Literature DB >> 30660632

Feature contingencies when reading letter strings.

Daniel R Coates1, Jean-Baptiste Bernard2, Susana T L Chung3.   

Abstract

Many models posit the use of distinctive spatial features to recognize letters of the alphabet, a fundamental component of reading. It has also been hypothesized that when letters are in close proximity, visual crowding may cause features to mislocalize between nearby letters, causing identification errors. Here, we took a data-driven approach to investigate these aspects of textual processing. Using data collected from subjects identifying each letter in thousands of lower-case letter trigrams presented in the peripheral visual field, we found characteristic error patterns in the results suggestive of the use of particular spatial features. Distinctive features were seldom entirely missed, and we found evidence for errors due to doubling, masking, and migration of features. Dependencies both amongst neighboring letters and in the responses revealed the contingent nature of processing letter strings, challenging the most basic models of reading that ignore either crowding or featural decomposition.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Crowding; Feature migration; Letter recognition; Peripheral vision; Redundancy masking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30660632     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Spatial Attention Enhances Crowded Stimulus Encoding Across Modeled Receptive Fields by Increasing Redundancy of Feature Representations.

Authors:  Justin D Theiss; Joel D Bowen; Michael A Silver
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.026

2.  Hidden by bias: how standard psychophysical procedures conceal crucial aspects of peripheral visual appearance.

Authors:  Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Geometrically restricted image descriptors: A method to capture the appearance of shape.

Authors:  Natalia Melnik; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Atypical visual field asymmetries in redundancy masking.

Authors:  Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  Redundancy masking: The loss of repeated items in crowded peripheral vision.

Authors:  Fazilet Zeynep Yildirim; Daniel R Coates; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The generality of the critical spacing for crowded optotypes: From Bouma to the 21st century.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Charles J H Ludowici; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.