Literature DB >> 30661140

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: prevalence and medium term prognostic impact.

María Del Carmen León Del Pino1,2, Martín Ruíz Ortiz3, Mónica Delgado Ortega3, José Sánchez Fernández3, Carlos Ferreiro Quero3, Enrique Durán Jiménez3, Miguel Romero Moreno3, José Segura Saint-Gerons3, Soledad Ojeda Pineda3, Manuel Pan Álvarez-Ossorio3, Dolores Mesa Rubio3.   

Abstract

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) occurs when the effective orifice area of the prosthesis is too small in relation to the patient's body surface area. There are few data available on the frequency and prognostic impact of PPM after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of PPM and to investigate its association with medium-term clinical course of patients undergoing TAVI. We included 185 patients undergoing TAVI (79 ± 5 years, 49% male, 98% CoreValve) between April-2008 and December-2014. The effective orifice area (EOA) was determined by transthoracic echocardiography prior and after the procedure. We defined PPM as indexed EOA ≤ 0.85 cm2/m2 (severe PPM if ≤ 0.65 cm2/m2). All cause death, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure were considered as major clinical events. 45 patients (24%) showed PPM (severe 11 patients, 6%). PPM was associated with a higher EuroSCORE (OR 1.06, IC 95% 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03), body surface area ≥ 1.72 m2 (OR 3.58, IC 95% 1.30-9.87, p = 0.01) and small aortic annulus (OR 0.73, IC 95% 0.55-0.92, p = 0.03); and severe PPM with small prostheses size (OR 17.79, IC 95% 1.87-169.78, p = 0.012). The mean event-free survival was 34 ± 26 months. Patients with severe PPM showed lower rates of event free survival than the rest of the series (52% vs. 84%, p = 0.04) at 34 months follow up. In our series, PPM was present in a quarter of the patients after TAVI. Higher EuroSCORE, smaller prosthesis size, larger body surface area and smaller aortic annulus diameter were associated with PPM. Severe PPM was an independent factor associated with major events at medium-term follow up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CoreValve; Echocardiogram; Prosthesis-patient mismatch; Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30661140     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-01519-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  4 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Spiral CT 3D Reconstruction in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Kunpeng Zhang; Yan Gao; Junwei Lv; Jian Li; Jingli Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Impact of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on 1-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Meta-analysis of 71,106 Patients.

Authors:  Michel Pompeu Barros Oliveira Sá; Luiz Rafael Pereira Cavalcanti; Felipe Augusto Santos Sarargiotto; Álvaro Monteiro Perazzo; Sérgio da Costa Rayol; Roberto Gouveia Silva Diniz; Frederico Browne Correia Araújo Sá; Alexandre Motta Menezes; Ricardo Carvalho Lima
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-06-01

3.  Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR.

Authors:  Sabine Bleiziffer; Tanja K Rudolph
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-30

4.  Hemodynamic Performance of Two Current-Generation Transcatheter Heart Valve Prostheses in Severely Calcified Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Authors:  Max Potratz; Kawa Mohemed; Hazem Omran; Lasha Gortamashvili; Kai Peter Friedrichs; Werner Scholtz; Smita Scholtz; Volker Rudolph; Cornelia Piper; Tomasz Gilis-Januszewski; René Schramm; Nobuyuki Furukawa; Jan Gummert; Sabine Bleiziffer; Tanja Katharina Rudolph
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.