Literature DB >> 30654154

Understanding attitudes and behaviors towards cell-free DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT): A survey of European health-care providers.

Alexandra Benachi1, Jessica Caffrey2, Pavel Calda3, Elena Carreras4, Jacques C Jani5, Mark D Kilby6, Hanns-Georg Klein7, Giuseppe Rizzo8, Yuval Yaron9.   

Abstract

Cell-free DNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (cfDNA) is a relatively new screening tool that analyzes cfDNA circulating in maternal plasma to screen for aneuploidies. Since its introduction, cfDNA has been rapidly adopted by health care providers (HCPs). This rapid adoption, as well as progressive developments in the technology, requires professional societies to continuously update their guidelines to indicate the broadening scope both in terms of test indications and patient populations for whom it has become the appropriate primary test. CfDNA testing, initially applied to high-risk patients, is now largely considered an option for all patients. For HCPs, the rapid introduction of cfDNA into clinical practice has come with the requirement to stay up-to-date and accurately informed. We performed a survey to understand the current practices and views of European HCPs on the use of cfDNA. European HCPs were surveyed on several topics such as familiarity with cfDNA-based noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT), current usage, patient counseling, test menu expansion, and future perspectives. The results of this survey demonstrate increasing usage and awareness of cfDNA-based NIPT in five European countries (UK, France, Germany, Spain and Italy). Major barriers to implementation include cost and a lack of physician education on NIPT.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell-free DNA; Europe; Health care provider; Noninvasive prenatal testing; Survey

Year:  2019        PMID: 30654154     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Med Genet        ISSN: 1769-7212            Impact factor:   2.708


  6 in total

1.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening Strategies Involving Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomy 21.

Authors:  Shuxian Wang; Kejun Liu; Huixia Yang; Jingmei Ma
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women's perspectives.

Authors:  Karuna R M van der Meij; Annabel Njio; Linda Martin; Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal; Mireille N Bekker; Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki; A Jeanine E M van der Ven; Adriana Kater-Kuipers; Danielle R M Timmermans; Erik A Sistermans; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 3.  Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues.

Authors:  Hilary Bowman-Smart; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Cara Mand; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Implementation challenges for an ethical introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' views from Lebanon and Quebec.

Authors:  Hazar Haidar; Meredith Vanstone; Anne-Marie Laberge; Gilles Bibeau; Labib Ghulmiyyah; Vardit Ravitsky
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Prenatal screening in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a Nationwide cross-sectional survey of obstetrician knowledge, attitudes and clinical practice.

Authors:  Liying Yang; Wei Ching Tan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Non-invasive prenatal test uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods.

Authors:  Karuna R M van der Meij; Caroline Kooij; Mireille N Bekker; Robert-Jan H Galjaard; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.242

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.