Amy E Vincent1, Kathryn White2, Tracey Davey2, Jonathan Philips3, R Todd Ogden4, Conor Lawless3, Charlotte Warren1, Matt G Hall5, Yi Shiau Ng3, Gavin Falkous3, Thomas Holden3, David Deehan6, Robert W Taylor3, Doug M Turnbull7, Martin Picard8. 1. Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; MRC Centre for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 2. EM Research Services, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 3. Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. 5. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK; Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 6. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. 7. Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; MRC Centre for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: doug.turnbull@ncl.ac.uk. 8. Department of Psychiatry, Division of Behavioral Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology and Columbia Translational Neuroscience Initiative, H. Houston Merritt Center, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University Aging Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: martin.picard@columbia.edu.
Abstract
Genetic and biochemical defects of mitochondrial function are a major cause of human disease, but their link to mitochondrial morphology in situ has not been defined. Here, we develop a quantitative three-dimensional approach to map mitochondrial network organization in human muscle at electron microscopy resolution. We establish morphological differences between human and mouse and among patients with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diseases compared to healthy controls. We also define the ultrastructure and prevalence of mitochondrial nanotunnels, which exist as either free-ended or connecting membrane protrusions across non-adjacent mitochondria. A multivariate model integrating mitochondrial volume, morphological complexity, and branching anisotropy computed across individual mitochondria and mitochondrial populations identifies increased proportion of simple mitochondria and nanotunnels as a discriminant signature of mitochondrial stress. Overall, these data define the nature of the mitochondrial network in human muscle, quantify human-mouse differences, and suggest potential morphological markers of mitochondrial dysfunction in human tissues.
Genetic and biochemical defects of mitochondrial function are a major cause of human disease, but their link to mitochondrial morphology in situ has not been defined. Here, we develop a quantitative three-dimensional approach to map mitochondrial network organization in human muscle at electron microscopy resolution. We establish morphological differences between human and mouse and among patients with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diseases compared to healthy controls. We also define the ultrastructure and prevalence of mitochondrial nanotunnels, which exist as either free-ended or connecting membrane protrusions across non-adjacent mitochondria. A multivariate model integrating mitochondrial volume, morphological complexity, and branching anisotropy computed across individual mitochondria and mitochondrial populations identifies increased proportion of simple mitochondria and nanotunnels as a discriminant signature of mitochondrial stress. Overall, these data define the nature of the mitochondrial network in human muscle, quantify human-mouse differences, and suggest potential morphological markers of mitochondrial dysfunction in human tissues.
Mitochondria are multifunctional organelles that dynamically transition from
punctate structures to branched elongated tubules within cells. Continuous changes
in mitochondrial shape arise through fission and fusion of mitochondria.
Importantly, a bidirectional relationship links mitochondrial shape and function
(Liesa and Shirihai, 2013; Picard et al., 2013a). Changes in mitochondrial
shape in isolated cellular systems occur within minutes to hours and precede
signaling events in model systems, influencing skeletal muscle atrophy (Romanello et al., 2010), oxidative stress
(Shenouda et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2008), metabolic sensing (Ramírez et al., 2017; Schneeberger et al., 2013), and lifespan (Weiret al., 2017). This underscores the biological
significance of mitochondrial morphology transitions for cellular and organismal
functions (Eisner et al., 2018) and
emphasizes the need to visualize and quantify mitochondrial shapes to gain insight
into the relevance of mitochondrial morphology for human health and disease.One tissue that exhibits high energy consumption and contains a large number
of mitochondria is skeletal muscle. Building on initial qualitative imaging
revealing highly reticular mitochondrial networks in rodents (Bakeeva et al., 1978; Ogata and Yamasaki, 1997) and live cell imaging approaches to quantify
mitochondrial morphology (Koopman et al.,
2005), a quantitative method was developed allowing quantification of
mitochondrial size and shape in two dimensions (Picard et al., 2013b). However, mitochondria exhibit complex
three-dimensional and anisotropic arrangement (i.e., different morphology when
measured in different orientation) in various cell types. This is particularly
salient in skeletal muscle, as subsequently described in mice (Eisner et al., 2014; Glancy et al., 2015; Leduc-Gaudet et
al., 2015; Picard et al., 2013b),
but the morphological 3D characteristics of human mitochondria have not been
described.Consistent with their bacterial ancestry, mitochondria contain their own
genome, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which encodes essential components of the
respiratory chain and oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system required for ATP
synthesis (Nicholls and Fergusson, 2013).
Clinically, mtDNA mutations have been widely implicated in human disease and aging
(Gorman et al., 2016; Nunnari and Suomalainen, 2012; Suomalainen and Battersby, 2018). In cellular and animal
models, mtDNA mutations (Koopman et al.,
2010; Picard et al., 2014), impaired
Ca2+ handling (Eisner et al.,
2017), and disrupted mitochondrial dynamics due to autosomal defects in
the fusion-fission components (Ranieri et al.,
2013) all perturb mitochondrial morphology. Furthermore, in human
skeletal muscle fibers, mtDNA mutations that compromise mitochondrial energy
production are also associated with ultrastructural abnormalities in mitochondrial
cristae organization (Vincent et al., 2016),
suggesting that mitochondrial morphology and function are also linked in
vivo. However, the quantitative relationship between mtDNA defects,
mitochondrial morphology, and mitochondrial organization in human disease remains
unclear.To clarify this relationship, we developed a quantitative approach to analyze
3D skeletal muscle mitochondrial network organization at single organelle resolution
in human muscle biopsies. We provide quantitative analysis of mitochondrial
morphology in human muscle, perform a comparative mouse-human analysis, and evaluate
the effect of mtDNA mutations in patients with genetically confirmed primary mtDNA
mutations on morphological parameters. We also use a combination of multivariate
analyses to identify key mitochondrial morphology characteristics of the myopathic
mitochondrial network, providing a foundation to examine and monitor anomalies in
muscle mitochondrial networks.
RESULTS
We imaged biopsy specimens from healthy volunteers (n = 8) by serial block
face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM). The resolution achieved here with
SBF-SEM is 10 nm in the x/y plane and 30 nm in the z plane, which typically enables
visualization of individual cristae membranes. This is inferior to conventional
transmission EM imaging but superior to other three-dimensional light-based imaging
methods (Dahl et al., 2015; Eisner et al., 2014; Picard et al., 2013b). Because our objective was to establish the
morphology of individual mitochondria within the skeletal muscle network, we opted
for a method with sufficient resolution to resolve closely juxtaposed (approximately
≥ 20 nm) membranes, which is critical to avoid merging immediately adjacent
organelles with distinct outer mitochondrial membranes (Figure S1).To test our approach in human skeletal muscle, we first analyzed coexisting
mitochondrial sub-populations known to markedly differ in both morphology and
function (Ferreira et al., 2010; Picard et al., 2013b). The subsarcolemmal (SS)
mitochondria reside beneath the plasma membrane, often in proximity to myonuclei
(i.e., perinuclear) and capillaries (i.e., perivascular) (Glancy et al., 2014), and are generally globular in
morphology, with few branches. On the other hand, the intermyofibrillar (IMF)
mitochondria are located between myofibrils arranged in pairs at the z-band of each
sarcomere (Vendelin et al., 2005) and have
elongated tubular shapes when imaged in 2D along the transverse plane of the muscle
in rodents (Figure 1A; Picard et al., 2013b).
Figure 1.
