Literature DB >> 30659106

Memoranda of understanding: a tobacco industry strategy to undermine illicit tobacco trade policies.

Eric Crosbie1,2, Stella Bialous2, Stanton A Glantz2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Analyse the transnational tobacco companies' (TTCs) memoranda of understanding (MoUs) on illicit trade and how they could undermine the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products (Protocol).
METHODS: Review of tobacco industry documents and websites, reports, news and media items using standard snowball search methods.
RESULTS: Facing increasing pressure from governments and the FCTC to address illicit tobacco trade during the late 1990s, TTCs entered into voluntary partnerships embodied in MoUs with governments' law enforcement and customs agencies. One of the earliest known MoUs was between Philip Morris International and Italy in 1999. TTCs agreed among themselves to establish MoUs individually but use the Italian MoU as a basis to establish similar connections with other governments to pre-empt more stringent regulation of illicit trade. TTCs report to have signed over 100 MoUs since 1999, and promote them on their websites, in Corporate Social Responsibility reports and in the media as important partnerships to combat illicit tobacco trade. There is no evidence to support TTCs' claims that these MoUs reduce illicit trade. The terms of these MoUs are rarely made public. MoUs are non-transparent partnerships between government agencies and TTCs, violating FCTC Article 5.3 and the Protocol. MoUs are not legally binding so do not create an accountability system or penalties for non-compliance, rendering them ineffective at controlling illicit trade.
CONCLUSION: Governments should reject TTC partnerships through MoUs and instead ratify and implement the FCTC and the Protocol to effectively address illicit trade in tobacco products. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Globalisation; Illegal Tobacco Products; Public Policy; Tobacco Industry; Tobacco Industry Documents

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30659106      PMCID: PMC6639151          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  57 in total

1.  Avoiding "truth": tobacco industry promotion of life skills training.

Authors:  Lev L Mandel; Stella Aguinaga Bialous; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Corporate social responsibility: serious cause for concern.

Authors:  Kelley Lee; Stella Aguinaga Bialous
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  No increase in Australia's illicit tobacco trade is seen after plain packs are introduced.

Authors:  Jacqui Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Tobacco industry manipulation of the hospitality industry to maintain smoking in public places.

Authors:  J V Dearlove; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  The importance of continued engagement during the implementation phase of tobacco control policies in a middle-income country: the case of Costa Rica.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Patricia Sosa; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Social responsibility in tobacco production? Tobacco companies' use of green supply chains to obscure the real costs of tobacco farming.

Authors:  Marty Otañez; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Project Cerberus: tobacco industry strategy to create an alternative to the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks; Jeffrey Drope; Stella Aguinaga Bialous; Rachel Rose Jackson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Towards a greater understanding of the illicit tobacco trade in Europe: a review of the PMI funded 'Project Star' report.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Andy Rowell; Silvano Gallus; Alessandra Lugo; Luk Joossens; Michelle Sims
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 10.  Impact of the WHO FCTC over the first decade: a global evidence review prepared for the Impact Assessment Expert Group.

Authors:  Janet Chung-Hall; Lorraine Craig; Shannon Gravely; Natalie Sansone; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measuring the illicit cigarette market in Mexico: a cross validation of two methodologies.

Authors:  Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Michal Stoklosa; Kevin Welding; Jeffrey Drope
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Firm foundation or neglected cornerstone? The paradox of Article 5.3 implementation and the challenge of strengthening tobacco control governance.

Authors:  Rob Ralston; Stella Bialous; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.953

3.  Tobacco supply and demand strategies used in African countries.

Authors:  Eric Crosbie; Vincent Defrank; Catherine O Egbe; Olalekan Ayo-Yusuf; Stella Bialous
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  'They have a right to participate as a stakeholder': Article 5.3 implementation and government interactions with the tobacco industry in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Selamawit Hirpa; Rob Ralston; Wakgari Deressa; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.