Sha Zhu1, Lili Jiang1,2, Liuyan Wang3, Lingli Wang1, Cong Zhang1, Yu Ma1, Tao Huang4. 1. Department of Immunology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Chemoprevention, College of Basic Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, chzsha06@126.com. 2. Department of Basic Medicine, School of Nursing, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 3. Department of Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, Henan, China. 4. Oncological Surgery, Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China, andhuangtao_70@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Resistance to mitoxantrone (MTX), an anthracenedione antineoplastic agent used in advanced and metastatic androgen-refractory prostate cancer (PCa), seriously limits therapeutic success. METHODS: Xenografts from two human PCa cell lines (VCaP and CWR22) were established in male severe combined immunodeficiency mice, and MTX was administered, with or without concurrent castration, three times a week until tumors relapsed. Microarray technology was used to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in androgen-independent, MTX-resistant PCa xenografts. Gene expression profiles of MTX-treatment xenografts and their respective parental cell lines were performed using an Agilent whole human genome oligonucleotide microarray and analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. RESULTS: A total of 636 genes were differentially expressed (fold change ≥1.5; P<0.05) in MTX-resistant castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) xenografts. Of these, 18 were selected to be validated and showed that most of these genes exhibited a transcriptional profile similar to that seen in the microarray (Pearson's r=0.87). Western blotting conducted with a subset of genes deregulated in MTX-resistant CRPC tumors was shown through network analysis to be involved in androgen synthesis, drug efflux, ATP synthesis, and vascularization. CONCLUSION: The present data provide insight into the genetic alterations underlying MTX resistance in androgen-independent PCa and highlight potential targets to improve therapeutic outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Resistance to mitoxantrone (MTX), an anthracenedione antineoplastic agent used in advanced and metastatic androgen-refractory prostate cancer (PCa), seriously limits therapeutic success. METHODS: Xenografts from two human PCa cell lines (VCaP and CWR22) were established in male severe combined immunodeficiency mice, and MTX was administered, with or without concurrent castration, three times a week until tumors relapsed. Microarray technology was used to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in androgen-independent, MTX-resistant PCa xenografts. Gene expression profiles of MTX-treatment xenografts and their respective parental cell lines were performed using an Agilent whole human genome oligonucleotide microarray and analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. RESULTS: A total of 636 genes were differentially expressed (fold change ≥1.5; P<0.05) in MTX-resistant castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) xenografts. Of these, 18 were selected to be validated and showed that most of these genes exhibited a transcriptional profile similar to that seen in the microarray (Pearson's r=0.87). Western blotting conducted with a subset of genes deregulated in MTX-resistant CRPC tumors was shown through network analysis to be involved in androgen synthesis, drug efflux, ATP synthesis, and vascularization. CONCLUSION: The present data provide insight into the genetic alterations underlying MTX resistance in androgen-independent PCa and highlight potential targets to improve therapeutic outcomes.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most prevalent cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death among European and American men.1 Most patients presenting with advanced PCa have disease that is initially sensitive to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which successfully reduces tumor burden, improves symptoms, and can delay disease progression for several years.2,3 However, responses are not durable, and disease progression is inevitable. Mitoxantrone (MTX), a synthetic anthracenedione, has been routinely used for its palliative benefit and enhanced clinical remission alone or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of cancers.4–6 However, despite good initial response and survival benefits, most patients eventually develop resistance to this therapy.7The anti-neoplastic activity of MTX is believed to be related to its ability to bind DNA and inhibit DNA topoisomerase II, an essential enzyme in DNA synthesis and cell division, which is highly expressed in cancer cells.8 Numerous changes in the genetic makeup of tumor cells occur typically during acquisition of drug resistance.9 The advent of microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization has greatly expanded our ability to identify genes involved in tumor chemotherapy resistance, to predict treatment response, and to forecast prognosis. In this study, the diversity and magnitude of transcriptional responses to genotoxic damage induced by MTX were assessed in two castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) xenograft types and their parental cell lines using microarray-based gene expression profiling. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in MTX-resistant CRPC may facilitate improved screening and further our understanding of the mechanisms mediating PCa relapse, paving the way for the development of targeted interventions that circumvent treatment resistance.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The human VCaP and CWR22 PCa cell lines were obtained from Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science (Shanghai, China). Cells were cultured in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin, at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. Confluent cells were harvested with 0.05% trypsin/0.53 mM EDTA, centrifuged 5 minutes at 1,200 rpm, and resuspended in complete medium at 1×107 cells/mL. Aliquots of 0.1 mL were used for subcutaneous injection into CB-17 severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice (purchased from Guangzhou Provincial Medical Experimental Center).
