| Literature DB >> 30654973 |
Philip J H Dunn1, Sarah Hill2, Simon Cowen2, Heidi Goenaga-Infante2, Mike Sargent2, Ahmet Ceyhan Gören3, Mine Bilsel3, Adnan Şimşek3, Nives Ogrinc4, Doris Potočnik4, Paul Armishaw5, Lu Hai6, Leonid Konopelko7, Yan Chubchenko7, Lesley A Chesson8, Gerard van der Peijl9, Cornelia Blaga9, Robert Posey10, Federica Camin11, Anatoly Chernyshev12, Sadia A Chowdhury13.
Abstract
Forensic application of carbon isotope ratio measurements of honey and honey protein to investigate the degree of adulteration with high fructose corn syrup or other C4 plant sugars is well established. These measurements must use methods that exhibit suitable performance criteria, particularly with regard to measurement uncertainty and traceability - low levels of adulteration can only be detected by methods that result in suitably small measurement uncertainties such that differences of 1‰ or less can be reliably detected. Inter-laboratory exercises are invaluable to assess the state-of-the art of measurement capabilities of laboratories necessary to achieve such performance criteria. National and designated metrology institutes from a number of countries recently participated in an inter-laboratory assessment (CCQM-K140) of stable carbon isotope ratio determination of bulk honey. The same sample material was distributed to a number of forensic isotope analysis laboratories that could not participate directly in the metrological comparison. The results from these studies have demonstrated that the majority of participants provided isotope delta values with acceptable performance metrics; that all participants ensured traceability of their results; and that where measurement uncertainties were reported; these were fit-for-purpose. A number of the forensic laboratories only reported precision rather than full estimates of measurement uncertainty and this was the major cause of the few instances of questionable performance metrics. Reporting of standard deviations in place of measurement uncertainties is common practice outside metrology institutes and the implications for interpretations of small differences in isotopic compositions are discussed. The results have also highlighted a number of considerations that are useful for organisers of similar inter-laboratory studies in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Inter-laboratory comparison; Isotope ratio; Metrology; Performance metrics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30654973 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Justice ISSN: 1355-0306 Impact factor: 2.124