| Literature DB >> 30658486 |
Zhengjie Tang1,2,3, Runzhou Huang4, Changtong Mei5, Xiuxuan Sun6, Dingguo Zhou7, Xiuqiang Zhang8, Qinglin Wu9.
Abstract
Performance of hardened oil well cement (OWC) is largely determined by the rheological properties of the cement slurries. This work was carried out to investigate the effect of water- to-cement ratio (WCR) and cellulose nanoparticles (CNPs), including cellulose nanofibers (CNFs) and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs), on rheology performance of OWC-based slurries using a Couette rotational viscometer coupled with rheological models. The yield stress and viscosity of neat OWC slurries had a decreasing trend with the increase of WCRs. The suspension became increased unstable with the increase of WCRs. The properties of CNPs, including rheological behaviors, surface properties and morphology, determine the rheological performance of CNP-OWC slurries. In comparison with CNC-OWC slurries, the gel strength, yield stress and viscosity of CNF-OWC slurries were higher as CNFs were more likely to form an entangled network. The gel strength, yield stress and viscosity of CNP-OWC slurries increased with reduced CNF size through regrinding and the proportion of CNFs in the mixture of CNFs and CNCs, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose nanoparticles; oil well cement; rheology; rotational viscometer
Year: 2019 PMID: 30658486 PMCID: PMC6356419 DOI: 10.3390/ma12020291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Formulation of cement and cement- cellulose nanoparticles (CNP) pastes used in the study.
| Formulation | Sample ID | WCR | CNP (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | WC40 | 0.40 | 0 |
| WC45 | 0.45 | 0 | |
| WC50 | 0.50 | 0 | |
| WC55 | 0.55 | 0 | |
| WC60 | 0.60 | 0 | |
| CNC | WC50C05 | 0.50 | 0.05 |
| WC50C10 | 0.50 | 0.10 | |
| WC50C15 | 0.50 | 0.15 | |
| WC50C20 | 0.50 | 0.20 | |
| CNF | WC50F05 | 0.50 | 0.05 |
| WC50F10 | 0.50 | 0.10 | |
| WC50F15 | 0.50 | 0.15 | |
| WC50F20 | 0.50 | 0.20 | |
| WC50F15G10 | 0.50 | 0.15 | |
| WC50F15G30 | 0.50 | 0.15 | |
| CNC-CNF | WC50C05F10 | 0.50 | 0.15 |
| WC50C075F075 | 0.50 | 0.15 | |
| WC50C10F05 | 0.50 | 0.15 |
Note: WC is water cement; WCR is WC ratio; C is cellulose nanocrystals (CNC); F, is CNF; G is grinding, and the added amount of CNP was based on the mass of dry oil well cement (OWC).
Mathematical models for rheological properties of cement-based slurries [1,18].
| Model | Main Equation |
|---|---|
| Bingham Plastic Model (BPM) |
|
| Modified Bingham Model (MBM) |
|
| Power Law Model (PLM) |
|
| Hershcel-Bulkley Model (HBM) |
|
Note: is shear stress, istrain rate, τ0 isyield stress, μ isplastic viscosity, c isregression constant, k is consistency index, and n ispower law index.
Figure 1Characterization of CNFs and CNCs: (a) FT-IR transmittance spectra; (b) X-ray diffraction spectra.
Figure 2Morphology of CNFs and CNCs, (a) and (b): Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) micrographs of CNFs and CNCs; (c) and (d): TEM micrographs of CNFs with two different regrinding conditions (10 and 30 times), respectively.
Figure 3Plots of shear stress versus shear rate for neat OWC slurries (a) and their gel strengths (b) at different WCRs.
Rheological properties of neat OWC slurries calculated by different rheology models.
| Models | Sample No. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WCR 0.40 | WCR 0.45 | WCR 0.50 | WCR 0.55 | WCR 0.60 | ||
| BPM |
| 18.75 | 10.93 | 9.60 | 10.39 | 8.81 |
|
| 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | |
| R2 | 0.9567 | 0.9899 | 0.9660 | 0.8985 | 0.8608 | |
| MBM |
| 10.32 | 9.94 | 10.72 | 13.04 | 10.75 |
|
| 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| c | −8.20 × 10−5 | −9.59 × 10−6 | 1.09 × 10−5 | 2.58 × 10−5 | 1.89 × 10−5 | |
| R2 | 0.9930 | 0.9912 | 0.9693 | 0.9447 | 0.8991 | |
| PLM | k | 2.52 | 0.80 | 0.68 | 1.95 | 2.30 |
| n | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.44 | 0.38 | |
| R2 | 0.9958 | 0.9721 | 0.9122 | 0.7011 | 0.6913 | |
| HBM |
| 3.88 | 8.92 | 10.26 | - | - |
| k | 1.86 | 0.18 | 0.04 | - | - | |
| n | 0.62 | 0.89 | 1.06 | - | - | |
| R2 | 0.9968 | 0.9926 | 0.9666 | - | - | |
Figure 4Experimental data and fitted plot of shear stress versus shear rate for CNC-OWC slurries: (a) Bingham Plastic Model; (b) Hershcel-Bulkley Model; (c) Modified Bingham Model; and (d) Power Law Model.
Figure 5Experimental data and fitted plot of shear stress versus shear rate for CNF-OWC slurries: (a) Bingham Plastic Model; (b) Hershcel-Bulkley Model; (c) Modified Bingham Model; and (d) Power Law Model.
Figure 6Plots of initial and final gel strengths as a function of CNP content: (a) CNC-OWC; (b) CNF-OWC.
Yield stress and plastic viscosity of OWC slurries calculated by different rheology models.
| Sample ID | Yield Stress (Pa) | Plastic Viscosity (Pa.s) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BPM | MBM | HBM | BPM | MBM | ||
| Control | WC50 | 9.60 | 10.72 | 10.26 | 0.05 | 0.04 |
| CNC | WC50C05 | 2.23 | 3.87 | - | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| WC50C10 | 3.90 | 5.28 | 5.48 | 0.06 | 0.06 | |
| WC50C15 | 8.31 | 8.00 | 7.37 | 0.07 | 0.10 | |
| WC50C20 | 12.25 | 9.02 | 6.70 | 0.07 | 0.10 | |
| CNF | WC50F05 | 16.10 | 12.54 | 8.65 | 0.10 | 0.15 |
| WC50F10 | 17.99 | 13.30 | 10.24 | 0.12 | 0.21 | |
| WC50F15 | 25.32 | 16.37 | 4.01 | 0.25 | 0.43 | |
| WC50F20 | 49.97 | 31.16 | 6.48 | 0.08 | 0.14 | |
| WC50F15G10 | 21.52 | 14.73 | 3.39 | 0.08 | 0.16 | |
| WC50F15G30 | 25.15 | 16.82 | 0.50 | 0.09 | 0.16 | |
| CNC-CNF | WC50C05F10 | 17.24 | 10.82 | 4.31 | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| WC50C075F075 | 14.92 | 10.10 | 5.69 | 0.07 | 0.10 | |
| WC50C10F05 | 12.20 | 9.25 | 7.11 | 0.05 | 0.04 | |
Figure 7Schematic illustrations of the interaction between CNPs and OWC. (a) CNC-OWC; (b) CNF-OWC.
Figure 8Plots of shear stress versus shear rate for CNP-OWC ((a) mixture of CNC and CNF and (b) grinding CNF-OWC, dash lines are the fitted lines using MBM) and initial and final gel strength with different addition of CNPs ((c) mixture of CNC and CNF and (d) reground CNFs).