Literature DB >> 30659908

Associations between cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening uptake, chronic diseases and health-related behaviours: Data from the Italian PASSI nationwide surveillance.

Francesco Venturelli1, Letizia Sampaolo2, Giuliano Carrozzi3, Marco Zappa4, Paolo Giorgi Rossi5.   

Abstract

Screening programmes have been proposed as a privileged setting for health promotion interventions. We aim to assess the associations between behavioural risk factors, chronic conditions and diseases and cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening uptake. Secondly, we aim to assess whether these associations are due to underlying differences in socioeconomic characteristics. In Italy, a random sample was interviewed by the PASSI surveillance (106,000 interviews) in 2014-2016. Screening uptake adjusted for age and gender alone and for age, gender and socioeconomic characteristics (educational attainment and self-reported economic difficulties) were estimated using multivariate Poisson regression models. Screening uptake was 79%, 73% and 45% for cervical (age 25-64), breast (women aged 50-69) and colorectal cancer (both sexes age 50-69), respectively. People with low consumption of vegetables and fruits and those with insufficient physical activity had lower uptake than people with healthy behaviours (20-22% and 8-15% lower, respectively), as did those obese and diabetic compared to healthier people (7-10% and 5-8% lower, respectively). Those with high-risk drinking behaviour, self-reported driving after drinking alcohol, and former smokers had higher screening uptake (3-7%, 3-6%, and 7-14% higher, respectively). Differences in uptake decreased after adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics, but trends were unvaried. In conclusion, screening uptake is negatively associated with unfavourable behaviours and health conditions that are also risk factors for breast and colorectal cancer incidence. Socioeconomic characteristics do not fully explain these differences. Health promotion interventions targeting diet and physical activity nested in screening programmes might miss part of the at-risk population.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral risk Factor Surveillance System; Mass screening; Public health; Secondary prevention; Socioeconomic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30659908     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  4 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach.

Authors:  Sharifah Saffinas Syed Soffian; Azmawati Mohammed Nawi; Rozita Hod; Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf; Huan-Keat Chan; Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Trends and Determinants in Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Spain: An Analysis of National Surveys from 2017 and 2020.

Authors:  Silvia Portero de la Cruz; Jesús Cebrino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Colorectal cancer screening by fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy in France: how many people are actually covered? Focus on the Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region.

Authors:  Jean-François Seitz; David Lapalus; Sylvie Arlotto; Stéphanie Gentile; Florence Ettori; Yves Rinaldi; Philippe Grandval; Patrick Delasalle
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  Wealth-related inequalities of women's knowledge of cervical cancer screening and service utilisation in 18 resource-constrained countries: evidence from a pooled decomposition analysis.

Authors:  Rashidul Alam Mahumud; Syed Afroz Keramat; Gail M Ormsby; Marufa Sultana; Lal B Rawal; Khorshed Alam; Jeff Gow; Andre M N Renzaho
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2020-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.