Literature DB >> 30661388

Evaluation of Linearity and Interference Effect on SMBG and POCT Devices, Showing Drastic High Values, Low Values, or Error Messages.

Shizuki Sai1, Mitsunori Urata2, Iwao Ogawa1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When a patient with diabetes measures blood glucose levels using a simple blood glucose meter, an error message or abnormal value may be displayed because of interfering substances, potentially leading to unnecessary medical treatment.
METHODS: Here, we tested 10 self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and point-of-care testing (POCT) devices to investigate under what conditions they fail to measure blood glucose levels or display abnormal values instead. We also evaluated the influence and linearity of several well-known interfering substances and hematocrit (Ht). Each adjusted sample was measured by each device twice and the values compared with the reference values.
RESULTS: Linearity was favorable in all but one model. The impact of the interfering substances and Ht has been confirmed in many SMBG and POCT devices. In particular, some models showed significant pseudo-high or -low levels for samples that contained ascorbic acid, which is used widely in infusion solutions. Three devices showed error messages to avoid presenting a false value.
CONCLUSIONS: Since pseudo-high levels may result in the excessive administration of insulin and lead to adverse events, this report serves as a critical reminder of the importance of device choice for specific indications. Three new devices have safety functions that prevent the showing of false values.

Entities:  

Keywords:  POCT; SMBG; abnormal results; hematocrit; interfering substances; linearity

Year:  2019        PMID: 30661388      PMCID: PMC6610602          DOI: 10.1177/1932296818821664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  6 in total

1.  Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ralph Ziegler; Bettina Heidtmann; Doerte Hilgard; Sabine Hofer; Joachim Rosenbauer; Reinhard Holl
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Careful readings for a flash glucose monitoring system in nondiabetic Japanese subjects: individual differences and discrepancy in glucose concentrarion after glucose loading [Rapid Communication].

Authors:  Keiko Sekido; Takashi Sekido; Atsuko Kaneko; Manami Hosokawa; Ai Sato; Yoshihiko Sato; Masanori Yamazaki; Mitsuhisa Komatsu
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 2.349

3.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) improves glycaemic control in oral hypoglycaemic agent (OHA)-treated type 2 diabetes (SMBG-OHA study).

Authors:  Shin-ichi Harashima; Toru Fukushima; Mayumi Sasaki; Yuichi Nishi; Shimpei Fujimoto; Masahito Ogura; Shunsuke Yamane; Daisuke Tanaka; Norio Harada; Akihiro Hamasaki; Kazuaki Nagashima; Yuko Nakahigashi; Yutaka Seino; Nobuya Inagaki
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.876

4.  Interference by pralidoxime (PAM) salts in clinical laboratory tests.

Authors:  Sumika Nagase; Katsunori Kohguchi; Kaoru Tohyama; Mikio Watanabe; Yoshinori Iwatani
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Evidence of a strong association between frequency of self-monitoring of blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in T1D exchange clinic registry participants.

Authors:  Kellee M Miller; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Robin S Goland; Michael J Haller; Janet B McGill; Henry Rodriguez; Jill H Simmons; Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Spurious elevation of glucose concentration during administration of high dose of ascorbic acid in a patient with type 2 diabetes on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Soo Kyoung Kim; Jong Ryeal Hahm; Ho-Su Kim; Sungsu Kim; Tae Sik Jung; Jung Hwa Jung; Hye Ryun Lee; Deok Ryong Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.759

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Interferences With CGM Systems: Practical Relevance?

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-15
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.