Literature DB >> 30660330

Clinical and pathologic findings of aortic dissection at autopsy: Review of 336 cases over nearly 6 decades.

Nick Huynh1, Sarah Thordsen2, Taylor Thomas3, Shannon M Mackey-Bojack4, Emily R Duncanson5, Darlington Nwuado6, Ross F Garberich7, Kevin M Harris8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize the clinical and pathologic findings of aortic dissection (AD) over a nearly 60-year period.
METHODS: The Jesse E. Edwards Registry of Cardiovascular Disease database was queried for cardiac specimens from autopsies with AD as a diagnosis and compared 2 cohorts: early (1956-1992) and current (1993-2015).
RESULTS: From 1956 to 2015, 338 cases (166 early, 170 current) with AD were included (mean age: 60; 62% male). The AD was 86% type A and 14% type B. Sixty-two percent of cases were under medical care at time of death (61% early, 62% current, P = not significant). Of those under medical care, 63% were not diagnosed prior to death (64% early, 62% current, P = not significant). Risks for dissection did not differ between time intervals and include left ventricular hypertrophy, suggestive of hypertension (84%), prior cardiovascular surgery (38%), bicuspid valve (14%), and connective tissue disease (9%). An intimal tear was identified in the ascending aorta in the majority (68%), followed by descending (14%), root (9.5%), and arch (7%). Aortic rupture occurred in 58%, most frequently in the ascending aorta (41%).
CONCLUSIONS: In a large cardiovascular registry, >60% of cases of AD were not detected clinically and first identified at autopsy. Although diagnostic techniques have significantly improved over the time interval, the percentage of AD discovered at autopsy did not differ from the early to the current era. The most prevalent risk factors for dissection including hypertension and prior cardiovascular surgery remain similar in both time periods. AD death is related to rupture of the aorta in the majority of cases.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30660330     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  6 in total

1.  "More or less": management of type A aortic dissections in the endovascular era.

Authors:  Thodur M Vasudevan; Yogeesan Sivakumaran
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-03-11

2.  Incidental Finding of an Extensive Type B Aortic Dissection Extending to the Iliac Arteries.

Authors:  Eric Landa; Saad Javaid; Frederick Campos; Erika Vigandt; Murtaza Hussaini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-27

3.  Left Ventricular Concentric Geometric Patterns Are Associated With Worse Prognosis Among Patients With Type-A Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Walter E M Rocha; Matheus F R A Oliveira; Julia D Soares; Victor M F S L'Armée; Mayara P G Martins; Aloísio M Rocha; Audes D M Feitosa; Ricardo C Lima; Pedro P M Oliveira; Lindemberg M Silveira-Filho; Otavio R Coelho-Filho; José R Matos-Souza; Orlando Petrucci; Andrei C Sposito; Wilson Nadruz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Chronobiological patterns of acute aortic dissection in central China.

Authors:  Liangtao Xia; Lu Huang; Xin Feng; Jiewen Xiao; Xiang Wei; Xinyu Yu
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Left ventricular hypertrophy and sudden cardiac death.

Authors:  Grigorios Giamouzis; Apostolos Dimos; Andrew Xanthopoulos; John Skoularigis; Filippos Triposkiadis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Incidence and natural history of isolated abdominal aortic dissection: A population-based assessment from 1995 to 2015.

Authors:  Indrani Sen; Mario D'Oria; Salome Weiss; Thomas C Bower; Gustavo S Oderich; Manju Kalra; Jill Colglazier; Randall R DeMartino
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 4.860

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.