Masahiro Tsutsumi1, Akimoto Nimura1, Keiichi Akita1. 1. Departments of Clinical Anatomy (M.T. and K.A.) and Functional Joint Anatomy (A.N.), Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gluteus medius tears are a common hip disorder. Despite this, the etiology of these tears and the anatomical background of the gluteus medius tendon remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of the gluteus medius tendon. We hypothesized that the tendinous portions of the gluteus medius have a nonuniform structure contributing to the tear etiology. METHODS: Twenty-five hips from 15 Japanese cadavers were analyzed. Twenty-one of the hips were analyzed macroscopically, and the other 4 were analyzed histologically. In all of the specimens, the 3-dimensional (3D) morphology of the greater trochanter was examined using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). In 10 of the 21 hips analyzed macroscopically, the local thickness of the gluteus medius tendon, detached from the greater trochanter, was measured. RESULTS: The posterior and anterolateral parts of the gluteus medius tendons were roughly distinguished on the basis of the aspects of the iliac origins. The posterior part of the gluteus medius tendon ran in a fan-like shape and converged onto the superoposterior facet of the greater trochanter. The anterolateral part ran posteroinferiorly toward the lateral facet of the greater trochanter. The thickness was greater in the posterior part than in the anterolateral part, and the border between these 2 parts was relatively thin compared with the other parts. The histological study showed that both the posterior and anterolateral parts inserted onto the greater trochanter via fibrocartilage. CONCLUSIONS: The gluteus medius tendon consists of thick posterior and thin anterolateral parts, which were identified by the facet or aspect of the bone structures and thinness of their border region. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings indicate that, given the nonuniform structure of the gluteus medius tendon, the thin anterolateral part may be more prone to tears than the thick posterior part is and tears may generally be limited to the anterolateral part.
BACKGROUND: Gluteus medius tears are a common hip disorder. Despite this, the etiology of these tears and the anatomical background of the gluteus medius tendon remain unclear. This study aimed to clarify the characteristics of the gluteus medius tendon. We hypothesized that the tendinous portions of the gluteus medius have a nonuniform structure contributing to the tear etiology. METHODS: Twenty-five hips from 15 Japanese cadavers were analyzed. Twenty-one of the hips were analyzed macroscopically, and the other 4 were analyzed histologically. In all of the specimens, the 3-dimensional (3D) morphology of the greater trochanter was examined using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). In 10 of the 21 hips analyzed macroscopically, the local thickness of the gluteus medius tendon, detached from the greater trochanter, was measured. RESULTS: The posterior and anterolateral parts of the gluteus medius tendons were roughly distinguished on the basis of the aspects of the iliac origins. The posterior part of the gluteus medius tendon ran in a fan-like shape and converged onto the superoposterior facet of the greater trochanter. The anterolateral part ran posteroinferiorly toward the lateral facet of the greater trochanter. The thickness was greater in the posterior part than in the anterolateral part, and the border between these 2 parts was relatively thin compared with the other parts. The histological study showed that both the posterior and anterolateral parts inserted onto the greater trochanter via fibrocartilage. CONCLUSIONS: The gluteus medius tendon consists of thick posterior and thin anterolateral parts, which were identified by the facet or aspect of the bone structures and thinness of their border region. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings indicate that, given the nonuniform structure of the gluteus medius tendon, the thin anterolateral part may be more prone to tears than the thick posterior part is and tears may generally be limited to the anterolateral part.
Authors: Alexander Maslaris; Thomas P Vail; Alan L Zhang; Rina Patel; Stefano A Bini Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 2.928