Bharathi Upadhya1, Richard B Stacey2, Dalane W Kitzman2. 1. Cardiovascular Medicine Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. bupadhya@wakehealth.edu. 2. Cardiovascular Medicine Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Previous trials definitively established that lowering systolic blood pressure (BP) to 140 mmHg prevented heart failure (HF) exacerbations, but the potential benefits and risks of further BP reduction remain unclear due to a paucity of trial-based data. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) found that in older, high-risk, non-diabetic participants with systolic hypertension, a BP treatment target < 120 mmHg resulted in a 36% lower rate of acute decompensated HF as compared with a BP target < 140 mmHg. Those participants with incident HF had a 26-fold increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events and death. Based in part on the SPRINT results, the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/HF Society Guideline for the Management of HF acknowledged that targeting a significant reduction in BP in those at increased risk for cardiovascular disease is a novel risk-based strategy to prevent HF. SPRINT redefines systolic BP target goals in older, high-risk patients and provides a key opportunity for preventing HF in this patient group.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Previous trials definitively established that lowering systolic blood pressure (BP) to 140 mmHg prevented heart failure (HF) exacerbations, but the potential benefits and risks of further BP reduction remain unclear due to a paucity of trial-based data. RECENT FINDINGS: A recent secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) found that in older, high-risk, non-diabeticparticipants with systolic hypertension, a BP treatment target < 120 mmHg resulted in a 36% lower rate of acute decompensated HF as compared with a BP target < 140 mmHg. Those participants with incident HF had a 26-fold increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events and death. Based in part on the SPRINT results, the 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/HF Society Guideline for the Management of HF acknowledged that targeting a significant reduction in BP in those at increased risk for cardiovascular disease is a novel risk-based strategy to prevent HF. SPRINT redefines systolic BP target goals in older, high-risk patients and provides a key opportunity for preventing HF in this patient group.
Authors: Clyde W Yancy; Mariell Jessup; Biykem Bozkurt; Javed Butler; Donald E Casey; Monica M Colvin; Mark H Drazner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Gregg C Fonarow; Michael M Givertz; Steven M Hollenberg; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Frederick A Masoudi; Patrick E McBride; Pamela N Peterson; Lynne Warner Stevenson; Cheryl Westlake Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2017-04-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Mark H Drazner; Daniel L Dries; Ronald M Peshock; Richard S Cooper; Chris Klassen; Farhana Kazi; DuWayne Willett; Ronald G Victor Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-06-06 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Henry N Ginsberg; Marshall B Elam; Laura C Lovato; John R Crouse; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter Linz; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; Hertzel C Gerstein; Jeffrey Probstfield; Richard H Grimm; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; J Thomas Bigger; David C Goff; William C Cushman; Denise G Simons-Morton; Robert P Byington Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeff D Williamson; Mark A Supiano; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Ruth C Campbell; Glenn M Chertow; Larry J Fine; William E Haley; Amret T Hawfield; Joachim H Ix; Dalane W Kitzman; John B Kostis; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Lenore J Launer; Suzanne Oparil; Carlos J Rodriguez; Christianne L Roumie; Ronald I Shorr; Kaycee M Sink; Virginia G Wadley; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Nancy F Woolard; Jackson T Wright; Nicholas M Pajewski Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew Sharp; Robyn Tapp; Darrel P Francis; Simon A McG Thom; Alun D Hughes; Alice V Stanton; Andrew Zambanini; Nish Chaturvedi; Sheila Byrd; Neil R Poulter; Peter S Sever; Jamil Mayet Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jorge R Kizer; Donna K Arnett; Jonathan N Bella; Mary Paranicas; D C Rao; Michael A Province; Albert Oberman; Dalane W Kitzman; Paul N Hopkins; Jennifer E Liu; Richard B Devereux Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-05-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Paolo Verdecchia; Jan A Staessen; Fabio Angeli; Giovanni de Simone; Augusto Achilli; Antonello Ganau; Gianfrancesco Mureddu; Sergio Pede; Aldo P Maggioni; Donata Lucci; Gianpaolo Reboldi Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-08-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Rebecca J Molsberry; Leah Rethy; Michael C Wang; Rupal C Mehta; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Hongyan Ning; Cora E Lewis; Clyde W Yancy; Sanjiv J Shah; Sadiya S Khan Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 10.190