Literature DB >> 30652522

A scoping literature review of studies assessing effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Aoife Healy1, Sybil Farmer1, Nicola Eddison1,2, Jonathan Allcock1, Thomas Perry1, Anand Pandyan1,3, Nachiappan Chockalingam1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Approximately 1.5% of the world's population (∼100 million people) need a prosthesis/orthosis. The objective of the study was to establish an overview of the literature that has examined prosthetic and orthotic interventions with a view to inform policy development.
Methods: Fourteen databases were searched from 1995-2015. Studies reporting primary research on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions were examined. Metadata and information on study characteristics were extracted from the included studies.
Results: The searches resulted in a total of 28,958 articles, a focus on studies with the words "randomized" OR "randomized" OR "cost" OR "economic" in their citation reduced this total to 2644. Research has predominantly been conducted in Australia, Canada, Germany, Netherlands, UK and USA. A total of 346 randomized controlled trials were identified, with only four randomized controlled trials examining prosthetic interventions. The majority of research examined lower limb orthoses in the adult population and used a wide range of outcome measures.Conclusions: While various international organizations have highlighted the value of providing prosthetic and orthotic services, both to the user and society as a whole, the availability of scientific research to inform policy is limited. Future structured evaluation of prosthetic and orthotic interventions/services is warranted to inform future policy developments.Implications for rehabilitationResearch into prosthetic and orthotic interventions has grown substantially in the last 20 years, with most of this research conducted in a small number of countries and focusing on the use of lower limb orthotics in adult populations.Research to date has utilized an extensive range of outcome measures, the development of agreed standardized sets of outcomes would allow comparison and combination of results in future research.This study highlights the need for further research in this area, especially studies which examine the cost-effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic provision.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthotic device; amputation; artificial limb; cost-effectiveness; effectiveness; footwear; mobility; prosthetics

Year:  2019        PMID: 30652522     DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1523953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  3 in total

1.  Prioritizing solutions to incorporate Prosthetics and Orthotics services into Iranian health benefits package: Using an analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  Saeed Shahabi; Shahina Pardhan; Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy; Dimitrios Skempes; Shabnam Shahali; Parviz Mojgani; Maryam Jalali; Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.

Authors:  Nienke Kerver; Sacha van Twillert; Bart Maas; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Financing of physical rehabilitation services in Iran: a stakeholder and social network analysis.

Authors:  Saeed Shahabi; Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy; Hosein Shabaninejad; Mohammad Kamali; Kamran Bagheri Lankarani
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.