Evidence shows that an outbreak of Lassafever recently occurred in Nigeria,
involving many states and fatalities.[1-5] The mass media can play a
positive role in combating the Lassafever epidemic and its attendant fatality in
Nigeria. The mass media encompasses print and non-print methods of disseminating
information (including magazines, newspapers, radio, and television) to a large
number of people. One of the advantages of the mass media in health promotion
activities and/or health intervention is that it can be used to reach very high
numbers of people to engage in activities related to health behaviour
changes.[6-16] Several authors have noted
significant positive roles of the mass media in health interventions and positive
impacts in the promotion of health behaviour changes among people with communicable
and non-communicable diseases, reduction of mental health-related stigma, and
improvement in health service utilisation.[6-16] Based on the roles the mass
media can play in health intervention, authors have described the mass media as an
educator, supporter, promoter, and programme supplementer.[6] Thus, the mass media can be utilised as an independent type of intervention
for educating people and supporting lifestyle changes. In addition, the mass media
can be utilised as a complementary form of intervention for promoting or
supplementing the efficacies of other interventions aimed at health promotion.[6] Proper execution of mass media campaigns can help complement the efforts of
clinicians toward the prevention of diseases.[12] Therefore, the aim of this paper is to highlight the mass media reportage of
Lassafever in Nigeria.
Methodology
This paper adopts a brief discussion approach. From June to October 2018, the authors
searched for relevant information in the grey literature, Scopus database, PubMed,
Cochrane database, and Google. The primary mass media sources of information for
this review included Nigerian newspapers and magazines such as
Vanguard, Sahara Reporters, Premium
Times, Daily Post, The Punch,
The Guardian, Information Nigeria, The
Telegraph, Nigeria Health Watch,
NigeriaGalleria, The Communicator, and
The Sun. Television stations from which Lassafever information
was also derived included African Independent Television and the Nigerian Television
Authority. The authors used no inclusion or exclusion criteria for the literature
search. The following search keywords were used to obtain information for this
review: “Lassafever,” “media,” “mass media,” “Lassafever outbreak in Nigeria,” and
“news reports of Lassafever in Nigeria” were used to obtain information for this
review.
Results and Discussion
Reports on the disease outbreak indicated that at the commencement of 2012, the
Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health sent notification of the Lassafever outbreak in
Nigeria to the World Health Organization.[1] On 22 March 2012, 623 suspected cases of Lassafever (including 70 deaths)
were reported from 19 Nigerian states.[1] Available data from August 2015 to January 2016 indicated 159 suspected cases
(including 82 deaths) across 19 Nigerian states.[2] The 2016 report by the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) showed that
Lassafever outbreak was active in 5 Nigerian states, and 985 suspected cases and
126 deaths were reported.[3] The 2017 report by the NCDC revealed that 19 Nigerian states reported at
least one confirmed case of Lassafever; the case fatality rate was 29.5% and 12.8%
in confirmed and probable cases, respectively.[4] The 2018 NCDC report indicated that there were 2576 suspected cases from 22
Nigerian states from January to September.[5] From these, the NCDC reported that 510 cases were confirmed positive, 10
cases were considered probable, and 2055 cases were negative.[5] According to the report, the 2018 Lassafever outbreak resulted in 134 deaths
among confirmed cases and 10 among probable cases with a 26.3% case fatality rate
among the confirmed cases.[5] The high fatality rate from outbreaks of Lassafever might have been due to
the prevalence of certain unhealthy sanitary and environmental behaviours that
increase the risk of Lassafever among Nigerians. For example, people (particularly
children) living in rural areas eat rodents, which are the primary carriers of Lassafever.[17] Transmission routes of Lassafever include human contact with the faeces of
these rodents and/or human food waste that these rodents scavenge on as well as the
eating of poorly covered food that may have been urinated upon or eaten in part by
these rodents.[18]The Nigerian mass media focused on the latest outbreak of Lassafever in many states
of the country. Some of the Nigerian mass media that are still disseminating
information about Lassafever outbreak, its causal agents, its signs and symptoms,
preventive measures, and existing efforts toward combating the epidemic include
Vanguard,[19]
Sahara Reporters,[20]
Premium Times,[21]
Daily Post,[22]
The Punch,[23]
The Guardian,[24]
Information Nigeria,[25]
The Telegraph,[26]
Nigeria Health Watch,[27]
NigeriaGalleria,[28]
The Communicator,[29] and The Sun.[30] Furthermore, government at all levels, non-governmental organisations, and
faith-based organisations used radio stations, television stations, and social media
to complementarily create awareness, sensitise, and mobilise the populace against
the spread of the disease.[31] News flashes, breaking news, newspaper headlines, and media commentaries on
the epidemic were present across the entire national and regional dailies, radio,
and television stations.[19-33]However, the present review suggests that the media reporting of the outbreak was
only partially successful for several reasons despite the fact that many people are
now aware of Lassafever and/or its outbreaks have been contained or are being
contained. Despite ongoing media sensitisation, many Nigerians, such as people
living in the rural populace in the Ijebu North Local Government Area of Ogun State,
are reportedly unaware that rodents are vectors of Lassafever.[34] Illiteracy could also contribute to poor reception of the media reportage on
