Plauth; Isabella Sulz; Melanie Viertel; Veronika Höfer; Mila Witt; Frank Raddatz; Michael Reich; Michael Hiesmayr; Peter Bauer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Malnutrition-Inflammation Score VS Phase Angle in the Era of GLIM Criteria: A Cross-Sectional Study among Hemodialysis Patients in UAE.

Authors:  Mirey Karavetian; Nada Salhab; Rana Rizk; Kalliopi Anna Poulia
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Identification of Sarcopenic Obesity in German Nursing Home Residents-The Role of Body Composition and Malnutrition in the BaSAlt Cohort-Study.

Authors:  Daniel Haigis; Leon Matting; Silas Wagner; Gorden Sudeck; Annika Frahsa; Ansgar Thiel; Gerhard Eschweiler; Andreas Michael Nieß
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Standardized Phase Angle for Predicting Nutritional Status of Hemodialysis Patients in the Early Period After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Diana Sukackiene; Laurynas Rimsevicius; Marius Miglinas
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-16

5.  Muscular Ultrasonography in Morphofunctional Assessment of Patients with Oncological Pathology at Risk of Malnutrition.

Authors:  Juan J López-Gómez; Katia Benito-Sendín Plaar; Olatz Izaola-Jauregui; David Primo-Martín; Emilia Gómez-Hoyos; Beatriz Torres-Torres; Daniel A De Luis-Román
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 6.706

6.  The Association of Disease Activity, BMI and Phase Angle with Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with IBD.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Mentella; Franco Scaldaferri; Marco Pizzoferrato; Antonio Gasbarrini; Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.