Tumor inoculation and treatment
The animal study was carried out in a specific pathogen-free room and was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Zhengzhou University in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication no 80-23, revised 1996). Four- to six-week-old CB-17 male SCID mice were used in the experiments. Cells (1×106) were injected subcutaneously into both flanks resulting in two tumors per mouse. Once tumors became palpable, the mice were randomly divided into four treatment groups (six mice per group). In the first three groups, MTX was administered at 0.35, 1.0, and 3.5 mg/kg, respectively. The fourth group was treated with physiological saline (control) at the same time points. In another set of experiments, animals with palpable tumors were also assigned to one of four groups: MTX (3.5 mg/kg), castration, MTX (3.5 mg/kg) in combination with castration, and control. Surgical castration was performed after tumors had developed. In all experiments, MTX and saline were administered intragastrically in a 100 µL volume three times a week. Tumor diameters were measured with a caliper twice a week until the animals were sacrificed after 6 weeks of treatment. Tumor weight was calculated by the formula: tumor weight (mg) = (length×width2)/2.
RNA processing and microarray scanning
Total tumor RNA was extracted using Trizol reagent (Takara, Dalian, China), and concentrations determined by a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop; Nyxor Biotech, Paris, France). All the processes were carried out according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Enrichment of total RNA from samples was carried out using the RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen NV, Venlo, the Netherlands), and samples’ quality and quantity were assessed on a spectrophotometer. Briefly, 1 µg of total RNA from each sample was amplified and transcribed into fluorescent cRNA using the protocol provided with Agilent’s Quick Amp Labeling kit. Labeled cRNAs were hybridized onto the Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarray (4×44K; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in Agilent’s SureHyb Hybridization Chambers. Sample preparation and microarray hybridization were performed based on the manufacturer’s standard protocols, and the microarray procedure conformed to quality standards. Washes and scanning of the arrays were carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions. Images were autogridded, and the chemiluminescent signals were quantified, corrected for background at each spot, and spatially normalized. DEGs were identified through filtering the dataset using P<0.01 and a signal-to-noise ratio >2 for use in ANOVA statistical analysis. Three representative xenografts were chosen from each treatment cohort for the microarray experiments, and data are shown as mean values.
Gene expression data validation by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR)
qRT-PCR was performed with QPK-201 SYBR Green master mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and the ABI 7300 system from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The primers used in the study were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Thermocycling parameters included an room temperature step at 50°C for 20 minutes, followed by a DNA polymerase activation step at 95°C for 2 minutes and 50 PCR cycles (95°C for 20 seconds and 60°C for 30 seconds). All reactions were conducted in triplicate. Differential expression (fold change) for each gene was calculated using the comparative CT method.
Pathway enrichment and network construction
The GeneSpring GX software package (Agilent Technologies) was used to statistically analyze 636 DEGs. To assess the relationships between DEGs and signaling pathways, additional filtering (minimum three-fold change) was applied to extract the most relevant DEGs, which were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. Genes with known gene symbols and their corresponding expression values were uploaded into the software. Each gene symbol was mapped to its corresponding gene object in the Ingenuity Knowledge Base. Networks of these genes were algorithmically generated based on their connectivity.
Western blot analysis
Protein samples from total cell lysates were separated on 10% polyacrylamide resolving gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for 2 hours at 250 mA. Protein binding sites on membranes were blocked for 1 hour at 25°C in 5% (w/v) Marvel’s dried skimmed milk/PBS/3% (v/v) Tween-20 (PBST), then incubated overnight at 4°C with EPHA4, AKR1C3, HIF1A, and HSD17B12 monoclonal antibodies (1:1,000 dilution; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membranes were washed 3×10 minutes in tris buffered saline tween and probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Amersham Life Sciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) for 1 hour at 25°C. Following 3×10-minute washes in PBST, bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL+ reagents; Amersham Life Sciences). Densitometric quantification of band intensities was performed using Kodak one-dimensional image analysis software.
Statistical analyses
Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test of variance was performed to determine whether differences between groups were statistically significant, with P<0.05 set as threshold to indicate significance. SPSS 12.0 software was used for statistical analyses.