Imaging and Quantitative Analysis of Mitochondrial Morphology and Volume in
IMF and SS Mitochondrial Subpopulations in Human Skeletal Muscle
(A) Electron micrograph of human skeletal muscle in transverse (i.e.,
cross section) orientation. A single cell is highlighted (yellow), with
corresponding higher magnification images of intermyofibrillar (IMF) and
subsarcolemmal (SS) mitochondria. Note the difference in morphology between IMF
and SS mitochondrial sub-populations.
(B) Z stack at EM resolution from serial block face scanning electron
microscopy (SBF-SEM) used for 3D reconstructions. See Video S1 for animation. Total
imaging depth is 12 μm.
(C) The human mitochondrial network was reconstructed and shown here in
transverse (top view) and longitudinal (side view) orientations. Each
mitochondrion is a different color.
(D) The spectrum of human IMF and SS mitochondrial shapes and volumes,
ranked left to right from smallest to largest.
(E) Schematic of a skeletal muscle fiber and the different sarcomeric
planes. The mitochondrial branching index (MBI) is used to quantify the relative
branching in the transverse and longitudinal orientations. Trans, transverse;
Long, longitudinal.
(F) Two reconstructed mitochondria from SBF-SEM seen in both transverse
and longitudinal orientations. The orange mitochondrion (left) is longer and
more branched in the longitudinal orientation of the muscle fiber (i.e.,
columnar), whereas the red mitochondrion (right) is more extensively branched in
the transverse orientation (i.e., in cross section). This branching anisotropy
is captured by each mitochondrion’s MBI value.
For each region of interest, 400 serial images were captured at 30 nm
intervals in the transverse orientation (Figure
1B; Video S1).
Approximately 50 individual SS or IMF mitochondria were manually traced from each
image stack and 3D reconstructions generated. In all human and mouse fibers
analyzed, the mitochondrial network was found not to be a single reticulum. Rather,
the mitochondrial network is composed of largely distinct organelles rarely reaching
beyond a few microns in length in either direction, with the highest density of
mitochondria at each of the sarcomeric planes (Video S1; Figure 1C). Reconstructions also confirmed that SS mitochondria tend to
be globular and possess branches only where they project into the IMF space (Video S2), representing
possible sites of physical interactions or their migration toward the IMF
compartment.
Establishing Quantitative Metrics of Three-Dimensional Shape Complexity and
Branching Direction
To determine whether mitochondrial shapes significantly differ between
cells, individuals, species, and in response to mtDNA defects, a quantitative
measure of morphological complexity is required. We therefore adapted the
two-dimensional metric known as form factor (FF) (Koopman et al., 2005) to a threedimensional metric of
mitochondrial shape complexity. We call this the mitochondrial complexity index
(MCI; see STAR Methods for details). The
MCI is analogous to sphericity and scales with mitochondrial shape complexity,
including branches and increased surface area relative to volume. Simulations on
basic 3D models confirmed that MCI is insensitive to mitochondrial volume, such
that mitochondria of the same shape but of different volumes have the same MCI
(Figure S2).Because mitochondria exchange molecular information with each other via
fusion (Chen et al., 2010), a process that
could influence the spread of mtDNA defects along mitochondrial branches in
genetic mitochondrial disease, we also sought to develop a method to assess
mitochondrial branching in either the transverse (i.e., across the muscle fiber)
or longitudinal (i.e., along the fiber) orientation (Figures S3A and S3B). The ratio of
quantified transverse/longitudinal branching yielded the mitochondrial branching
index (MBI) (Figure 1E). Mitochondria with
equal branching in both orientations have an MBI of 1; those with greater
branching in the transverse plane score > 1, and those more branched
along the length of the muscle fiber score < 1 (Figure 1F). Together, the MCI and MBI represent
quantitative metrics to evaluate individual mitochondrial morphology in healthy
humans, across species, and in disease.
Biopsy to Fixation Delay Does Not Impact Mitochondrial Morphology
Gaining the most clinically relevant insights into human cell biological
processes requires the study of human tissues, but there are limitations
associated with clinical studies. In live cultured cells and ex
vivo, mitochondria undergo fusion events within minutes (Eisner et al., 2014) and morphology
transitions occur in seconds to minutes (Liu et
al., 2009). Therefore, it is conceivable that mitochondrial
morphology would shift during the delay necessarily encountered between the
biopsy of human muscle and subsequent fixation. To directly test this
possibility, we compared muscle mitochondrial morphology when it was either (1)
fixed in vivo without any delay via transcardial perfusion or
(2) fixed by immersion following a 1 h post-mortem delay, in the mouse tibialis
anterior (Figure 2). SBF-SEM image stacks
were acquired as for human biopsies and high-resolution 3D models generated.
Figure 2.
Mitochondrial Morphology Differs between Healthy Humans and Mice
(A) Electron micrograph and 3D reconstruction of mitochondria in mouse
tibialis anterior muscle. Muscle was fixed in two ways: by immersion after a
delay at room temperature (left) and via transcradial perfusion without delay
(right). Scale bars, 1 μm.
(B and C) IMF mitochondrial volume (B) and MCI (C) in mouse muscle fixed
by transcardial perfusion (orange) and immersion (pink) fixation shown as
cumulative frequency distributions. Each line represents data from 150
mitochondria sampled across 3 muscle fibers in each animal. n = 3 mice per
group.
(D) Mitochondrial volume and (E) MCI in healthy humans (blue) and mice
(orange) shown as cumulative frequency distributions. n = 6 mice and 8
humans.
(F) Average MCI for human and mouse IMF mitochondria. Data are means
± SEM; n = 875 in mouse and 1,180 in humans, linear mixed model.
(G) Bivariate plot of volume and MCI for healthy human controls (blue)
and mice (orange). Each point represents a single mitochondrion.
Three-dimensional reconstructions showed no significant difference
between fixation methods (Figure 2A).
Complex shaped mitochondria with branches >1 μm in length could be
observed in equal abundance with both immediate and delayed fixation. Likewise,
neither mitochondrial volume nor MCI values differed significantly across
fixation conditions (Figures 2B and 2C),
demonstrating that fixation delay does not result in loss of morphological
complexity within an hour ex vivo. These results demonstrate
that the mitochondrial network organization can be studied in fixed biopsy
specimens.
Mouse and Human Mitochondrial Morphology Differ
Qualitatively, the 3D human mitochondrial network (Figure 1C) appeared less interconnected than previous
reports have demonstrated in mice (Glancy et
al., 2015), but mitochondrial morphology had not previously been
quantified and compared across mouse and human. We therefore quantified
mitochondrial volume and MCI in parallel from both species. Mitochondrial
populations were analyzed using cumulative frequency distributions that
illustrate the relative abundance of mitochondria with different volume or MCI
values (Figures 2D and 2E).Mouse IMF mitochondria were 144.0% larger on average than in healthy
humans (p = 0.0019) (Figure 2F) but did not
differ on average in MCI (p = 0.69) (Figure
2G). In mice, the top 10% largest mitochondria had an average volume
of 4.19 μm3, compared to only 0.68 μm3 for
human mitochondria. Similarly, SS or perinuclear mitochondria were on average
412.0% larger (p < 0.0001) but also 31.0% less complex (p = 0.014)
compared to those in healthy humans (Figure S4). Thus, mitochondrial
volume, and to a lesser extent the complexity of SS mitochondria, differ
significantly differ between mouse and human.
Intermyofibrillar Mitochondria Are More Complex than Subsarcolemmal
Mitochondria
In healthy human muscle, volume for SS and IMF mitochondria were
relatively similar. IMF mitochondria were on average 77.2% larger than SS
mitochondria (p < 0.0001), largely due to a lower proportion of small IMF
mitochondria (Figure 3A). In comparison,
the MCI for human IMF mitochondria was 118.0% greater than for SS mitochondria
(p < 0.0001), a difference largely attributable to a substantial
proportion of highly complex IMF mitochondria, and a complete absence of SS
mitochondria with MCI > 7.5 (Figure
3A).
