Anna Bjornson1, Ian Tapply2, Eva Nabbanja1, Afrodite-Despina Lalou3, Marek Czosnyka3, Zofia Czosnyka3, Brinda Muthusamy2, Matthew Garnett1. 1. a Department of Neurosurgery , Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK. 2. b Department of Ophthalmology , Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge , UK. 3. c Brain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrookes Hospital , Cambridge University , Cambridge , UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts as a treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) Materials and Methods: Retrospective case series of 28 patients with IIH and evidence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) who underwent shunt insertion. Patients were identified from a prospectively updated operative database. A case-notes review was performed and data on type of shunt, pre- and post-operative symptoms, ophthalmological findings and post-operative complications were recorded. RESULTS: All patients had symptoms of IIH that had failed medical management. Twelve patients had previous lumbo-peritoneal shunts and 2 patients had previous venous sinus stents. All patients had evidence of raised ICP as papilloedema and raised CSF pressure on lumbar puncture. Twenty-seven patients received a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt and 1 patient a ventriculo-atrial shunt. Twenty-six patients received Orbis Sigma Valves and 2 patients Strata valves. At follow-up all patients (100%) had improvement/resolution of papilloedema, 93% had improved visual acuity and 84% had improved headaches. Mean time to last follow-up was 15 (range 4-96) months. Complications occurred in 3 patients (11%): 2 patients required revision of their peritoneal catheters and 1 patient had an anti-siphon device inserted. CONCLUSIONS: Previous literature reported a ventricular shunt revision rate of 22-42% in the management of IIH. We demonstrate ventriculo-peritoneal shunts to be an effective treatment with a revision rate of 11% compared to the previously reported 22-42%.
PURPOSE: To determine the outcome of ventriculo-peritoneal shunts as a treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) Materials and Methods: Retrospective case series of 28 patients with IIH and evidence of raised intracranial pressure (ICP) who underwent shunt insertion. Patients were identified from a prospectively updated operative database. A case-notes review was performed and data on type of shunt, pre- and post-operative symptoms, ophthalmological findings and post-operative complications were recorded. RESULTS: All patients had symptoms of IIH that had failed medical management. Twelve patients had previous lumbo-peritoneal shunts and 2 patients had previous venous sinus stents. All patients had evidence of raised ICP as papilloedema and raised CSF pressure on lumbar puncture. Twenty-seven patients received a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt and 1 patient a ventriculo-atrial shunt. Twenty-six patients received Orbis Sigma Valves and 2 patients Strata valves. At follow-up all patients (100%) had improvement/resolution of papilloedema, 93% had improved visual acuity and 84% had improved headaches. Mean time to last follow-up was 15 (range 4-96) months. Complications occurred in 3 patients (11%): 2 patients required revision of their peritoneal catheters and 1 patient had an anti-siphon device inserted. CONCLUSIONS: Previous literature reported a ventricular shunt revision rate of 22-42% in the management of IIH. We demonstrate ventriculo-peritoneal shunts to be an effective treatment with a revision rate of 11% compared to the previously reported 22-42%.
Entities:
Keywords:
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension; Orbis sigma valve; Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt