| Literature DB >> 30655754 |
Changxin Zhou1, Jinbo Li2, Yu Wang3, Shoukun Xue1, Yang Zhang1.
Abstract
Differences in BRAF gene mutation frequency and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) protein expression in thyroid tissues were detected to investigate their association with local tissue invasion and cervical lymph node metastasis potential of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC). The BRAF gene mutation frequency and TSHR expression in PTMC patients were detected via qPCR and immunohistochemical method, and the association between them was discussed combined with the clinical and pathological parameters. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for the univariate correlation analyses and comparison of mutation rate and expression rate, and Chi-square test was used for the association of central lymph node metastasis with BRAF gene and TSHR. The BRAFV600E mutation only existed in patients with thyroid cancer. Τhe larger the number of metastatic central lymph nodes was, the higher the proportion of BRAFV600E mutation would be. Τhe BRAFV600E mutation was related to the primary lesion size, capsular infiltration and lymph node metastasis of PTMC (P<0.05). The expression of TSHR in PTMC tissues was < those in thyroid benign lesions and para-carcinoma normal tissues, which was positively associated with the central lymph node metastasis (P<0.05). Τhe low expression of TSHR was related to the primary lesion size, capsular infiltration and metastatic lymph nodes of PTMC (P<0.05). The BRAFV600E and TSHR may be involved in the occurrence and lymphatic metastasis of PTMC. The BRAFV600E mutation has no association with the TSHR protein expression (P=0.256), but the coincidence coefficient indicates that their diagnostic significance in PTMC is not similar, so BRAFV600E mutation and TSHR protein expression can be used jointly in the prediction of invasion and lymph node metastasis of PTMC, which may be more meaningful for clinical guidance.Entities:
Keywords: BRAF gene; TSHR; central lymph node metastasis; papillary thyroid microcarcinoma
Year: 2018 PMID: 30655754 PMCID: PMC6313223 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Figure 1.Renin-angiotensin system/RAF/MEK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK) pathways.
Figure 2.Detection process of BRAFVE600 mutation via qPCR.
Figure 3.Detection process of TSHR protein expression via immunohistochemical method.
Clinicopathological data of 162 PTMC patients.
| Clinical parameter | n (%) |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | |
| ≥45 | 101 (62.3) |
| <45 | 61 (37.7) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 31 (19.1) |
| Female | 131 (81.9) |
| Tumor diameter | |
| ≤5 mm | 101 (62.3) |
| >5 mm and ≤10 mm | 61 (37.7) |
| Single or multiple lesion | |
| Single | 45 (27.8) |
| Multiple | 117 (72.2) |
| TNM staging | |
| I/II | 110 (67.9) |
| III/IV | 52 (32.1) |
| Capsular infiltration | |
| Yes | 119 (73.5) |
| No | 43 (26.5) |
| Central lymph node metastasis | |
| Yes | |
| >3 | 24 (14.8) |
| ≤3 | 61 (37.7) |
| No | 77 (47.50 |
| Lateral cervical lymph node metastasis | |
| Yes | 44 (51.8) |
| No | 41 (48.2) |
Figure 4.BRAF gene mutation curve.
Figure 5.Curves of wild-type BRAF gene, thyroid benign lesion and negative para-carcinoma tissues.
Comparison of mutation rate between PTMC and control group.
| BRAF gene | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Mutant type | Wild-type | Mutation rate % |
| PTMC | 135 | 27 | 83.3 |
| Thyroid benign lesion | 0 | 30 | 0 |
| Para-carcinoma normal tissue | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Univariate analyses of BRAF gene expression and clinical parameters in PTMC group.