Lassafever among the people. Educated people largely have access to the Internet
and at least one form of mass media, and as such could receive different findings
from those in the Ijebu North Local Government Area of Ogun State.Nigerian people’s level of awareness of Lassafever could be a contributing factor to
the degree of success in combating the disease. One Nigerian study showed that 101
of 500 (20.2%) respondents in a community-based sample said that they had heard
about Lassafever.[35] Additionally, 19.4% of the study sample had good knowledge of Lassafever
occurrence, 14.1% had good knowledge of the causes of Lassafever, 17.0% had good
knowledge of the mode of transmission, and 13.9% had good knowledge of Lassafever
prevention and control strategies.[35] It is therefore important to scale up efforts to increase knowledge about the
disease, vectors, symptoms, and prevention strategies among Nigerian people within
and outside endemic communities.[36]Given the above reports, we argue that the Nigerian mass media activities were only
partially successful because they ignored some essential information relating to the
epidemic. In our own view, inappropriate structuring and timing of radio and
television programmes also seems to have hindered the promotion of appropriate
health and environmental behaviours aimed at combating Lassafever in Nigeria. These
were complemented by the problems of an unreliable power supply, which prevents the
more than 70% Nigerians living below the poverty line[37] from accessing media programmes. Our observations indicate that the
non-reception of networking and people’s indifference to media programmes on Lassa
prevention because they perceived them as a government propaganda machine might have
hindered the mass media’s efforts to create much awareness about Lassafever in the
country. Another factor is overcrowding of people in most places. A previous study
conducted in the urban slums of the western part of Nigeria showed that of 500
participants, 43.0% were living in overcrowded rooms and 9.1% claimed to have never
seen a rat in their homes.[35]The state and federal governments as well as national and international health bodies
and ministries have made several efforts to combat the Lassafever epidemic in
Nigeria. The federal and state governments in Nigeria are enhancing disease
surveillance for early detection, reinforcing treatment of patients, and conducting
awareness campaigns among the affected population.[1] Lassafever treatment centres (LassaFever Research and Control Centre of
Irua Specialist Hospital in Edo State and the Virology Laboratory of Lagos
University Teaching Hospital in Lagos State) have been established in some of the
affected states, such as Edo and Lagos, to combat the spread of the disease.[38] The World Health Organization is collaborating with the Nigeria Federal
Ministry of Health in the surveillance of and response to outbreaks of Lassafever,
covering contact tracing, follow-up, and community mobilisation.[38] Additionally, the first international conference is being organised by the
NCDC to enable researchers to collaborate with each other and share research
findings about Lassafever with regard to what is known and where knowledge gaps
still exist and to prioritise the Lassafever research and response plan for the future.[39] The theme of the conference is “50 Years of LassaFever: Rising to the Challenge.”[39] The conference, which provides travel scholarships to Nigerian participants
to help reduce expenses, will be held in Abuja, Nigeria on 16 and 17 January 2019.[39] These are laudable efforts geared toward overcoming the Lassafever epidemic
in Nigeria, reinforcing training for clinicians, and sensitising communities.
Overall, it is suggested that affected communities should be highly engaged in the
Lassafever control and prevention efforts in the country. It is also suggested that
the Nigerian mass media should be supported and provided with accurate and
up-to-date information about the disease by the relevant health organisations such
as the NCDC to enable them to disseminate reliable information to the public.
Conclusion
Lassafever is a serious public health issue in Nigeria. The mass media can play a
positive role in combating Lassafever and its attendant fatality in Nigeria.
However, it seems that mass media activities have been only partially successful
because they ignore essential information relating to the epidemic. We also argue
that information gaps and the lack of timely and appropriate information are
hindrances to the promotion of appropriate health and environmental behaviours that
would help to reduce Lassafever in the country. It is recommended that media
reporters intensify efforts at understanding the best time of the day to broadcast
disease prevention information. The mass media should also make efforts toward
providing accurate information regarding disease outbreak because this might help
reduce panic and resistance to control and prevention measures. Media broadcasting
of disease outbreak and other related information may occur during the early morning
or late evening hours when many Nigerians, especially civil servants, are at home
and prepared to listen to news on the radio, view the television, or search the
Internet.
Declaration of conflicting interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Authors: Sarah Clement; Francesca Lassman; Elizabeth Barley; Sara Evans-Lacko; Paul Williams; Sosei Yamaguchi; Mike Slade; Nicolas Rüsch; Graham Thornicroft Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2013-07-23
Authors: Kristin V Carson; Faisal Ameer; Kourosh Sayehmiri; Khin Hnin; Joseph Em van Agteren; Fatemeh Sayehmiri; Malcolm P Brinn; Adrian J Esterman; Anne B Chang; Brian J Smith Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-06-02
Authors: Joseph Oluchukwu Wogu; Christiana Ogeri Chukwu; Kenneth Adibe Nwafor; Joel Chinedum Ugwuoke; Chinyere Christiana Ugwulor-Onyinyechi Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Laura Merson; Josephine Bourner; Sulaiman Jalloh; Astrid Erber; Alex Paddy Salam; Antoine Flahault; Piero L Olliaro Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2021-09-21