Enrico Calderani1, Lisa Giardinelli2, Silvia Scannerini2, Susanna Arcabasso2, Elisa Compagno2, Felice Petraglia3, Valdo Ricca4. 1. Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Psychiatry Unit, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: enrico.calderani@gmail.com. 2. Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Psychiatry Unit, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy. 3. Department of Biomedical Experimental and Clinical Sciences, University of Florence, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Careggi University Hospital, Viale Morgagni 50, Florence, Italy. 4. Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Psychiatry Unit, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Italy. Electronic address: valdo.ricca@unifi.it.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Diagnosis of tocophobia using existing instruments is an area of active investigation. Although a range of Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) cut-off scores has been suggested for detecting tocophobia, there is no consensus among researchers about an optimal cut-off score. The primary goal of the present study was to identify a cut-off value while referring to the DSM-5 Specific Phobia criteria as a gold standard, and to accordingly evaluate how the fearful component of the childbirth experience and psychopathology in the post-natal period are affected by tocophobia. METHODS: We conducted an observational, longitudinal study on nulliparous women (n = 106). Routine pregnancy data and data from psychometric questionnaires investigating depression, anxiety, and fear of childbirth were collected. A psychiatric Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) was also conducted. The same parameters were re-evaluated one month after parturition. RESULTS: A W-DEQ score of 85 was found to be the optimal cut-off score for detecting tocophobia, with sound sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93.8%). We found substantial agreement between the W-DEQ A and SCID-5 Specific Phobia Criteria (Cohen's Kappa coefficient, κ = 0.720). CONCLUSIONS: A W-DEQ cut-off value of 85 is a reliable tool for detecting clinically relevant fear of childbirth according to the DSM-5 diagnosis of Specific Phobia. Therefore, accurate psychopathological investigation must be administered to women with W-DEQ scores greater than this cut-off score.
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Diagnosis of tocophobia using existing instruments is an area of active investigation. Although a range of Wijma Delivery Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) cut-off scores has been suggested for detecting tocophobia, there is no consensus among researchers about an optimal cut-off score. The primary goal of the present study was to identify a cut-off value while referring to the DSM-5 Specific Phobia criteria as a gold standard, and to accordingly evaluate how the fearful component of the childbirth experience and psychopathology in the post-natal period are affected by tocophobia. METHODS: We conducted an observational, longitudinal study on nulliparous women (n = 106). Routine pregnancy data and data from psychometric questionnaires investigating depression, anxiety, and fear of childbirth were collected. A psychiatric Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID-5) was also conducted. The same parameters were re-evaluated one month after parturition. RESULTS: A W-DEQ score of 85 was found to be the optimal cut-off score for detecting tocophobia, with sound sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93.8%). We found substantial agreement between the W-DEQ A and SCID-5 Specific Phobia Criteria (Cohen's Kappa coefficient, κ = 0.720). CONCLUSIONS: A W-DEQ cut-off value of 85 is a reliable tool for detecting clinically relevant fear of childbirth according to the DSM-5 diagnosis of Specific Phobia. Therefore, accurate psychopathological investigation must be administered to women with W-DEQ scores greater than this cut-off score.
Authors: Nichole Fairbrother; Arianne Albert; Fanie Collardeau; Cora Keeney Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Fiona L Challacombe; Selina Nath; Kylee Trevillion; Susan Pawlby; Louise M Howard Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2020-12-17 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: M A M Baas; M G van Pampus; C A I Stramrood; L M Dijksman; J W Vanhommerig; A de Jongh Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Nichole Fairbrother; Fanie Collardeau; Arianne Albert; Kathrin Stoll Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Renata Tambelli; Giulia Ballarotto; Carmen Trumello; Alessandra Babore Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-10-07 Impact factor: 4.614