| Literature DB >> 30654832 |
Yuanyuan Feng1, Xiaoqing Gong2, Kexin Zhu2, Na Li2, Zhengjie Yu2, Yaqiong Guo2, Yabiao Weng2, Martin Kváč3, Yaoyu Feng4,5, Lihua Xiao6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi are common enteric pathogens in humans and animals. Data on the transmission of these pathogens are scarce from Guangdong, China, which has a subtropical monsoon climate and is the epicenter for many emerging infectious diseases. This study was conducted to better understand the prevalence and identity of the three pathogens in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong.Entities:
Keywords: Cryptosporidium; Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Giardia duodenalis; Molecular epidemiology
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30654832 PMCID: PMC6337774 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3310-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Detection rates and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong by sampling date
| Sampling date | Sample size | Detection rate of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First (spring) | 108 | 31.5/64.8/38.0 | 28 | 1 | 5 | IIdA19G1 (4) | E (65), A+E (4), A (1) | J (40), J + D (1) |
| Second (summer) | 111 | 17.1/55.8/7.2 | 12 | 2 | 5 | IIdA19G1 (5) | E (62) | J (8) |
| Third (winter) | 169 | 23.1/92.3/7.1 | 33 | 4 | 2 | IIdA19G1 (1) | E (155), A+E (1) | J (9), D (3) |
| Total | 388 | 24.0/74.2/15.7 | 73 | 7 | 12 | IIdA19G1 (10) | E (282), A+E (5), A (1) | J (57), D (3), J + D (1) |
Detection rates and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis and E. bieneusi in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong by age in weeks
| Animal age (week) | Sample size |
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detection rate (%) | Detection rate (%) | Assemblage ( | Detection rate (%) | Genotype ( | |||||
| 1 | 7 | 14.3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 14.3 | E (1) | 0 | – |
| 2 | 14 | 35.7 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 28.6 | E (4) | 0 | – |
| 3 | 18 | 22.2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 61.1 | E (11) | 11.1 | J (2) |
| 4 | 60 | 16.7 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 75.0 | E (45) | 10.0 | J (5), D (1) |
| 5 | 75 | 34.7 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 74.7 | E (54), A + E (1), A (1) | 17.3 | J (13) |
| 6 | 55 | 29.1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 78.2 | E (42), A + E (1) | 9.1 | J (2), D (2), J + D (1) |
| 7 | 49 | 16.3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 85.7 | E (42) | 16.3 | J (8) |
| 8 | 44 | 22.7 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 88.6 | E (38), A + E (1) | 20.5 | J (9) |
| 9 | 33 | 12.1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 84.8 | E (28) | 24.2 | J (8) |
| Unknown | 33 | 27.3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 57.6 | E (17), A + E (2) | 30.3 | J (10) |
| Total | 388 | 24.0 | 73 | 12 | 7 | 74.2 | E (282), A + E (5), A (1) | 15.7 | J (57), D (3), J + D (1) |
Detection rates and genotypes of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle in Guangdong by diarrhea status
| Animal group | Sample size | Detection rate of | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhea | 21 | 33.3/71.4/0.0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | E (15) | – |
| No diarrhea | 367 | 23.4/74.4/16.6 | 68 | 7 | 10 | E (267), A + E (5), A (1) | J (57), D (3), J + D (1) |
| Total | 388 | 24.0/74.2/15.7 | 73 | 7 | 12 | E (282), A + E (5), A (1) | J (57), D (3), J + D (1) |
Multilocus sequence genotypes of Giardia duodenalis in Guangdong, China by season, based on nucleotide sequence analysis of the beta -giardin (bg), triosephosphate isomerase (tpi) and glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) genes
| MLGsa | Subtype | No. positive | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Spring | Summer | Winter | |
| MLG-E1 | E3 | E17 | E1 | 4 | 17 | 25 |
| MLG-E2 | E3 | E17 | E3 | 5 | 3 | 13 |
| MLG-E3 | E3 | E37b | E1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MLG-E4 | E3 | E37b | E3 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| MLG-E5 | E3 | E34 | E1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| MLG-E6 | E3 | E34 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MLG-E7 | E5 | E17 | E1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| MLG-E8 | E5 | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E9 | E4 | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E10 | E8 | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E11 | E4 | E17 | E1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E12 | E9 | E17 | E1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MLG-E13 | E5 | E36b | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E14 | E18b | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E15 | E9 | E34 | E1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E16 | E9 | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E17 | E9 | E37b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E18 | E9 | E1 | E3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MLG-E19 | E9 | E37b | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E20 | E3 | E1 | E1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MLG-E21 | E5 | E36b | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E22 | E7 | E17 | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E23 | E3 | E17 | E29 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| MLG-E24 | E3 | E17 | E39b | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| MLG-E25 | E5 | E34 | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E26 | E8 | E35b | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E27 | E3 | E35b | E3 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| MLG-E28 | E8 | E35b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E29 | E8 | E37b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E30 | E4 | E37b | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E31 | E3 | E42b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MLG-E32 | E3 | E17 | E40b | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E33 | E3 | E17 | E41 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E34 | E4 | E1 | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E35 | E3 | E1 | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E36 | E8 | E1 | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E37 | E3 | E39b | E3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-E38 | E3 | E45b | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E39 | E8 | E42b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E40 | E8 | E41b | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E41 | E3 | E46b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E42 | E4 | E43b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E43 | E26b | E17 | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E44 | E3 | E43b | E3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E45 | E7 | E44b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E46 | E7 | E1 | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E47 | E7 | E37b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E48 | E3 | E45b | E1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MLG-E49 | E4 | E17 | E37 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| MLG-AI | A1 | A1 | A1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
aMLGs were named based on sequence types at the bg, tpi and gdh locus. No attempts were made to consolidate MLG names of assemblage E among studies because of the extensive genetic heterogeneity within the G. duodenalis genotype
bNovel subtype