Background: Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and, in some studies, improved survival. Since 2011, bisphosphonate use has been recommended by NCCN for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy independent of the presence of bone disease. This study investigated their use after these guidelines were established. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥65 years in the SEER-Medicare database with newly diagnosed MM between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, who received antineoplastic therapy, had ≥6 months of follow-up, and did not receive prior bisphosphonates. Presence of SREs at diagnosis was identified, including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone, or surgery to bone. Use of bisphosphonates was defined as having ≥1 claim for an intravenous or oral bisphosphonate within 6 months after the start of antineoplastic therapy. We used multivariable modeling to compare users with nonusers, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. We compared overall survival between users and nonusers using proportional hazards analysis. Results: Of 1,309 patients identified, 720 (55%) used a bisphosphonate. Factors associated with use included SRE at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; 95% CI, 1.98-3.40), hypercalcemia (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41), and use of proteasome inhibitor + immunomodulatory imide therapy (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.39). Chronic kidney disease (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.66) was associated with decreased use. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88). Conclusions: Although bisphosphonate use is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy, 45% of patients in the United States did not receive this guideline-recommended care.
Background: Bisphosphonates reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and, in some studies, improved survival. Since 2011, bisphosphonate use has been recommended by NCCN for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy independent of the presence of bone disease. This study investigated their use after these guidelines were established. Methods: We identified patients aged ≥65 years in the SEER-Medicare database with newly diagnosed MM between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013, who received antineoplastic therapy, had ≥6 months of follow-up, and did not receive prior bisphosphonates. Presence of SREs at diagnosis was identified, including pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation to bone, or surgery to bone. Use of bisphosphonates was defined as having ≥1 claim for an intravenous or oral bisphosphonate within 6 months after the start of antineoplastic therapy. We used multivariable modeling to compare users with nonusers, controlling for demographic and clinical covariates. We compared overall survival between users and nonusers using proportional hazards analysis. Results: Of 1,309 patients identified, 720 (55%) used a bisphosphonate. Factors associated with use included SRE at diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; 95% CI, 1.98-3.40), hypercalcemia (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.41), and use of proteasome inhibitor + immunomodulatory imide therapy (AOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.21-2.39). Chronic kidney disease (AOR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.35-0.66) was associated with decreased use. Bisphosphonate use was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88). Conclusions: Although bisphosphonate use is recommended for all patients with newly diagnosed MM receiving antineoplastic therapy, 45% of patients in the United States did not receive this guideline-recommended care.
Authors: Andrew L Himelstein; Jared C Foster; James L Khatcheressian; John D Roberts; Drew K Seisler; Paul J Novotny; Rui Qin; Ronald S Go; Stephen S Grubbs; Tracey O'Connor; Mario R Velasco; Douglas Weckstein; Ann O'Mara; Charles L Loprinzi; Charles L Shapiro Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J R Berenson; A Lichtenstein; L Porter; M A Dimopoulos; R Bordoni; S George; A Lipton; A Keller; O Ballester; M J Kovacs; H A Blacklock; R Bell; J Simeone; D J Reitsma; M Heffernan; J Seaman; R D Knight Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-02-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Noopur Raje; Robert Vescio; Charles W Montgomery; Ashraf Badros; Nikhil Munshi; Richard Orlowski; Joseph T Hadala; Ghulam Warsi; Eliza Argonza-Aviles; Solveig G Ericson; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Evangelos Terpos; Gareth Morgan; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Matthew T Drake; Suzanne Lentzsch; Noopur Raje; Orhan Sezer; Ramón García-Sanz; Kazuyuki Shimizu; Ingemar Turesson; Tony Reiman; Artur Jurczyszyn; Giampaolo Merlini; Andrew Spencer; Xavier Leleu; Michele Cavo; Nikhil Munshi; S Vincent Rajkumar; Brian G M Durie; G David Roodman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Xianglin L Du; Shenying Fang; Sally W Vernon; Hashem El-Serag; Y Tina Shih; Jessica Davila; Monica L Rasmus Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Ana I Tergas; June Y Hou; Yongmei Huang; Jim C Hu; Grace Clarke Hillyer; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Walter M Gregory; Kim Cocks; Sue E Bell; Alex J Szubert; Nuria Navarro-Coy; Mark T Drayson; Roger G Owen; Sylvia Feyler; A John Ashcroft; Fiona Ross; Jennifer Byrne; Huw Roddie; Claudius Rudin; Gordon Cook; Graham H Jackson; J Anthony Child Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jifang Zhou; Karen Sweiss; Edith A Nutescu; Jin Han; Pritesh R Patel; Naomi Y Ko; Todd A Lee; Brian C-H Chiu; Gregory S Calip Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-01-15