Results
MTX and androgen sensitivity testing
To investigate the sensitivity to MTX of human PCa cells in vivo, 106 PCa cells (from VCaP or CWR22 cell lines) were inoculated into the flanks of 5-week-old male CB-17 SCID mice to generate subcutaneous tumors. In general, palpable tumors developed 4–5 weeks after implantation. Once tumors grew to nearly 200 mm3, mice were treated intragastrically with different concentrations of MTX. Tumor volume and weight were measured twice weekly. As shown in Figure 1A and B, tumor volumes differed significantly between control and MTX-treated mice (P<0.01). MTX decreased tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner; although no significant effect was noted with the lowest dose, a 38.2% and 34.3% volume reduction was observed with 3.5 mg/kg MTX in VCaP and CWR22 xenografts, respectively. However, all mice eventually relapsed and tumors became resistant to MTX.
Figure 1
Tumor growth effect of a 6-week treatment with MTX and/or castration.
Notes: (A) Antitumor activities of different concentrations of MTX (control, 0.35, 1, and 3.5 mg/kg) in PCa xenograft mouse models. (B) Combined effects of androgen deprivation and MTX on PCa xenograft growth (P<0.015) (n=5 mice per group).
SCID mice with palpable PCa xenografts were castrated and treated with 3.5 mg/kg MTX to evaluate potential synergistic antitumor activities of androgen deprivation and MTX. This showed that VCaP and CWR22 were androgen dependent, and surgical castration led to a statistically significant (P<0.05) decrease in the tumor size of VCaP and CWR22 xenografts (Figure 1A and B). Although both VCaP and CWR22 xenografts are castration sensitive, these xenografts eventually developed to androgen-independent phenotype associated with regrowth. It demonstrated that tumor growth was significantly inhibited in castrated mice concurrently treated with MTX (P<0.01). As shown in Figure 1C and D, tumors of VCaP and CWR22 in the combination group were significantly smaller than those in the control group (P<0.01), the MTX-only group (P<0.05), and the castration-only group (P<0.05). Although significant reductions in median tumor size were recorded for the combination group on days 24, 35, 42, and 51, treatment resistance, evidenced by tumor regrowth, developed thereafter. All mice consistently maintained their body weight during each study.
Microarray-based identification of DEGs in MTX-resistant CRPC xenografts
Identification of DEGs between MTX-treatment xenografts and their parent PCa cell lines was carried out by microarray analysis on an Agilent Whole Human Genome Oligo Microarray platform. Comparative analysis was done after applying a strict threshold. We found that 636 genes were differentially expressed (P<0.05) in MTX-resistant CRPC xenografts. From these, we selected the top 20 upregulated and downregulated genes according to the log ratio expression values (Tables 1 and 2), and among these, the ones in the MTX-resistant CRPC groups whose expression levels were changed more than three fold (P<0.01) were compared with their parent groups. Upon comparison of DEGs from both xenografts (VCaPR and CWR22R), we found that nearly a quarter of the genes overlap.
Table 1
Top ten up- and downexpressed genes in xenograft of VCaP vs its parent cells
Primary accession
Gene symbol
Log2 ratio
Main function
NM_012445
SPON2
5.524
Antigen binding and lipopolysaccharide binding
NM_001099
ACPP
5.383
Protein homodimerization activity and phosphatase activity
NM_006998
SCGN
5.262
Calcium ion binding and cell proliferation
NM_002982
CCL2
4.853
Chemotactic activity for monocytes and basophils
NM_001618
PARP1
4.632
Poly(A) RNA binding and protein kinase binding
NM_000454
SOD1
4.354
Protein homodimerization activity and enzyme binding
NM_001353
AKR1C1
4.123
Oxidoreductase activity and oxidoreductase activity
NM_020783
SYT4
3.518
Ca(2+)-dependent exocytosis and dendrite formation
NM_000905
NPY
3.473
G-protein-coupled receptor activity and hormone activity
NM_002592
PCNA
3.216
Involved in the RAD6-dependent DNA repair pathway
NM_152703
SAMD9L
−3.074
Endosome fusion, and downregulation of growth factor signaling
NM_030763
HMGN5
−3.132
Preferentially binds to euchromatin and modulates cellular transcription
NM_012242
DKK1
−3.273
Signal transducer activity and low-density lipoprotein particle receptor binding