Figure 3.
Natural Variation in Mitochondrial Volume and Complexity in Healthy Human
Skeletal Muscle
(A) Population distribution of mitochondrial volume and MCI in control
human muscle shown as cumulative frequency distributions for SS and IMF
mitochondria. Insets: mean values ± SEM; n = 346 for SS and 1,180 for
IMF, linear mixed model. (Right) Representative 3D reconstructions of
mitochondrial subpopulations.
(B) Example 3D reconstructions of two muscle cells from the same person
(Control 1).
(C and D) Cumulative population distributions of mitochondrial volume
(C) and MCI (D) in three muscle fibers from Control 1, and (inset) with means
± SEM for each cell. Each line represents 50 IMF mitochondria from a
single muscle cell.
(E) Example 3D reconstructions from muscle fibers from two different
individuals (Controls 1 and 2) illustrating between-person (i.e.,
inter-individual) differences.
(F and G) Cumulative frequency distribution demonstrating between-person
variation in volume (F) and MCI (G) in 8 healthy individuals. Each line
represents 150 IMF mitochondria sampled across 3 muscle fibers for each
person.
(H and I) Coefficient of variation (C.V.) for volume (H) and MCI (I) in
healthy controls(C) and patients (P). C.V.
values are shown between mitochondria within single cells (n = 18–24
cells), between the mean values across fibers (n = 6–8 individuals), and
between-person across healthy control and mito disease groups(n = total of 1,180
and 900 IMF mitochondria in controls and patients, respectively). Data shown are
mean ± SEM.
(J) Karyotype-like arrangement of 50 individual reconstructed IMF
mitochondria from a single muscle fiber of patient 5 (asymptomatic sister with
m.8344A>G), from the lowest to the highest MCI (left to right).
See Figure S4
for larger version and Video
S3 for an animation of the source muscle fiber.
The MCI population distribution also showed a higher level of kurtosis
and skewness (kurtosis = 37.09, skewness = 4.88, n = 1201) for IMF mitochondria
than for SS mitochondria (kurtosis = 27.14, skewness = 4.02, n = 344), possibly
suggesting the existence of structural or other factors that constrain
morphology, particularly in the IMF compartment.SS mitochondria in patients with mitochondrial disease were on average
147.0% larger than those in healthy controls (p = 0.0076) but showed no
difference on average in complexity (p = 0.50). Because the IMF compartment is
the predominant compartment in muscle fibers, and given previous work showing
that IMF are more responsive than SS mitochondria to metabolic perturbations
such as exercise (Picard et al., 2013b),
aging (Leduc-Gaudet et al., 2015), and
metabolic oversupply (Picard et al.,
2015a), we focused the remainder of our analyses on IMF
mitochondria.Next, we determined the degree of variation in IMF mitochondrial volume
and MCI at different levels: (1) between mitochondria within single muscle
fibers, (2) between fibers of a given individual, and (3) between different
individuals (Figures 3B–3I).
Variation in mitochondrial volume and MCI within muscle fibers of healthy
controls was highest with an estimated coefficient of variation (C.V.) ranging
from 56% to 243% for volume and from 34% to 131% for MCI. Standard deviation
determined from linear multi-level models showed similar results for both volume
(SD = 0.81) and MCI (SD = 0.68). These numbers illustrate the remarkable
population heterogeneity and diversity of 3D mitochondrial volumes and shapes
within human muscle fibers. The diversity of a cell’s IMF mitochondria is
illustrated in a mito-otype (Figure
3J)—the mitochondrial equivalent to a karyotype of nuclear
chromosomes (see Figure
S5 for full size rendering).Comparatively, differences in mean volume and MCI between muscle fibers
of a given individual were more limited, with cell-to-cell C.V. ranging from 21%
to 32% for volume and 14% to 65% for MCI (Figures
3B–3D). Again, standard deviation yielded a similar result for
both volume (SD = 0.14) and MCI (SD = 0.26). Variability between healthy
controls was surprisingly large and most pronounced for MCI (Figures 3E–3G). When combining all cells
together and comparing the averages between individuals, the C.V. was 38% for
volume (Figure 3H) and 59% for MCI (Figure 3I) and had a SD of 0.28 for volume
and 0.43 for MCI. These data establish that considerable intra- and
inter-individual differences exist in mitochondrial size and morphological
complexity in humans, with variability in both volume and MCI being highest
intracellularly (among mitochondria of a given cell), and lowest between cells
of a given person.Interestingly, the within-person variation in MCI was approximately two
times greater than for volume (SD = 0.26 versus 0.14; Mann-Whitney, p <
0.0001). Moreover, the average MCI across muscle fibers of a given individual
varied by as much as 65%, a phenomenon likely attributable to the mixed muscle
fiber composition in human muscle (Gouspillou et
al., 2014), which show different mitochondrial properties (Mishra et al., 2015). The greater variation
in MCI than in volume also suggested that morphological complexity may be more
sensitive to biochemical deficiency and inter-individual differences than
volume. Therefore, we mainly focused our subsequent analyses on MCI.
Patients with mtDNA Defects Have More “Simple” Fragmented
Mitochondria than Healthy Controls
We studied six patients with mtDNA disease including: single,
large-scale mtDNA deletion (n = 2), m.8344A>G tRNALys (n = 3),
and m.3243A>GLeu(URR) (n = 1) (Table S1). These are among the most
common disease-causing mtDNA defects (Gorman et
al., 2015). As in healthy controls, MCI showed substantial intra- and
inter-individual variability in patients with mitochondrial disease (Figure 4). The within fiber C.V. for MCI was
11%-170% (SD = 0.69), similar to controls (p = 0.72). In general, mitochondrial
MCI and volume for patient mitochondria fall within the upper and lower limits
of healthy controls, with a subset of fibers having a lower range in MCI values
(Figure S6, e.g.,
patients 2 and 4).
Figure 4.
IMF Mitochondrial Volume and MCI in Patients with mtDNA Disease
(A) Cumulative frequency distribution for MCI in combined healthy
controls and patients. Each line in the patients represents 150 IMF mitochondria
across 3 muscle fibers. Inset shows mean ± SEM for each person. Controls
(n = 8) combined n = 1180 mitochondria.
(B) Schematic illustrating “simple” and
“complex” mitochondria defined as the 10th and
90th percentile of the control population distribution,
respectively (shaded yellow regions).
(C) Proportion of IMF mitochondria with MCI values that fall below the
10th (simple) or above the 90th (complex) percentiles
of the control population for healthy controls (black) and patients 1–6
with mitochondrial disease.
(D) Bivariate plot of MCI and volume for all healthy control IMF
mitochondria (blue, n = 1,180) and mitochondrial disease (green, n = 900). Each
data point represents a mitochondrion. Dotted lines denote the 10th
and 90th percentiles of the control population. Simple mitochondria
include 10% of mitochondria in the healthy controls and 46% in patients (blue
shading). Large mitochondria include 10% of mitochondria in controls and 14% in
patients (orange shading).
(E) Mitochondrial volume density calculated as the proportion of muscle
volume occupied by mitochondria. n = 8 controls and 6 patients, Mann-Whitney
test, N.S. Data shown are mean ± SEM.
