Benjamin Voumard1, Ghislain Maquer1, Peter Heuberger2, Philippe K Zysset3, Uwe Wolfram4. 1. Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland. 2. Biomechanics Research, Nobel Biocare Services AG, Balsberg Balz Zimmermann-Strasse 7, 8302 Kloten, Switzerland. 3. Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: philippe.zysset@istb.unibe.ch. 4. Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, University of Bern, Stauffacherstrasse 78, 3014 Bern, Switzerland; Institute for Mechanical, Process and Energy Engineering, Heriot-Watt University, UK EH14 4AS, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dental implants are widely used to restore function and appearance. It may be essential to choose the appropriate drilling protocol and implant design in order to optimise primary stability. This could be achieved based on an assessment of the implantation site with respect to bone quality and objective biomechanical descriptors such as stiffness and strength of the bone-implant system. The aim of this ex vivo study is to relate these descriptors with bone quality, with a pre-implantation indicator of implant stability: pilot-hole drilling force (Fdrilling), and with two post-implantation indicators: maximal implantation torque (Timplantation) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). METHODS: Eighty trabecular bone specimens were cored from human vertebrae and bovine tibiae. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV), a representative for bone quality, was obtained through micro-computed tomography scans. Implants were kept in controlled laboratory conditions following standard surgical procedures. Forces and torques were recorded and RFA was assessed after implantation. Off-axis compression tests were conducted on the implants until failure. Implant stability was identified by stiffness and ultimate force (Fultimate). The relationships between BV/TV, Stiffness, Fultimate and Fdrilling, Timplantation, RFA were established. RESULTS: Fdrilling correlated well with BV/TV of the implantation site (r2 = 0.81), stiffness (r2 = 0.75) and Fultimate (r2 = 0.80). Timplantation correlated better with stiffness (r2 = 0.86) and Fultimate (r2 = 0.94) than RFA (r2 = 0.77 and r2 = 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that BV/TV and bone-implant stability can be directly estimated by the force needed for the pilot drilling that occurs during the site preparation before implantation. Moreover, implantation torque outperforms RFA for evaluating the mechanical competence of the bone-implant system.
OBJECTIVES: Dental implants are widely used to restore function and appearance. It may be essential to choose the appropriate drilling protocol and implant design in order to optimise primary stability. This could be achieved based on an assessment of the implantation site with respect to bone quality and objective biomechanical descriptors such as stiffness and strength of the bone-implant system. The aim of this ex vivo study is to relate these descriptors with bone quality, with a pre-implantation indicator of implant stability: pilot-hole drilling force (Fdrilling), and with two post-implantation indicators: maximal implantation torque (Timplantation) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). METHODS: Eighty trabecular bone specimens were cored from human vertebrae and bovine tibiae. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV), a representative for bone quality, was obtained through micro-computed tomography scans. Implants were kept in controlled laboratory conditions following standard surgical procedures. Forces and torques were recorded and RFA was assessed after implantation. Off-axis compression tests were conducted on the implants until failure. Implant stability was identified by stiffness and ultimate force (Fultimate). The relationships between BV/TV, Stiffness, Fultimate and Fdrilling, Timplantation, RFA were established. RESULTS: Fdrilling correlated well with BV/TV of the implantation site (r2 = 0.81), stiffness (r2 = 0.75) and Fultimate (r2 = 0.80). Timplantation correlated better with stiffness (r2 = 0.86) and Fultimate (r2 = 0.94) than RFA (r2 = 0.77 and r2 = 0.74, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that BV/TV and bone-implant stability can be directly estimated by the force needed for the pilot drilling that occurs during the site preparation before implantation. Moreover, implantation torque outperforms RFA for evaluating the mechanical competence of the bone-implant system.
Authors: Helena Francisco; Gary Finelle; Fabien Bornert; Rebecca Sandgren; Valentin Herber; Nils Warfving; Benjamin E Pippenger Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.573