NM_00100839
GPX8
−3.452
Glutathione peroxidase activity
NM_004929
CALB1
−3.638
Calcium ion binding and vitamin D binding
NM_015163
TRIM9
−4.264
A member of tripartite motif family whose function has not been identified
NM_005978
S100A2
−4.316
Regulation of cellular processes, cell cycle progression, and differentiation
NM_001039492
FHL2
−4.817
Involved in the assembly of extracellular membranes
NM_175887
PRR15
−5.135
May have a role in cell proliferation and/or differentiation
NM_001753
CAV1
−5.237
A negative regulator of the Ras-p42/44 mitogen-activated kinase cascade
Table 2
Top ten up- and downexpressed genes in xenograft of CWR22R vs its parent cells
Primary accession
Gene symbol
Log2 ratio
Main function
NM_002996
CX3CL1
5.721
Receptor binding and chemokine activity
NM_001633
AMBP
5.635
Regulation of inflammatory and pathological processes
NM_000905
NPY
5.274
G-protein-coupled receptor activity and hormone activity
NM_004438
EPHA4
5.126
Identical protein binding and protein kinase activity
NM_001353
AKR1C1
4.823
Oxidoreductase activity and oxidoreductase activity
NM_018014
BCL11A
4.514
Protein homodimerization activity and RNA polymerase II sequence-specific DNA binding
NM_005233
EPHA3
4.465
Transferase activity and protein tyrosine kinase activity
BC005008
CEACAM6
3.917
Cell adhesion affects the sensitivity of tumor cells to adenovirus infection
NM_003295
TPT1
3.764
Poly(A) RNA binding and transcription factor binding
NM_014739
BCLAF1
3.693
BCL2-associated transcription factor and poly(A) RNA binding
NM_004653
KDM5D
−3.136
Oxidoreductase activity and histone demethylase activity
NM_148957
TNFRSF19
−3.417
Tumor necrosis factor-activated receptor activity
NM_004126
GNG11
−3.649
GTPase activity and signal transducer activity
NM_005141
FGB
−3.841
Receptor binding and chaperone binding
NM_004651
USP11
−4.132
Cysteine-type endopeptidase activity and thiol-dependent ubiquitinyl hydrolase activity
NM_001733
C1R
−4.545
Calcium ion binding and serine-type peptidase activity
NM_005613
RGS4
−4.674
GTPase activator activity and G-protein alpha-subunit binding
NM_130902
COX7B2
−5.529
Cytochrome-c oxidase activity
NM_012242
DKK1
−5.537
Signal transducer activity and low-density lipoprotein particle receptor binding
NM_006528
TFPI2
−5.746
Serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity and peptidase inhibitor activity
Validation of gene expression data by qRT-PCR and Western blotting
The expression patterns of four DEGs, EPHA4, AKR1C3, HIF1A, and HSD17B12, were evaluated by Western blot (Figure 2A) and qRT-PCR (Figure 2B). Results confirmed upregulated EPHA4, AKR1C3, and HSD17B12 expression in both VCaPR and CWR22R MTX-resistant CRPC xenografts. In contrast, HIF1A expression was markedly downregulated in both tumor types, compared with their respective parental cell lines. In addition, a panel of 18 DEGs with the highest and lowest expression differences between both VCaPR and CWR22R MTX-treatment xenografts and their parental cells lines was selected and tested by qRT-PCR (Figure 3A and B). Results showed that most of these genes exhibited a transcriptional profile similar to that seen in the microarray (Pearson’s correlation coefficient=0.87). Hence, the micro-array provided a reliable assessment of gene expression differences between MTX-treatment xenografts and their originating PCa cell lines.
Figure 2
Detection of EPHA4, AKR1C3, HIF1A, and HSD17B12 expression.
Notes: Expression data from VCaPR and CWR22R PCa xenografts from castrated, MTX-treated mice, and parental cell lines were assessed by Western blot (A) and qRT-PCR (B). EPHA4, AKR1C3, and HSD17B12 expression was significantly increased, whereas HIF1A expression was dramatically lower in the MTX-treatment xenografts compared to their parental cell lines (P<0.01).
qRT-PCR analysis of DEGs identified in the microarray.
Notes: Comparison of DEGs between PCa xenografts from castrated mice and parental cell lines. (A) CWR22R vs CWR22. (B) VCaPR vs VCaP. Expression data are represented by a log ratio calculated by comparing ΔCq from the xenograft with ΔCq from the parent cells. ΔCq was calculated as the difference between Cq of the targeted genes and Cq of the endogenous control gene, β-actin. Using this method, 16/18 (89%) genes pulled from the microarray analysis were confirmed to be differentially expressed by qRT-PCR.