(F) Mitochondrial branching index (MBI = Cross sectional ranching
indicator/Longitudinal branching indicator) in combined controls (n = 973 IMF
mitochondria), patients (n = 896) and mice (n = 839). Note that the number of
mitochondria that are more branched cross sectionally (red) is greater than
those more branched longitudinally (purple) in all three groups. Image stacks
with imperfect orientation precluded reliable analyses of branching orientation
for some mitochondria, which were excluded, explaining the lower total number of
mitochondria quantified here.
Compared to healthy controls, mitochondria in patients were on average
39.6% less complex (p = 0.036) (Figure 4A).
However, the MCI population distributions differed considerably in the abundance
of “simple” (below the 10th percentile of the control
population) or “complex” (above the 90th percentile of
the control population) mitochondria. Mitochondria exist as functionally
interconnected populations and only a portion of the overall population may
respond to bioenergetic perturbations (Saunders
et al., 2013). To capture these changes, we quantified the proportion
of simple and complex mitochondria as shown in Figure 4B. Except for patient 2 who had a similar proportion of
simple mitochondria as controls (9.33% versus 10%), 46% of mitochondria in
patients with mtDNA defects were simple. This represents a 3.6-fold elevation in
the proportion of simple mitochondria relative to healthy controls (Figures 4C and 4D).
Mitochondrial Volume Density Does Not Account for Differences in MCI
MCI differences could theoretically be accounted for by variation in the
overall density of mitochondria where more densely packed mitochondria may have
more interconnections. We therefore measured mitochondrial volume density,
defined as the percentage of muscle fiber volume occupied by mitochondria, in 3D
reconstructed models over two full sarcomeres. Mitochondrial volume density was
elevated in two patients but on average was not significantly different between
patients (4.0%) and controls (2.6%) (p = 0.534) (Figure 4E). Across controls and patients, volume density was also
not related to average MCI within a cell (Pearson r2 = 0.097, p =
0.19), which excluded the possibility that differences in MCI were driven by
mitochondrial volume density. Taken together, these data from healthy controls
and patients with mitochondrial disease demonstrate that mitochondrial
dysfunction due to mtDNA mutations is associated with a shift in mitochondrial
complexity independent of mitochondrial volume density.
The Mitochondrial Network Is Anisotropic
MCI is agnostic to the orientation of individual mitochondria within the
skeletal muscle fiber. However, clonally expanded mtDNA defects are thought to
progress longitudinally along muscle fibers (Bua
et al., 2006; Campbell et al.,
2014) and we have recently reported that mtDNA dysfunction appears to
preferentially spread in the transverse orientation prior to longitudinal
propagation (Vincent et al., 2018). One
potential mechanism for the cytoplasmic propagation of mtDNA mutations is the
transmission of mtDNA molecules through fused mitochondria within the network.
However, the relative connectivity of mitochondria in either transverse and
longitudinal orientations, or mitochondrial “anisotropy,” has not
previously been defined.Mitochondria are organized at z-bands and occasionally extend in the
longitudinal orientation to span a full sarcomere (see Video S3). In healthy controls,
3.3% of mitochodnria spanned a full sarcomere, compared to 4.9% (p = 0.07) in
patients with mitochondrial disease. In contrast, mouse skeletal muscle contains
a significantly larger fraction of columnar mitochondria that extend in the
longitudinal axis, resulting in 18.9% of organelles spanning at least one
sarcomere.To precisely quantify the degree of mitochondrial connectivity in
different orientations, we computed the MBI (see Figure 1E) for all IMF mitochondria. In healthy controls,
approximately half (50.6%) of mitochondria were equally branched in both
directions (Figure 4F). However, there were
∼4.4 times more mitochondria that are more extensively branched in the
transverse orientation (40.4%) compared to the longitudinal orientation (9.1%)
(Figure 4F). In mitochondrial disease,
a similar percentage (51.0%) mitochondria were equally branched in both
directions and a smaller fraction (36.2%) exhibited more branching in the
transverse orientation (Figure 4F).
Together, these data show that mitochondrial network connectivity across the
plane of each z-band is approximately 4-fold greater than connectivity along the
muscle fibers (see complete 3D reconstructions in Video S3) and that mtDNA defects
may promote transverse mitochondrial branching within individual sarcomeric
planes.We next determined whether branching direction differed between humans
and mice. Compared to healthy humans, mice had a smaller (30.2%) proportion of
mitochondria equally branched in both orientations, and more mitochondria with
extensive branching in both the transverse (54.7%) and longitudinal (15.1%)
orientations. Mice have significantly more mitochondria with predominant
branching in transverse (54.7% versus 40.4%, 1.35-fold of controls) and
longitudinal (15.1% versus 9.1%, 1.66-fold) orientations than human mitochondria
(Figure 4F). These quantitative data
demonstrate that mouse skeletal muscle harbors a substantially different
mitochondrial connectivity pattern than human muscle.
High Mutation Load Is Associated with Mitochondrial Fragmentation
Within the group of patients with mitochondrial disease studied here, we
had the opportunity to study samples from a trio of genetically related patients
with the m.8344A>G tRNALys mutation (Figure 5A, Videos S4, S5, and S6). The mother (patient 4) was 50
years old with 63% mutation load and showed a mild myopathy. Her eldest daughter
(patient 3) was 22 years old, with skeletal muscle mutation load of 97%, severe
myopathy, and exercise intolerance. In comparison, her younger daughter (patient
5) was 20 years old with only 40% mutation load in the muscle and was clinically
asymptomatic. Given the genetic relatedness of these individuals, the similar
age of the sisters, and the markedly different mtDNA heteroplasmy between them,
this provided an opportunity to evaluate the association between mtDNA mutation
load and mitochondrial morphology.
Figure 5.
Variability in Mitochondrial Morphology in Three Family Members with Variable
Levels of the m.8344A>G Mutation
(A) Pedigree of three related female patients. Patient 3 (orange): the
proband with 97% heteroplasmy, 97% COX-deficient muscle fibers, and severe
myopathy and exercise intolerance; patient 4 (blue): the affected mother with
63% heteroplasmy, 22% COX-deficient muscle fibers, and mild myopathy; and
patient 5 (green): the unaffected sister with 40% heteroplasmy and some
intermediate COX-deficient fibers. The sisters are of comparable age but have
inherited different levels of mtDNA mutation.
(B-D) Single representative section from SBF-SEM and reconstruction of
50 IMF mitochondria in muscle fibers for of patients 4 (B), 3 (C), and 5 (D).
Note the small fragmented morphology in the proband and mother (B and C) and a
high number of branched mitochondria in the unaffected sister, who has
intermediate mtDNA mutation load (D). Scale bars, 1 μm.
(E) Proportion of simple and complex IMF mitochondria (based on the
10th and 90th percentiles of the MCI distributions in
healthy controls) for patients 3, 4, and 5 compared to the healthy individuals.
ND, no detectable complex mitochondria.
(F) Bivariate plot of MCI and mitochondrial volume in the three
individuals with the m.8344A>G mutation. Shaded areas illustrate the
mitochondrial population distribution for each patient. Each data point is a
mitochondrion (n = 150 per individual).
The 3D reconstructions for all three patients showed dramatic
differences associated with heteroplasmy. Both the mother (patient 4) and the
most severely affected daughter (patient 3) had the highest level of
“simple” fragmented rounded mitochondria in this cohort: 71.3% and
78.7% of all mitochondria, respectively, compared to 10% in controls (Figures 5B and 5C, Videos S4 and S5). This is in sharp contrast to
mitochondrial network architecture in healthy controls and in the unaffected
sister (patient 5; Figure 5D and Video S6), the latter
showing a large number of complex mitochondria.The unaffected sister (patient 5, 40% heteroplasmy) was the only member
of the family to have any complex mitochondria (7.3%), many of which had very
high MCI values reflecting extensive branching and nanotunnels (Figure 5E). This patient also had 2.6 times more small
mitochondria than controls, resulting in substantial heterogeneity of both MCI
and volume (Figure 5F) associated with this
intermediate level of mtDNA heteroplasmy.
