| Literature DB >> 30659415 |
Elias Kikano1, Nils Grosse Hokamp2,3, Leslie Ciancibello2, Nikhil Ramaiya2, Christos Kosmas2, Amit Gupta2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: One of the key steps in generating three-dimensional (3D) printed models in medicine is segmentation of radiologic imaging. The software tools used for segmentation may be automated, semi-automated, or manual which rely on differences in material density, attenuation characteristics, and/or advanced software algorithms. Spectral Detector Computed Tomography (SDCT) is a form of dual energy computed tomography that works at the detector level to generate virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) at different energies/ kilo-electron volts (keV). These VMI have varying contrast and attenuation characteristics relative to material density. The purpose of this pilot project is to explore the use of VMI in segmentation for medical 3D printing in four separate clinical scenarios. Cases were retrospectively selected based on varying complexity, value of spectral data, and across multiple clinical disciplines (Vascular, Cardiology, Oncology, and Orthopedic).Entities:
Keywords: 3D printing; Dual layer CT; Dual-energy CT; Segmentation; Spectral detector CT
Year: 2019 PMID: 30659415 PMCID: PMC6505638 DOI: 10.1186/s41205-019-0038-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3D Print Med ISSN: 2365-6271
Fig. 1Conventional (a) and VMI 40 keV (b) axial SDCT images of case 1 TAVR planning. The 40 keV VMI data demonstrates increased aortic vascular contrast enhancement (HU: 206) compared to conventional CT (HU: 89). 3D volume renderings of the abdominal aorta from the conventional (c) and 40 keV VMI (d) data created using the same segmentation tools and workflow show better continuity and inclusion of the vascular lumen on 40 keV VMI compared to conventional CT
Fig. 23D printed aortic vasculature from the 40 keV VMI data at 25% scale size. The model was printed using the Formlabs Form 2 SLA 3D printer with standard clear resin material. A guide wire is placed through the right common femoral artery simulating vascular access
Fig. 3Conventional (a) and VMI 40 keV (b) axial SDCT delayed contrast phase images of case 2 left atrial appendage thrombus. The left atrial appendage thrombus (arrow) is better demarcated in the 40 keV VMI compared to the conventional CT. Zeffective SDCT image (c) at the same level shows the effective atomic number value at every voxel which is derived from the photo and scatter values computed from the low and high energy signals. The change in relative atomic number of the thrombus area (arrow, yellow material) relative to the surrounding iodine enhanced material (teal and blue colors) further validates the thrombus composition rather than poor/slow blood flow. (d) The 1:1 scale 3D printed LAA thrombus using 40 keV VMI data and the Formlabs Form 2 standard black resin is shown next to an LAA closure device model for scale
Fig. 4Conventional (a) and VMI 40 keV (b) axial SDCT images of case 3 malignant tracheal lesion. The recurrent tracheal malignancy (white arrow) is enhanced in the 40 keV VMI compared to conventional CT. 3D volume rendering and segmentation of the bronchial tree from the 40 keV VMI data (c) also demonstrates good definition of the tracheal lesion (black arrow). (d) 3D printed bronchial tree from the 40 keV VMI data at 50% scale. The Formlabs Form 2 with standard clear resin was used and the tracheal lesion indentation was marked with black ink for visualization
Fig. 5Conventional (a) and VMI 120 keV (b) axial SDCT images of case 4 left upper extremity trauma. There is significant reduction of metal artifact on the 120 keV VMI allowing for direct visualization of the metal hardware and associated incompletely healed fracture. c, d Various views of the 3D printed humeral head at 75% scale size using the Formlabs Form 2 standard white resin material. The cross-sectional view through the humeral head (d) demonstrates the fracture lines and track from the orthopedic intramedullary hardware
Hounsfield Unit (HU) values of segmented anatomy for conventional and VMI data from all four presented cases including ratio differential. Comparative and differential calculations were also made between the segmented ROI HU and the adjacent tissue material HU
| Case | Conventional HU at ROI (C) | VMI HU at ROI (V) | HU value of tissue surrounding ROI (S) | HU Ratio Difference (C:V) | Δ HU Conventional HU to HU surrounding ROI (C-S) | Δ HU VMI HU to HU surrounding ROI (V-S) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89 | 206 | 62 | 1:2.3 | 27 | 144 |
| 2 | 308 | 666 | 250 | 1:2.2 | 58 | 416 |
| 3 | 148 | 451 | 87 | 1:3.0 | 61 | 364 |
| 4 | 698 | 66 | NA* | 1:0.11** | NA | NA |
*Case 4 was based on CT artifact reduction rather than surrounding tissue ROI differentiation and therefore HU value of tissue surrounding ROI was not calculated
**The Ratio is less than one, because high keV VMI results in decreased ROI attenuation compared to conventional images