By considering only probe sets common to both MTX-resistant PCa xenografts, 252 genes were qualified as network and function eligible by IPA. The DEGs identified in the two sets of data were then analyzed by the IPA library of canonical pathways. The ten most significant canonical pathways affected by these DEGs were mainly related to DNA replication, recombination, protein expression, and cell cycle (Figure 4A). Four pathways, namely PCa signaling, PI3K/AKT signaling, glioblastoma multiforme signaling, and PTEN signaling, involved in cellular growth, proliferation, and development, showed significant enrichment.
Figure 4
Pathway function enrichment and deregulated gene networks.
Notes: Representation of canonical pathways across the entire dataset; y-axis displays the significance. For ratios, taller bars indicate more genes associated with the canonical pathway (A). Deregulated gene networks in MTX-treatment xenografts (B and C). Red and green intensities indicate the degree of upregulation and downregulation, respectively. Genes in uncolored notes were not identified as differentially expressed and were integrated into the computationally generated networks based on evidence stored in the IPA knowledge memory, indicating a relevance to this network.
We further identified potential biological networks likely affected by these DEGs to better define how individual DEGs interact in specific pathways. Specifically, network 1 (Figure 4B) was centered on the T3-TR-RXR pathway, in which the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) act as heterodimers (TR-RXR) that preferentially bind thyroid hormone T3, activating gene transcription through coactivator recruitment. These gene products indirectly interact with an important nuclear receptor, NR1H4, for cell survival, proliferation, and upregulation of enzymes, including CYP17A1, AKR1C3, and AKR1C1/AKR1C2 involved in androgen synthesis. Network 2 (Figure 4C) is centered on the NF-κB pathway, associated with cell proliferation, differentiation, and DNA damage response. Here, several members of the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B (UGT2B) gene family, including UGT2B4, UGT2B10, UGT2B7, and UGT2B28, were highly upregulated. The UGT2B gene subfamily is involved in the metabolic clearance of numerous endogenous compounds, including bile acids and steroid hormones, as well as exogenous agents including various carcinogens and drugs.10,11 Apoptosis-related genes such as apoptosis 9, apoptosis 10, CYP27B1, and GPX1 were significantly downregulated in MTX-treatment xenografts and are also shown in the network. These DEGs are mainly associated with regulation of proliferation, gene expression, differentiation, and cell survival.
Discussion
Many molecular methods have been used in the attempt to elucidate the heterogeneous nature of PCa, determine the mechanisms behind its development, and propose new therapeutic and prognostic targets.12 Gene expression profiling or genome scale analysis has proven to be successful in various experimental settings and has the potential to highlight the dynamic molecular diversity encountered during tumor progression.13 Since studies investigating gene expression changes during progression of MTX-resistant CRPC are lacking, this study sought to identify DEGs in MTX refractory CRPC that may be exploited as specific prognostic and therapeutic targets.Microarray and bioinformatics analyses revealed overexpression of fractalkine, also known as chemokine (C-X3-C motif) ligand 1 (CX3CL1), in VCaPR and CWR22R xenografts. CX3CL1 is the only member recognized so far of the CX3C chemokine subfamily and was reported to participate in the regulation of cell adhesion, migration, and survival in human PCa cells by interacting with its receptor CX3CR1, primarily expressed on macrophages, circulating monocytes, and natural killer cells.14,15 Importantly, CX3CL1-CX3CR1 binding plays a crucial role in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), PCa progression, and skeletal metastasis,16 and was proposed to inhibit the apoptosis of cancer cells through MAPK/ERK activation.17The EPHA4 gene was also found to be highly upregulated in MTX-resistant CRPC xenografts. This gene belongs to the ephrin receptor subfamily of the protein-tyrosine kinase family. Ephrin ligands and receptors are differentially expressed on arteries and veins during development.18 Altered expression patterns of EPHA4/ephrins have been correlated with tumor invasiveness, vascularization, and metastatic potential.19 Moreover, high levels of EPHA4 mRNA correlate significantly with reduced overall survival in cancer patients.20We also observed overexpression of ABCG2, the subfamily G of the large human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily, in MTX-resistant VCaPR and CWR22R CRPC xenografts. ABCG2 forms homodimers or heterodimers with other members of the ABCG subfamily to function as an efflux transporter.21 ABCG2 is highly expressed in prostate stem cells and plays an important role in regulating intracellular androgen levels by mediating androgen