| Literature DB >> 30654619 |
Muriel Sprynger1, Michel Willems2, Hendrik Van Damme1, Benny Drieghe3, J C Wautrecht4, Marie Moonen1.
Abstract
In Europe, the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in the elderly population (≥65 year old) has declined in the past decades to <4%. Aneurysmal degeneration of the aorta is a serious and potentially life-threatening vascular disease. Abdominal aortic aneurysms typically develop subclinically and often only become symptomatic when complicated by impending rupture. Most AAAs are discovered incidentally while investigating for an unrelated pathology. Ruptured AAA is the tenth leading cause of death in Belgium (0.32% of all deaths in 2014). Health-care providers have emphasized the importance of early detection of AAA and elective repair when the rupture risk outweighs operative risk (usual diameter threshold of 55 mm). Routine AAA screening programs, consisting of a single abdominal ultrasonography at the age of 65 years, aim to reduce the number of AAA-related deaths. Does population-based ultrasound screening for AAA achieve its objective and is it cost-effective? This literature review tries to answer these challenging questions.Entities:
Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm; cost-effectiveness; follow-up; preventive medicine; screening program; ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30654619 DOI: 10.1177/0003319718824940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angiology ISSN: 0003-3197 Impact factor: 3.619