Literature DB >> 30661625

Physical Activity and Risk of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 38 Cohort Studies in 45 Study Reports.

Xuyu Chen1, Qiru Wang1, Yanan Zhang1, Qian Xie1, Xiaodong Tan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and quantify the association between physical activity (PA) and risk of breast cancer.
METHODS: A systematic review meta-analysis was conducted. The literature was independently and manually searched by 2 reviewers through 3 English databases (PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Science) for data till October 2017. The quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Fixed-effects models were used to estimate the pooled relative risk and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Dose-response analysis was chosen for quantifying the association between PA and risk of breast cancer. The Begg test and the Egger test were used to estimate potential publication bias. Heterogeneity between studies was evaluated with I2 statistics.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 38 cohort studies published between 1994 and 2017, which included 68 416 breast cancer cases. The overall relative risk (ORR) for breast cancer was 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.90). The inverse association was consistent among all subgroup analyses. In subgroup analysis by menopausal status, the ORR of breast cancer was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87) for premenopausal status and 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.97) for postmenopausal status. In subgroup analysis by PA type, the ORR for total activity was 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), for recreational activity 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91), for occupational activity 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.99), and for nonoccupational activity 0.87 (95% CI 0.83-0.92). The risk of breast cancer was significantly lower in people with exposure periods longer than 1 year and less than 5 years (ORR 0.62; 95% CI 0.46-0.78), followed by those with lifetime activity (ORR 0.81; 95% CI 0.69-0.93). The ORR for subjects with body mass index of less than 25 kg/m2 (0.88; 95% CI 0.83-0.93) was close to that for subjects with body mass index of more than 25 kg/m2 (0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.97). A linear relationship was found between breast cancer risk and PA (recreational activity and total activity), and the ORR was reduced by 3% (95% CI 0.95-0.99) for every 10 metabolic equivalent of energy hours per week increment in recreational PA and by 2% (95% CI 0.97-0.99) for every 10 metabolic equivalent of energy hours per week increment in total PA.
CONCLUSIONS: PA is significantly associated with a decrease in the risk of breast cancer.
Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; meta-analysis; physical activity; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30661625     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  12 in total

1.  Physical activity from menarche-to-first pregnancy and risk of breast cancer: the California teachers study.

Authors:  Dan Lin; Ying Liu; Deirdre K Tobias; Kathleen Sturgeon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.532

Review 2.  Association between Physical Activity and Telomere Length in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jihee Min; Ji Young Kim; Ji Yeong Choi; In Deok Kong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Physical activity and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast, in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Rita Peila; Rowan T Chlebowski; Tarah J Ballinger; Victor Kamensky; Phyllis A Richey; Nazmus Saquib; Aladdin H Shadyab; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Thomas E Rohan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 9.685

4.  Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Transition and Health Consequences of Breast Cancer in the East Asia Region, From 1990 to 2019.

Authors:  Sumaira Mubarik; Jinhong Cao; Fang Wang; Syeda Rija Hussain; Qing Liu; Suqing Wang; Yan Liu; Chuanhua Yu
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-04-11

Review 5.  Cancer Progress and Priorities: Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Serena C Houghton; Susan E Hankinson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.090

6.  The Burden and Trends of Breast Cancer From 1990 to 2017 at the Global, Regional, and National Levels: Results From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.

Authors:  Peng Ji; Yue Gong; Ming-Liang Jin; Xin Hu; Gen-Hong Di; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  A Review of Modifiable Risk Factors in Young Women for the Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Alex A Daly; Rachel Rolph; Ramsey I Cutress; Ellen R Copson
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-04-13

8.  Factors for the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Jalal Poorolajal; Fatemeh Heidarimoghis; Manoochehr Karami; Zahra Cheraghi; Fatemeh Gohari-Ensaf; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Bushra Zareie; Pegah Ameri; Fatemeh Sahraee
Journal:  J Res Health Sci       Date:  2021-07-20

9.  Dose-response effects of aerobic exercise on adiposity markers in postmenopausal women: pooled analyses from two randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Paola Gonzalo-Encabo; Jessica McNeil; Alberto Pérez-López; David Valadés; Kerry S Courneya; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  Socio-demographic Determinants of Low Physical Activity in Peruvian Adults: Results of a Population-based Survey Performed in 2017-2018.

Authors:  Akram Hernández-Vásquez; Rodrigo Vargas-Fernández
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2021-11-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.