efflux.22 Importantly, ABCG2 is also considered the main contributing factor to drug resistance in ovarian carcinoma xenografts.23 ABCG2 requires cellular ATP for transporting its substrates.24 Cytochrome c oxidase (COX) is a component of the respiratory chain complex involved in oxidative phosphorylation and ATP production.25 Accordingly, the upregulation of COX6c found in MTX-resistant VCaPR and CWR22R tumors might contribute to supply the large amount of ATP required by ABCG2 to pump MTX out of the cells.Deregulated AKR1C3 expression has been associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and other human cancers.26,27 The AKR enzymes comprise a functionally diverse gene family, with four AKR1C isoforms (AKR1C1–4) presently identified.28 Although low levels of AKR1C3 and AKR1C1 were observed in normal prostatic epithelium,29 this study showed significant upregulation of AKR1C3 in MTX-resistant PCa xenografts. Knuuttila et al30 suggested that castration induces the upregulation of AKR1C3 and other enzymes, such as CYP17A1 and HSD17B6, involved in estrogen and androgen metabolism; activates insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1 and Akt signaling; and promotes tumor angiogenesis and aggressiveness. In addition, AKR1C3 may also promote CRPC progression by activating 17β-estradiol-mediated signaling pathways.31Network analysis helped us obtain global and integrated molecular information about interactions between MTX-related DEGs. One important gene network was identified around the NF-κB gene. NF-κB is found in almost all animal cell types and is involved in cellular responses to stimuli such as stress, cytokines, free radicals, and ultraviolet irradiation.32–34 Deregulation of NF-κB signaling has been linked to cancer and inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.35,36 In relation to this network, we observed significant downregulation of the pro-apoptotic caspase-10 gene in MTX-treatment xenografts. Study indicated that caspase-10 mRNA expression decreased significantly in stage II colorectal cancer tissues that predict poor prognosis in patients.37 Dysregulation of CYP27B1 was also observed in the NF-κB signaling network. A study indicated that repression of CYP27B1 gene expression, mediated by interaction of GFI1 with other proteins to form a large protein complex, leads to cancer progression.38 Another study demonstrated that mRNA expression of CYP27B1 in the malignant breast tissue was lower, compared with that in the normal tissue and suggested that evaluating the mRNA expression levels of CYP27B1 may be useful for estimat ing the vitamin D anabolism and catabolism and risk of the progression of breast cancer. The carcinogenesis-related gene BCL11A, a DNA sequence-specific transcriptional repressor, was instead upregulated and interacted directly with NF-κB in the network. Overexpression of BCL11A may play a primary role in the pathogenesis of lymphoid malignancies,39 is correlated with advanced clinical N1/N2 lymphatic metastasis in patients,40 and was shown to be a prognostic factor for both overall survival and disease-free survival.41,42 In this study, BCL11A expression was dramatically higher in the MTX-treatment xenografts than in their parental cell lines; BCL11A was also overexpressed and play a positive role in several other types of human cancers such as NSCLC, breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma.43–45
Conclusion
Since some gene interactions may be specific of different cellular/experimental conditions, clinical validation of the present results is warranted. Nevertheless, this exploratory analysis may be useful to bestow a theranostic perspective to the current trend of research in PCa and to help identify molecular targets to overcome castration and MTX chemotherapy resistance.
Data availability
The data of the study have been deposited into the Research Data Deposit (http://www.researchdata.org.cn with the Approval Number asRDDB2018000383).
Authors: Prem P Dwivedi; Paul H Anderson; Wayne D Tilley; Brian K May; Howard A Morris Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2007-01-05 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: E Satterwhite; T Sonoki; T G Willis; L Harder; R Nowak; E L Arriola; H Liu; H P Price; S Gesk; D Steinemann; B Schlegelberger; D G Oscier; R Siebert; P W Tucker; M J Dyer Journal: Blood Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Abby C Collier; Natalie A Ganley; Malcolm D Tingle; Marion Blumenstein; Keith W Marvin; James W Paxton; Murray D Mitchell; Jeffrey A Keelan Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2002-02-01 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Nicholas J Davies; Rachel E Hayden; Paul J Simpson; Jane Birtwistle; Katarina Mayer; Jonathan P Ride; Chris M Bunce Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Yirong Li; Caihong X Li; Huihui Ye; Fei Chen; Jonathan Melamed; Yi Peng; Jinsong Liu; Zhengxin Wang; Hui C Tsou; Jianjun Wei; Paul Walden; Michael J Garabedian; Peng Lee Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2008-02-08 Impact factor: 5.310