| BRAF gene expression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical parameter | No. | Mutant type | Wild-type | χ2 value | P-value |
| Age (years) | 0.636 | 0.452[ | |||
| ≥45 | 101 | 86 | 15 | ||
| <45 | 61 | 49 | 12 | ||
| Sex | 0.282 | 0.596[ | |||
| Male | 31 | 26 | 5 | ||
| Female | 131 | 109 | 22 | ||
| Tumor diameter | 5.054 | 0.025[ | |||
| ≤5 mm | 101 | 79 | 22 | ||
| >5 mm and ≤10 mm | 61 | 56 | 5 | ||
| Single or multiple lesion | 0.055 | 0.814[ | |||
| Single | 45 | 37 | 8 | ||
| Multiple | 117 | 98 | 19 | ||
| TNM staging | 0.566 | 0.452[ | |||
| I/II | 110 | 90 | 20 | ||
| III/IV | 52 | 45 | 7 | ||
| Capsular infiltration | 3.948 | 0.047[ | |||
| Yes | 119 | 104 | 15 | ||
| No | 43 | 32 | 11 | ||
| Central lymph node metastasis | 6.520 | 0.038[ | |||
| Yes | |||||
| >3 | 24 | 23 | 1 | ||
| ≤3 | 61 | 53 | 8 | ||
| No | 77 | 59 | 18 | ||
| Lateral cervical lymph node metastasis | 5.491 | 0.019[ | |||
| Yes | 44 | 42 | 2 | ||
| No | 41 | 33 | 9 | ||
P<0.05, statistical significance
P>0.05, no statistical significance.
Figure 6.PTMC tissues without immunohistochemical staining (magnification, ×400).
Figure 9.High expression of TSHR protein in PTMC (magnification, ×400).
Comparison of expression level between PTMC and control group.
| TSHR | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Low expression | Normal expression | High expression |
| PTMC | 92 | 0 | 70 |
| Thyroid benign lesion | 0 | 30 | 0 |
| Para-carcinoma normal tissue | 0 | 30 | 0 |
The score in PTMC group is 4 points, suggesting the high expression.
Univariate analyses of TSHR expression and clinical parameters of PTMC in PTMC group.
| TSHR expression | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical parameter | No. | Low expression | High expression | χ2 | P-value |
| Age (years) | 0.044 | 0.834[ | |||
| ≥45 | 101 | 58 | 43 | ||
| <45 | 61 | 34 | 27 | ||
| Sex | 0.025 | 0.873[ | |||
| Male | 31 | 18 | 13 | ||
| Female | 131 | 74 | 57 | ||
| Tumor diameter | 4.332 | 0.037[ | |||
| ≤5 mm | 101 | 51 | 50 | ||
| >5 mm and ≤10 mm | 61 | 41 | 20 | ||
| Single or multiple lesion | 0.819 | 0.366[ | |||
| Single | 45 | 23 | 22 | ||
| Multiple | 117 | 69 | 48 | ||
| TNM staging | 0.351 | 0.06[ | |||
| I/II | 110 | 68 | 42 | ||
| III/IV | 52 | 24 | 28 | ||
| Capsular infiltration | 5.371 | 0.021[ | |||
| Yes | 119 | 74 | 45 | ||
| No | 43 | 18 | 25 | ||
| Central lymph node metastasis | 11.157 | 0.004[ | |||
| Yes | |||||
| >3 | 24 | 19 | 5 | ||
| ≤3 | 61 | 39 | 22 | ||
| No | 77 | 34 | 43 | ||
| Lateral cervical lymph node metastasis | 4.158 | 0.041[ | |||
| Yes | 44 | 29 | 15 | ||
| No | 41 | 18 | 23 | ||
P<0.05, statistical significance
P>0.05, no statistical significance.
Relationship between BRAFVE600 mutation and TSHR expression in PTMC group.
| TSHR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Low expression | High expression | Total | P-value | K (coincidence coefficient) |
| BRAF gene | 0.256[ | 0.06 | |||
| Mutant type | 74 | 61 | 135 | ||
| Wild-type | 18 | 9 | 27 | ||
| Total | 70 | 92 | 162 | ||
P>0.05, no statistical significance.