Uwe H W Schütz1,2. 1. Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. uwe.schuetz@outlook.com. 2. Orthopädie und Schmerzmedizin am Grünen Turm, Grüner-Turm-Str. 4-10, 88212, Ravensburg, Deutschland. uwe.schuetz@outlook.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiological imaging is important in the preoperative diagnosis of many forms of spinal pathology and plays a fundamental role in the assessment of p.o. effects, which can be verified on the spinal column as well as on the surrounding soft tissues, depending on the imaging method used. AIM: The article provides an overview of the current status and possibilities of radiological diagnostic methods for the verification of possibly recommended spine surgery in the context of degenerative, inflammatory-infectious, post-traumatic or p.o. pathologies and changes in the spine: X‑rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The supplementary nuclear medicine procedures (scintigraphy, PET[-CT], SPECT, etc.) which may be required for special questions are not discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The merits and limitations of the techniques used in the investigation of advanced degenerative spinal pathologies and post-traumatic conditions are discussed, with multidetector CT being the focus of attention in spinal clearance for traumatic injuries. In most cases of spinal infection, MRI images, as a central diagnostic tool, show typical findings such as destruction of adjacent endplates, bone marrow and intervertebral disc abnormalities, and paravertebral or epidural abscesses. However, it is not always easy to diagnose a spinal infection, especially if atypical MR patterns of infectious spondylitis are present. Knowledge of them means misdiagnosis and improper treatment can be avoided. RESULTS: It is shown that high-quality modern radiological examinations are essential for diagnosis and p.o. management, as these provide answers to the main questions in the treatment: Is the entity/injury stable or unstable, acute or old, benign or malign; is there a myelopathy or p.o. complication? DISCUSSION: The main indications for p.o. diagnostic imaging, difficulties such as metal artefact formation, and potential pitfalls are analyzed. Entity-specific radiological image patterns, imaging algorithms and differential diagnostic peculiarities are presented and discussed based on current literature and selected case studies.
BACKGROUND: Radiological imaging is important in the preoperative diagnosis of many forms of spinal pathology and plays a fundamental role in the assessment of p.o. effects, which can be verified on the spinal column as well as on the surrounding soft tissues, depending on the imaging method used. AIM: The article provides an overview of the current status and possibilities of radiological diagnostic methods for the verification of possibly recommended spine surgery in the context of degenerative, inflammatory-infectious, post-traumatic or p.o. pathologies and changes in the spine: X‑rays, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The supplementary nuclear medicine procedures (scintigraphy, PET[-CT], SPECT, etc.) which may be required for special questions are not discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The merits and limitations of the techniques used in the investigation of advanced degenerative spinal pathologies and post-traumatic conditions are discussed, with multidetector CT being the focus of attention in spinal clearance for traumatic injuries. In most cases of spinal infection, MRI images, as a central diagnostic tool, show typical findings such as destruction of adjacent endplates, bone marrow and intervertebral disc abnormalities, and paravertebral or epidural abscesses. However, it is not always easy to diagnose a spinal infection, especially if atypical MR patterns of infectious spondylitis are present. Knowledge of them means misdiagnosis and improper treatment can be avoided. RESULTS: It is shown that high-quality modern radiological examinations are essential for diagnosis and p.o. management, as these provide answers to the main questions in the treatment: Is the entity/injury stable or unstable, acute or old, benign or malign; is there a myelopathy or p.o. complication? DISCUSSION: The main indications for p.o. diagnostic imaging, difficulties such as metal artefact formation, and potential pitfalls are analyzed. Entity-specific radiological image patterns, imaging algorithms and differential diagnostic peculiarities are presented and discussed based on current literature and selected case studies.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computed tomography; Infection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Trauma; X-ray