Literature DB >> 30660764

Sensorimotor Cortical Activity in Acute Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Wei-Ju Chang1, Valentina Buscemi1, Matthew B Liston2, James H McAuley3, Paul W Hodges4, Siobhan M Schabrun5.   

Abstract

Sensorimotor cortical activity is altered in both the immediate acute and chronic stages of musculoskeletal pain. However, these changes are opposite, with decreased cortical activity reported in experimentally induced acute pain (lasting minutes to hours), and increased cortical activity in chronic, clinical pain (lasting >6 months). It is unknown whether sensorimotor cortical activity is altered in acute, clinical musculoskeletal pain (lasting <4 weeks). In 36 individuals with acute, nonspecific, clinical low back pain (LBP) and 36 age- and sex-matched, pain-free controls, we investigated the processing of non-noxious afferent inputs using sensory evoked potentials (SEPs), as well as corticomotor excitability and organization of the primary motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Processing of non-noxious sensory inputs was lower (smaller area of the N80-N150-P260 SEP complex) in acute LBP (F1,70 = 45.28, P < .01). The examination of specific SEP components revealed a smaller area of the N150 and P260 SEP components in acute LBP, although interindividual variability was high. Motor cortical map volume was lower in acute LBP (F1,70 = 5.61, P = .02). These findings demonstrate that acute LBP is characterized by lower sensorimotor cortical activity at the group level. However, individual variation was high, suggesting individual adaptation of cortical plasticity in acute pain. PERSPECTIVE: This is the first study to examine sensorimotor cortical activity in the acute stage of clinical LBP. This information is critical for understanding the neurophysiology of acute LBP.
Copyright © 2019 the American Pain Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low back pain; primary motor cortex; primary sensory cortex; sensory evoked potentials; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30660764     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  8 in total

1.  Young adults with recurrent low back pain demonstrate altered trunk coordination during gait independent of pain status and attentional demands.

Authors:  Hai-Jung Steffi Shih; Carolee J Winstein; Kornelia Kulig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Genetic Taster Status as a Mediator of Neural Activity and Swallowing Mechanics in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Angela M Dietsch; Ross M Westemeyer; William G Pearson; Douglas H Schultz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Corticomotor reorganization during short-term visuomotor training in the lower back: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Rocco Cavaleri; Lucy S Chipchase; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Siobhan M Schabrun; Muath A Shraim; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Can training of a skilled pelvic movement change corticomotor control of back muscles? Comparison of single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Muath A Shraim; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Sauro E Salomoni; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.698

Review 5.  The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Nitika Kumari; Kelly Holt; Imran Khan Niazi; Imran Amjad; Amit N Pujari; Kemal Sitki Türker; Bernadette Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  The Potential Mechanisms of High-Velocity, Low-Amplitude, Controlled Vertebral Thrusts on Neuroimmune Function: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Heidi Haavik; Imran Khan Niazi; Nitika Kumari; Imran Amjad; Jenna Duehr; Kelly Holt
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  A novel cortical biomarker signature for predicting pain sensitivity: protocol for the PREDICT longitudinal analytical validation study.

Authors:  David A Seminowicz; Katarzyna Bilska; Nahian S Chowdhury; Patrick Skippen; Samantha K Millard; Alan K I Chiang; Shuo Chen; Andrew J Furman; Siobhan M Schabrun
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-07-27

8.  Is there a causal relationship between acute stage sensorimotor cortex activity and the development of chronic low back pain? a protocol and statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Luke Jenkins; Wei-Ju Chang; Valentina Buscemi; Chelsea Cunningham; Aidan Cashin; James H McAuley; Matthew Liston; Siobhan M Schabrun
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.