Literature DB >> 30659348

Development of a novel model for predicting survival of patients with spine metastasis from colorectal cancer.

Yujie Liu1, Minglei Yang1, Bo Li1, Kehan Xu1, Xin Gao1, Jialin Li1, Haifeng Wei1, Quan Huang2, Wei Xu3, Jianru Xiao4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a novel nomogram for predicting survival of patients with spine metastasis from colorectal cancer (SMCRC) based on the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors.
METHODS: Included in this study were 93 SMCRC patients who received treatments in our institute between 2006 and 2017, whose clinical data were analyzed retrospectively by univariate and multivariate analysis to identify independent variables that could predict prognosis. A nomogram for survival prediction was established on the basis of preoperative independent factors, and then subjected to bootstrap re-samples for internal validation. The discrimination was measured by concordance index (C-index). We used ROC analysis with the corresponding AUROC to compare the prediction accuracy of Changzheng Nomogram with three existing prognostic systems (Tomita, Tokuhashi and Bauer).
RESULTS: The high and median degrees of primary tumor differentiation, primary tumor surgery, carcinoembryonic antigen ≤ 5 ng/ml, no visceral metastases and ECOG-PS (0-2) were favorable prognostic factors for CRC metastases in the spine. These five preoperative independent factors were identified and entered into the nomogram with the C-index of 0.786 (0.739-0.833). The calibration curves for probability of 12- and 24-month overall survival (OS) showed good agreement between the predictive risk and the actual risk, and calibration was assessed. Compared with the previous prognostic systems, Changzheng Nomogram reported in this study showed higher accuracy in predicting OS of patients with SMCRC spinal metastases (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: By using this novel predictive model, clinicians could more precisely estimate the survival outcome of individual patients by evaluating clinical characteristics and identify subgroups of patients who are in need of a specific individual treatment strategy. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Nomogram; Prognostic factor; Spine metastasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30659348     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05879-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  52 in total

1.  Direct decompressive surgical resection in the treatment of spinal cord compression caused by metastatic cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Roy A Patchell; Phillip A Tibbs; William F Regine; Richard Payne; Stephen Saris; Richard J Kryscio; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Byron Young
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Aug 20-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Are nomograms better than currently available stage groupings for bladder cancer?

Authors:  Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis.

Authors:  Yasuaki Tokuhashi; Hiromi Matsuzaki; Hiroshi Oda; Masashi Oshima; Junnosuke Ryu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Hedvig Hricak; Michael W Kattan; Hui-Ni Chen; Peter T Scardino; Kentaro Kuroiwa
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Changing patterns of bone and brain metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark L Sundermeyer; Neal J Meropol; Andre Rogatko; Hao Wang; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  Treatment and prognosis in colorectal cancer patients with bone metastasis.

Authors:  Mutsumi Nozue; Yukio Oshiro; Masanao Kurata; Ken-Ichiro Seino; Naoto Koike; Toru Kawamoto; Hideki Taniguchi; Takeshi Todoroki; Katashi Fukao
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Surgical strategy for spinal metastases.

Authors:  K Tomita; N Kawahara; T Kobayashi; A Yoshida; H Murakami; T Akamaru
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Surgery in spinal metastasis without spinal cord compression: indications and strategy related to the risk of recurrence.

Authors:  H Chataigner; M Onimus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan Study Group.

Authors:  L B Saltz; J V Cox; C Blanke; L S Rosen; L Fehrenbacher; M J Moore; J A Maroun; S P Ackland; P K Locker; N Pirotta; G L Elfring; L L Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Validation and adaptation of a nomogram for predicting the survival of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma using a three-grade system.

Authors:  Luigi Mariani; Rosalba Miceli; Michael W Kattan; Murray F Brennan; Maurizio Colecchia; Marco Fiore; Paolo G Casali; Alessandro Gronchi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.