Literature DB >> 30657329

Phase 0, including microdosing approaches: Applying the Three Rs and increasing the efficiency of human drug development.

Tal Burt1, Le Thuy Vuong2, Elizabeth Baker3, Graeme C Young4, A Daniel McCartt5, Mats Bergstrom6, Yuichi Sugiyama7, Robert Combes8.   

Abstract

Phase 0 approaches, including microdosing, involve the use of sub-therapeutic exposures to the tested drugs, thus enabling safer, more-relevant, quicker and cheaper first-in-human (FIH) testing. These approaches also have considerable potential to limit the use of animals in human drug development. Recent years have witnessed progress in applications, methodology, operations, and drug development culture. Advances in applications saw an expansion in therapeutic areas, developmental scenarios and scientific objectives, in, for example, protein drug development and paediatric drug development. In the operational area, the increased sensitivity of Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), expansion of the utility of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging, and the introduction of Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy (CRDS), have led to the increased accessibility and utility of Phase 0 approaches, while reducing costs and exposure to radioactivity. PET has extended the application of microdosing, from its use as a predominant tool to record pharmacokinetics, to a method for recording target expression and target engagement, as well as cellular and tissue responses. Advances in methodology include adaptive Phase 0/Phase 1 designs, cassette and cocktail microdosing, and Intra-Target Microdosing (ITM), as well as novel modelling opportunities and simulations. Importantly, these methodologies increase the predictive power of extrapolation from microdose to therapeutic level exposures. However, possibly the most challenging domain in which progress has been made, is the culture of drug development. One of the main potential values of Phase 0 approaches is the opportunity to terminate development early, thus not only applying the principle of 'kill-early-kill-cheap' to enhance the efficiency of drug development, but also obviating the need for the full package of animal testing required for therapeutic level Phase 1 studies. Finally, we list developmental scenarios that utilised Phase 0 approaches in novel drug development. 2018 FRAME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30657329     DOI: 10.1177/026119291804600603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Altern Lab Anim        ISSN: 0261-1929            Impact factor:   1.303


  6 in total

Review 1.  Phase 0/microdosing approaches: time for mainstream application in drug development?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Graeme Young; Wooin Lee; Hiroyuki Kusuhara; Oliver Langer; Malcolm Rowland; Yuichi Sugiyama
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of the Endocannabinoid System: Opportunities and Challenges in Radiotracer Development.

Authors:  Lu Hou; Jian Rong; Ahmed Haider; Daisuke Ogasawara; Cassis Varlow; Michael A Schafroth; Linjing Mu; Jiefeng Gan; Hao Xu; Christopher J Fowler; Ming-Rong Zhang; Neil Vasdev; Simon Ametamey; Benjamin F Cravatt; Lu Wang; Steven H Liang
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Proof of Concept: First Pediatric [14 C]microtracer Study to Create Metabolite Profiles of Midazolam.

Authors:  Bianca D van Groen; Esther van Duijn; Arjan de Vries; Miriam G Mooij; Dick Tibboel; Wouter H J Vaes; Saskia N de Wildt
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Monoplex and multiplex immunoassays: approval, advancements, and alternatives.

Authors:  Haseeb Ahsan
Journal:  Comp Clin Path       Date:  2021-11-20

5.  High-Performance Near-Infrared Fluorescent Secondary Antibodies for Immunofluorescence.

Authors:  Cynthia L Schreiber; Dong-Hao Li; Bradley D Smith
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Strategic, feasibility, economic, and cultural aspects of phase 0 approaches: Is it time to change the drug development process in order to increase productivity?

Authors:  Tal Burt; Ad F Roffel; Oliver Langer; Kirsten Anderson; Joseph DiMasi
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.438

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.