Mitochondrial Nanotunnels Are More Frequent in Patients than Controls
Mitochondrial nanotunnels are thin double membrane projections of both
outer (OMM) and inner (IMM) mitochondrial membranes connecting two non-adjacent
mitochondria and capable of transporting proteins between connected organelles
(Figures 6A–6C; Eisner et al., 2014, 2017; Vincent et al., 2017).
There is no previous systematic analysis of nanotunnel size and frequency in
human tissues.
Figure 6.
Prevalence and Anatomy of Mitochondrial Nanotunnels in Human Skeletal
Muscle
(A) Transmission Electron Microscopy of skeletal muscle from patient 5,
with mitochondria harboring nanotunnels (pseudocolored blue). Arrows indicate
nanotunnel shafts.
(B and C) Image stack from SBF-SEM (B) and three-dimensional
reconstruction (C) of a mitochondrion with two nanotunnels (arrows). Slice
thickness is 30 nm.
(D) Frequency of nanotunnels per 100 mitochondria in healthy controls
and individuals with mtDNA disease. All controls (n = 8) were compared to all
patients (n = 6), n = 399 nanotunnels, Mann-Whitney.
(E and F) A mitochondrion with two nanotunnels reconstructed in
Microscopy Image Browser (E) and schematic illustrating the measurements of
nanotunnel anatomy obtained from 3D reconstructions (F). The internal diameter
is derived from the external diameter (see I).
(G and H) Frequency distribution of nanotunnel length (G) and diameter
(H) as assessed from reconstructions measured in Amira (n = 362). Distributions
are positively skewed.
(I) Frequency distribution of minimum estimated lumen diameter for each
nanotunnel measured by subtracting distances for the combined thickness of the
intermembrane space, OMM, and IMM from the measured external diameter. The red
dotted line indicates the estimated dimension of mtDNA nucleoids (based on
bovine heart high-resolution imaging; Kukat et
al., 2011). Inset: proportion of mitochondrial nanotunnels whose
lumens are >110 nm, indicating the theoretical proportion of nanotunnels
that could potentially house or transport nucleoids (right of red dashed line).
Estimates based on n = 362 nanotunnels.
Using SBF-SEM, we identified nanotunnels in both the transverse and
longitudinal orientation. In healthy controls, there was on average 2.1
nanotunnels per 100 mitochondria (Figure
6D). In comparison, patients with mitochondrial disease showed an average
of 38 nanotunnels per 100 mitochondria, representing an 18.1-fold greater
frequency (p < 0.01) (Figure 6D). It
should be noted that patients 3 and 4 (the mother and eldest daughter with
m.8344A>G mutation), despite exhibiting a massively fragmented
mitochondrial network, still had an equal or greater nanotunnel frequency than
most controls.Mitochondrial nanotunnels can exist in two forms: as free-ended membrane
protrusions arising from a donor mitochondrion or as connecting nanotunnels
joining two mitochondria (Vincent et al.,
2017). Of the 399 nanotunnels analyzed in mtDNA disease biopsies,
19.0% were free-ended membrane protrusions whereas 81.0% were connected to
mitochondria at both ends.We then determined their dimensions with measurements performed in Amira
from high-resolution 3D reconstructions generated in microscopy image browser
(MIB) (Figures 6E and 6F). Previous
estimates of human mitochondrial nanotunnel dimensions were solely based on 2D
single-plane transmission EM images (Vincent et
al., 2017). Here, human skeletal muscle nanotunnels ranged from 64.9
nm to 2.0 μm in length (Figure 6G).
The external diameters ranged from 26.1 to 204.2 nm (Figure 6H), dimensions similar to mitochondria-derived
vesicles (Cadete et al., 2016; Soubannier et al., 2012).To determine whether mitochondrial nanotunnels could theoretically
transport mutant mitochondrial nucleoids or exhibit cargo selectivity, we
estimated the smallest nanotunnel matrix lumen, which would theoretically limit
the diffusion of macromolecules. We measured the smallest external diameter for
each nanotunnel and subtracted 24 nm (8 nm for each the intermembrane space,
plus 2 nm for OMM and IMM, multiplied by 2 sides). The distribution of estimated
nanotunnel lumen size ranged from 2.1 to 180.2 nm (Figure 6I)—almost two orders of magnitude. Given that
nucleoids are believed to be approximately 110 nm in size (Kukat et al., 2011), this limited structural evidence
suggests that only 4.1% of nanotunnels measured in human muscle would be wide
enough to allow the transport of mtDNA packaged as nucleoids. This point is in
definite need of empirical validation.
Key Mitochondrial Morphological Features Can Distinguish Patients from
Controls
Finally, we sought to determine whether there are consistent
mitochondrial morphological features that differentiate healthy controls from
patients with mitochondrial disease. To test this hypothesis in an unbiased
manner, we assembled a list of morphological features extracted from single
mitochondria and population distributions, including the percentage of simple,
complex, small, and large mitochondria (as described above), median MCI and
volume, mitochondrial volume density, and mitochondrial nanotunnel
frequency.We used partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) to
integrate morphological parameters into a single multivariate model that aims to
maximize group differences (healthy controls versus mitochondrial disease). The
model captured 46% of the total variance in the dataset and achieved partial
separation of controls and patients with a small degree of overlap in the 95%
confidence intervals (Figure 7A). Rank
ordering of the variable importance in projection (VIP) scores for each
parameter identified the most important morphological features that discriminate
between healthy controls and mitochondrial disease. The top two features were
(1) the abundance of nanotunnels and (2) the proportion of simple mitochondria
(Figure 7B). As a validation of this
result, the same two features were identified using another machine
learning-based classifier, support vector machine (SVM), which similarly
classifies data into two groups and provides estimates for the importance for
each variable in the model (Ben-Hur et al.,
2008). Plotting together the percentage of simple mitochondria
against the abundance of nanotunnels resulted in complete segregation of healthy
controls and patients (Figure 7C). These
analyses, albeit underpowered, suggest that a high proportion of morphologically
simple mitochondria combined with numerous nanotunnels may represent a signature
of mitochondrial OXPHOS deficiency or mitochondrial stress.
Figure 7.
Multivariate Analysis Mitochondrial Morphological Signatures among mtDNA
Disease and Healthy Controls
(A) Partial least-squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) on mtDNA
disease patients (n = 6) and healthy controls (n = 8) with 95% confidence
intervals (shaded areas). The 2-component model illustrated explains 46% of the
variance in the dataset and produces partial group separation.
(B) Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores illustrating the
contribution of different morphological features to the separation of healthy
controls and patients in the PLS-DA model. Parameters with scores above 1 (red
dotted line) are considered significant. Morphological features with higher
values in mitochondrial disease are in green, those higher in healthy controls
are in blue. Support vector machine (SVM) yielded similar results (not
shown).
(C) Bi-variate plot of the top two parameters, nanotunnels per 100
mitochondria and the proportion of simple mitochondria. Collectively, in this
limited sample, this combination of measures represents a signature sufficient
to accurately distinguish healthy controls (blue) and patients with mtDNA
disease (green).
DISCUSSION
The morphology of mitochondria is intrinsically linked to their function,
with numerous studies finding correlations between metabolic perturbations,
mitochondrial morphology, mitochondrial function, and tissue functions in model
organisms (Gomes et al., 2011; Hara et al., 2014; Leduc-Gaudet et al., 2015; Picard et al., 2014; Trushina et al., 2012). Here we developed threedimensional shape metric,
the MCI, and validated it against known differences between skeletal muscle SS and
IMF mitochondria. Using a combination of imaging and computational methods, we have
provided quantitative three-dimensional analysis of human mitochondria and
established differences in muscle mitochondrial morphology between human and mouse
and between healthy controls and patients with primary mtDNA disease.Previous three-dimensional reconstruction of human skeletal muscle
mitochondria had been limited to one study using focused ion beam (FIB)-SEM in
healthy individuals (Dahl et al., 2015),
which did not quantify individual mitochondria. Another study using FIB-SEM also
provided an assessment of mouse skeletal muscle mitochondrial morphology suggesting
the existence of a highly connected mitochondrial reticulum (Glancy et al., 2015). Our analyses extend these findings
in several ways.Quantitative assessment of individual mitochondrial morphology in healthy
human muscle fibers demonstrated an unexpectedly large degree of variability within
each cell, between cells of the same individual, and between individuals. As
expected, given that muscle fiber types with different oxidative capacity exhibit
different mitochondrial morphology and dynamics (Dahl et al., 2015; Mishra et al.,
2015), the variation in MCI between muscle fibers and between individuals
was substantial. It is not currently possible to assess muscle fiber types on
electron microscopy samples. Here, muscle fibers were selected based on high
mitochondrial mass, so the analyses likely include a mixture of different oxidative
fiber types. In patients with mitochondrial disease, cell-to-cell heterogeneity
could be further enhanced by the heterogenous distribution of mtDNA mutation load
presenting as a mosaic pattern of affected (OXPHOS-deficient) and unaffected
(OXPHOS-normal) fibers (Rocha et al., 2015).
Using the present technique, the correlation with single-cell heteroplasmy,
respiratory chain function, and fiber type is not possible and remains a challenge
for future studies to address. Nevertheless, even in analyses of single muscle
fibers, IMF mitochondrial volume, complexity, and branching showed high
heterogeneity—with simple and complex, and small and large mitochondria
coexisting within the same cells. It is noteworthy that moderate mtDNA heteroplasmy
in mitochondrial disease was associated with greater heterogeneity, as expected from
having some mitochondria with mutant mtDNA and some with wild-type (i.e., normal)
mtDNA. Together, these data document the natural heterogeneity of the human
mitochondrial network, which by itself may represent a relevant outcome measure and
may have functional implications in health and disease.When comparing mouse and human muscle fibers, our data show that species
differences are more pronounced for volume than for morphological complexity.
Mitochondria in mice tend to be columnar, extending in the longitudinal orientation,
with frequent small transverse protrusions similar to that reported previously
(Glancy et al., 2015). Glancy et al. (2015) reported the mitochondrial network
in oxidative mouse muscle fibers to constitute an almost completely continuous
reticulum. In contrast, our analyses in mouse muscle reveal numerous distinct
mitochondria are tightly packed into columns between myofibrils. These mitochondria
frequently have immediately adjacent outer mitochondrial membranes and
inter-mitochondrial junctions (IMJs) (Picard et al.,
2015b). When visualized with sufficient resolution, these juxtaposed
mitochondria are physically distinct organelles with separate matrix spaces (see
Figure S1). Molecular
information is certainly transferred between mitochondria under specific cellular
states (Glancy et al., 2017; Kurz et al., 2010; Picard
et al., 2015b). Nevertheless, rather than establishing continuity by
proximity, in an effort to map the morphology of individual mitochondria, here we
established segmentation criteria where each mitochondrion is defined as having a
continuous outer membrane. The current approach reflects the anatomy and nature of
individual mitochondria as ultimately determined by processes of fusion and fission.
Moreover, immediately adjacent mitochondria can exhibit localized and isolated
depolarization and “flash” events (Hou
et al., 2014), establishing individual adjacent mitochondria as
functional units under normal conditions. Thus, future morphology studies aiming to
understand the reshaping of mitochondria under conditions of stress and disease
should aim to combine both assessments of physical proximity and communication
(Glancy et al., 2017; Picard et al., 2015b), and importantly, to develop
quantitative morphological maps of mitochondrial networks involving the segmentation
of individual mitochondria. A paper using a similar approach was published while the
present article was under review (Bleck etal.,
2018).An unresolved question in mitochondrial biology is the relation between
respiratory chain dysfunction, mitochondrial elongation, and fragmentation. Based on
in vitro studies, the mitochondrial network has been demonstrated to undergo
stress-induced mitochondrial fusion in response to low levels of stress or
mutational heteroplasmy (Leduc-Gaudet et al.,
2015; Picard et al., 2014; Shutt and McBride, 2013; Tondera et al., 2009). However, when mutational
heteroplasmy is increased or stress exceeds some functional threshold, the
mitochondrial network undergoes fragmentation. Metabolic challenge, such as
starvation, induces a similar initial pro-fusion response, followed by fragmentation
(Gomes et al., 2011; Rambold et al., 2011). Our data in the m.8344A>G
tRNALys trio lends some support for the validity of this model
in vivo. Both the mother and her affected daughter with 60% and
97% mutation load, respectively, have fragmented mitochondrial networks. In
comparison, the sister with 40% heteroplasmy of the same mutation in fact shows the
highest mitochondrial network connectivity and number of nanotunnels of all studied
individuals, including controls, consistent with a compensatory hyperfusion response
to low levels of stress.The current study also demonstrates that the mitochondrial network is
anisotropic. Mitochondrial branching in humans is approximately four times more
extensive across the transverse z-band than longitudinally. Not only does this
reinforce the notion that three-dimensional assessments of mitochondrial morphology
are more accurate than two-dimensional ones in muscle samples, but it also has
implications for how mtDNA defects spread through muscle fibers. It has long been
recognized that mitochondrial dysfunction is segmental along muscle fibers (Bua et al., 2006; Elson et al., 2002; Matsuoka et al., 1992) and expands over time (Lopez et al., 2000). However, an understanding of how the
spread of mtDNA molecules is spatially constrained has remained elusive because it
is not currently possible to track this process in real time. If mtDNA defects
spread more rapidly along continuous mitochondrial tubules (i.e., the path of least
resistance), our results demonstrating the anisotropic nature of the mitochondrial
network—with four time more branching transversely than
longitudinally—would predict that mitochondrial dysfunction (mtDNA mutations
and respiratory chain deficiency) is likely to propagate more rapidly in the
transverse orientation, rather than longitudinally. Both this finding and the recent
identification of early segments of respiratory chain deficiency that are shorter
longitudinally than the diameter of the muscle fiber (Vincent et al., 2018) converge to suggest that human
skeletal muscle mtDNA mutations preferentially spread after following the natural
connectivity of the mitochondrial network. However, given the lack of kinetic and
experimental data, these observations should be interpreted with caution. In mice,
which exhibit more longitudinal columnar mitochondria and a different and more
extensive connectivity pattern than human mitochondria, the distribution of mtDNA
defects and their propagation in disease could follow different kinetics and be
driven by different mechanisms.In an effort to identify predictive patterns in our data that would
distinguish healthy individuals from those with mtDNA defects, we used an
integrative machine learning approach. Contrary to conventional statistical tests
that draw inference about a given sample, machine learning classifiers identify
generalizable predictive patterns from the data (Bzdok et al., 2018). These approaches are data driven (i.e., do not
require prior knowledge about which measures are more important) and handle datasets
that have a large number of variables relative to the sample size (Pedro, 2012), such as in this study. We integrated 3D EM
data in multivariate classifiers and discovered that a high prevalence of simple
mitochondria and a high nanotunnel density may be discriminant morphological
features of mitochondrial diseasepatients. It could be that these morphological
features are specific to mitochondrial disease, or instead that they represent more
generic morphological changes to energetic stress. A systematic comparison with
non-mitochondrial neuromuscular disorders would be necessary to establish to what
extent this signature is both sensitive and specific to mtDNA mutations.Nanotunnels are bacteria-like thin double OMM-IMM membrane connections
between mitochondria, capable of transporting proteins between physically
constrained mitochondria (Vincent et al.,
2017). Although the link between mtDNA mutations and increased
mitochondrial nanotunelling is unclear, similar to compensatory hyperfusion as an
initial stress response, we speculate that nanotunnels arise from mitochondria under
stress that “reach out for help.” In this scenario, mitochondrial
nanotunnels would enable functional complementation through the diffusion of
proteins, ions, transcripts, and possibly membrane potential between physically
constrained mitochondria that are not close enough to undergo fusion. Many questions
remain unanswered around mitochondrial nanotunnels including whether their lumen is
wide enough to transport mtDNA packaged as a proteinaceous nucleoids. Our
three-dimensional measurements indicate that only a small fraction (4.1%) of
nanotunnels would be wide enough to accommodate mtDNA nucleoids (based on bovine
cryo-EM measurements). Yet, their diffusion or transport would likely require
additional space to enable motility and directional motion within the nanotunnels.
This remains an unresolved point in need of further investigation.In conclusion, this work presents a quantitative EM resolution
three-dimensional assessment of mitochondrial morphology and network organization in
human skeletal muscle. This study also identifies morphological features that
distinguish human from mouse skeletal muscle mitochondria, and healthy individuals
from patients with mtDNA mutations, including an elevated frequency of simple
mitochondria and mitochondrial nanotunnels in mitochondrial disease. The existence
of mitochondrial nanotunnels suggests a possible mechanism for mitochondrial
communication in human tissues, and a possible disease marker. Quantitatively
defining the 3D morphological and anisotropic characteristics of mitochondrial
networks in different human tissues should yield further insights into the mechanism
underlying the origin and propagation of mitochondrial dysfunction in aging and
disease.
STAR★METHODS
CONTACT FOR REAGENT AND RESOURCE SHARING
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be
directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Martin Picard
(martin.picard@columbia.edu).
EXPERIMENTAL MODELS AND SUBJECT DETAILS
Human subjects and patients
This study was approved by the Newcastle and North Tyneside Local
Research Ethics Committees (reference 2002/205) and prior informed consent
was obtained from each participant. All experiments were carried out in
accordance with the approved guidelines. Biopsies were obtained from six
patients with genetically-confirmed mtDNA disease; two patients with single,
large mtDNA deletions, three patients with the m.8344A>G mutation and
one with the m.3243A>G mutation (Table S1). In all cases, muscle
biopsies were obtained from the tibialis anterior muscle. A further eight
control biopsies from the distal part of the hamstring were collected from
adults undergoing anterior cruciate ligament surgery (Table S2). For both patients
and controls a section of the biopsy specimen was processed for EM,
including gentle teasing of small muscle fiber bundles to insure rapid
fixation.
Mouse muscle samples
All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the UK Home
Office (PPL 60/4455) and the Newcastle University Animal Welfare Ethical
Review Board. Six male PV-Cre Knockin mice on c57bl/6N background (Jackson
lab 008069) aged 5 (n = 2) and 7 (n = 4) months were used for experiments.
Pairs of age-matched mice were processed in parallel, one underwent
transcardial perfusion and one had a lethal injection of 200 μl of
euthatal at 20 mg/mL containing sodium pentobarbital. The transcardially
perfused mice were perfused with 50 mL of EM fixative (2% glutaraldehyde in
0.1M cacodylate buffer), during fixation the hind limb was attached to a
spatula at a right angle preventing unwanted muscle contraction. All mice
were dissected and the right tibialis anterior muscle carefully removed. The
muscle was dissected further to remove a small region, the muscle fiber
bundles teased apart and immersed into fixative.
METHOD DETAILS
Transmission electron microscopy
For all samples, muscle fiber bundles fixed overnight in 2%
glutaradehyde (in cacodylate buffer (0.1M, pH7.4)) at 4°C. Fibers
were post fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 hour. Samples were dehydrated
in a graded series of acetone (25%, 30 min; 50%, 30 min; 75%, 30 min;
2×100%, 1 hour each) before being impregnated with increasing
concentrations of epoxy resin (TAAB medium grade; 25%, 50%, 75% in acetone,
3×100%, all for 1 hour each). They were then embedded in fresh resin
and polymerized at 60°C for 24-36 hours. Sections were cut on an
ultramicrotome, first semi-thin sections (0.5um) were stained with toluidine
blue for LM to identify the area of interest/confirm orientation of tissue.
Ultrathin sections (70nm) were then cut and picked up onto copper grids.
Sections were stained with 1% uranyl acetate (30 min) and 3% lead citrate (7
min) on a Leica EM AC20 automatic staining machine before being viewed on
the TEM (Philips CM100). Images were captured using a CCD camera (AMT40,
Deben UK). Scanning for regions of interest ×5800 and initial images
were captured at ×7900, more detailed images were captured at
×13500. Muscle fibers selected for analysis exhibited no more than
two Z-lines separated by a minimum of 10-15 μm, ensuring optimal
transverse orientation.
Serial block face scanning electron microscopy
Tissue was fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate buffer. It
was then processed using a heavy metal protocol adapted from (Wilke et al., 2013). Tissue was
immersed in 3% potassium ferrocyanide + 2% osmium tetroxide (1 hour at
4°C), followed by filtered 0.1% thiocarbohydrazide (20 min), then 2%
osmium tetroxide (30 min) and finally left overnight in 1% uranyl acetate at
4°C (with several water washes between each step). The next day the
samples were immersed in 0.6% lead aspartate solution (30 min at 60°C
and then dehydrated in graded acetone (as for TEM), impregnated with epoxy
Taab 812 hard resin, embedded in fresh resin and polymerized at 60°C
for 36-48 hours. After polymerization the block was sectioned for TEM to
identify the area of interest then trimmed to approximately 0.75 mm by 0.5
mm and glued onto an aluminum pin. In order to reduce sample charging within
the SEM, the block was painted with silver glue and sputter-coated with a 5
nm layer of gold. The pin was placed into a Zeiss Sigma SEM incorporating
the Gatan 3view system for serial block face (SBF)-SEM, which allows
sectioning of the block and the collection of serial images in the
z-direction.Using Digital Micrograph software, multiple regions of interest were
selected and imaged at ×8235 magnification, 1024×1024 pixel
scan, which gave a pixel resolution of approximately 10nm. Section thickness
was 30nm in the z-direction and at least 400 sections were collected,
yielding a total imaging depth of 12um. Before SBF-SEM, fibers with a high
mitochondrial content were selected via TEM and a z stack then captured. For
each human and mouse sample, four cells were imaged including threw for the
IMF compartment, and one for the SS/perinuclear compartment.
3D reconstructions
Image stacks from the SBF-SEM were converted to MRC files and 25 to
50 mitochondria reconstructed for each fiber using 3D-MOD (IMOD image
analysis software, (IMOD 4.7, Boulder Laboratory for 3-D Electron Microscopy
of Cells). Starting from the center of the stack to avoid mitochondria that
would be interrupted at the edges of the images volume, randomly selected
mitochondria were manually traced using the ‘sculpt’ drawing
tool on each section. The OMM of each mitochondrion was followed in all
three dimensions. Mitochondria with immediately adjacent OMM were segmented
separately, and membrane continuity was established based on continuous
planar electron density. A mesh and cap was then applied to fully segmented
organelles using flat criteria value of 1.5 and all other parameters set as
default, which enabled generation of closed volumes for surfaces lying
between two 30nm slices in the Z plane. For each completely reconstructed
mitochondrion, the total mesh surface area and total contour volume were
extracted and used in analyses. SS mitochondria included in quantitative
analyses were situated between myofibrils and the sarcolemma, often but not
always in proximity to a nucleus, and did not protrude into the IMF space.
To quantitatively distinguish between the two populations, SS mitochondria
with IMF protrusions, as shown in Video S2, were not included in
the analyses.
QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Quantifying mitochondrial complexity
Mitochondrial complexity index (MCI) was calculated using the
formula: where SA is surface area and V is volumeThis equation was derived from form factor (Koopman et al., 2005) and is a three-dimensional
equivalent, used to assess mitochondrial morphological complexity. The
fractional power is necessary to make the overall expression dimensionless
(area dimensions of L2 has dimensions of L3), and thus
independent of overall size of the object.We tested this formula and confirmed that MCI is a measure of
mitochondrial complexity invariant to volume (Figure S2). However, the
scaling of MCI did not accurately represent the perceived increase in
complexity. Changing the overall power of the complete expression has the
effect of expanding the dynamic range of the measure without changing its
dimensionality, and we investigated the effect of squaring and cubing the
total formula. It was observed that squaring the measure gave the most
accurate representation of mitochondrial complexity. As such the final
formula employed wasEquations (1) and
(2) contain the same
information, but Equation (2)
has a more natural mapping to perceived morphological difference.MCI was compared to sphericity, another measure of three-dimensional
shape that varies between 0 and 1, which asymptotically approaches 1 for a
perfect sphere. MCI was selected over sphericity due to the theoretically
unlimited complexity of mitochondrial morphology, which can scale up without
an upper boundary as morphological complexity increases from sequential
fusion events or increasing numbers of nanotunnels.
Quantifying mitochondrial branching
To assess mitochondrial branching and anisotropy, branching was
quantified in the context of the surrounding tissue in the transverse and
longitudinal planes and a ratio calculated. For transverse branching index
the number of myofibrils bridged was counted and 1 added. The number of
myofibrils bridged was calculated by adding together all branches that added
to the distance covered in the transverse plane. If a branch curved or if
the number of myofibrils was greater on one side than the other, the
greatest value was taken (Figure S3A). For longitudinal branching the number of sarcomeres
(+2), half sarcomeres (+1) and z-bands (+1) was summed and 1 added. Again
only branches that added to the overall longitudinal distance were included
(Figure S3B).
The transverse branching score was divided by the longitudinal branching
score, to yield a mitochondrial branching index (MBI). Mitochondrial were
classified into 3 groups based on MBI; > 1 more branched in
transverse orientation, 1 equally branched in both orientations and <
1 more branched longitudinally. Branching quantification was validated by
comparison of assessments by two investigators, which yielded similar
proportions of mitochondria established to be either more or equally
branched in transverse and longitudinal orientations (Figure S3C-E). The inter-rater
agreement in absolute MBI values was moderate (Figure S3C-E).
Nanotunnel measurements
For the purpose of mitochondrial nanotunnel measurements, previously
identified mitochondria with nanotunnels were manually reconstructed in
Microscopy Image Browser (Belevich et al.,
2016) and exported as Amira mesh files for measurements analysis
(Cocks et al., 2018). The total
number of nanotunnels for which measurements were taken was 362, some
nanotunnels were excluded from this analysis based morphology which was
difficult to measure in Amira. The .mrc image stacks and Amira mesh models
were opened in Amira to derive precise measurements of nanotunnel length, as
well as minimum and maximum diameter along the length each nanotunnel.
Multivariate analysis and machine learning
We calculated summary statistics to describe the observed
distributions of mitochondrial volume, complexity (MCI), and number of
nanotunnels in cells from muscle biopsies of humanpatients, human controls
and wild-type mice. Summary statistics included the percentage of
mitochondria whose volume and MCI were in the 10th percentile
(bottom 10% of the distribution) or in the 90th percentile (top
10%) of the combined control population (percent large, complex, percent
small, and simple, respectively) as well as the number of nanotunnels per
100 mitochondria and mitochondrial volume density. Partial least-squares
discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed using the mixOmics (6.3.1)
(Lê Cao et al., 2009;
Rohart et al., 2017) R (3.4.3)
(Team, 2017) package (code
available: https://gist.github.com/CnrLwlss/e4b0b2a2c4290ae4ad4eb9a4373680f3).
Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were extracted for each
mitochondrial feature from PLS-DA models.
Statistical analyses
Data on volume and MCI were fit using a linear mixed model with
organism and cell (nested within organism) as random effects and
species/disease status as fixed effects. Because of the extent of the
skewness of the data, measurements were log-transformed before analysis. For
all other statistics, normalization was not effective and therefore
non-parametric Mann-Whitney tests were used. For branching analyses a chi
square test was used to determine the significance for the percentages of
mitochondria classified in each group.
DATA AND SOFTWARE AVAILABILITY
Image stacks and model files are available from the authors upon
request.
Authors: Martin Picard; Ilan Azuelos; Boris Jung; Christian Giordano; Stefan Matecki; Sabah Hussain; Kathryn White; Tong Li; Feng Liang; Andrea Benedetti; Benoit J Gentil; Yan Burelle; Basil J Petrof Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-03-12
Authors: Yuko Hara; Frank Yuk; Rishi Puri; William G M Janssen; Peter R Rapp; John H Morrison Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mariana C Rocha; John P Grady; Anne Grünewald; Amy Vincent; Philip F Dobson; Robert W Taylor; Doug M Turnbull; Karolina A Rygiel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Werner J H Koopman; Leo G J Nijtmans; Cindy E J Dieteren; Peggy Roestenberg; Federica Valsecchi; Jan A M Smeitink; Peter H G M Willems Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Georgia Campbell; Kim J Krishnan; Marcus Deschauer; Robert W Taylor; Doug M Turnbull Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Amy E Vincent; Hannah S Rosa; Kamil Pabis; Conor Lawless; Chun Chen; Anne Grünewald; Karolina A Rygiel; Mariana C Rocha; Amy K Reeve; Gavin Falkous; Valentina Perissi; Kathryn White; Tracey Davey; Basil J Petrof; Avan A Sayer; Cyrus Cooper; David Deehan; Robert W Taylor; Doug M Turnbull; Martin Picard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Alyssa D Brown; Matthew J Fogarty; Leah A Davis; Debanjali Dasgupta; Carlos B Mantilla; Gary C Sieck Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2022-06-09
Authors: Débora da Luz Scheffer; Adriana Ann Garcia; Lucia Lee; Daria Mochly-Rosen; Julio Cesar Batista Ferreira Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2022-04-18 Impact factor: 7.468
Authors: Kyle Thompson; Jack J Collier; Ruth I C Glasgow; Fiona M Robertson; Angela Pyle; Emma L Blakely; Charlotte L Alston; Monika Oláhová; Robert McFarland; Robert W Taylor Journal: J Inherit Metab Dis Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 4.750