Literature DB >> 30649998

Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Models for Opting Out of Treatment.

Kathleen F Kerr1, Marshall D Brown2, Tracey L Marsh2, Holly Janes2.   

Abstract

Decision curves are a tool for evaluating the population impact of using a risk model for deciding whether to undergo some intervention, which might be a treatment to help prevent an unwanted clinical event or invasive diagnostic testing such as biopsy. The common formulation of decision curves is based on an opt-in framework. That is, a risk model is evaluated based on the population impact of using the model to opt high-risk patients into treatment in a setting where the standard of care is not to treat. Opt-in decision curves display the population net benefit of the risk model in comparison to the reference policy of treating no patients. In some contexts, however, the standard of care in the absence of a risk model is to treat everyone, and the potential use of the risk model would be to opt low-risk patients out of treatment. Although opt-out settings were discussed in the original decision curve paper, opt-out decision curves are underused. We review the formulation of opt-out decision curves and discuss their advantages for interpretation and inference when treat-all is the standard.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision curve; net benefit; relative utility; risk prediction; risk-based decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30649998      PMCID: PMC6374190          DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18819479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  13 in total

1.  The irrelevance of inference: a decision-making approach to the stochastic evaluation of health care technologies.

Authors:  K Claxton
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Putting risk prediction in perspective: relative utility curves.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Assessing the Clinical Impact of Risk Prediction Models With Decision Curves: Guidance for Correct Interpretation and Appropriate Use.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Marshall D Brown; Kehao Zhu; Holly Janes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Urinary cell mRNA profiles and differential diagnosis of acute kidney graft dysfunction.

Authors:  Marie Matignon; Ruchuang Ding; Darshana M Dadhania; Franco B Mueller; Choli Hartono; Catherine Snopkowski; Carol Li; John R Lee; Daniel Sjoberg; Surya V Seshan; Vijay K Sharma; Hua Yang; Bakr Nour; Andrew J Vickers; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Thangamani Muthukumar
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Novel prediction score including pre- and intraoperative parameters best predicts acute kidney injury after liver surgery.

Authors:  Ksenija Slankamenac; Beatrice Beck-Schimmer; Stefan Breitenstein; Milo A Puhan; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker; Nancy R Cook; Andrew Vickers; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 8.  Reporting and Interpreting Decision Curve Analysis: A Guide for Investigators.

Authors:  Ben Van Calster; Laure Wynants; Jan F M Verbeek; Jan Y Verbakel; Evangelia Christodoulou; Andrew J Vickers; Monique J Roobol; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-25
View more
  8 in total

1.  The Importance of Uncertainty and Opt-In v. Opt-Out: Best Practices for Decision Curve Analysis.

Authors:  Kathleen F Kerr; Tracey L Marsh; Holly Janes
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Metrics for Evaluating Polygenic Risk Scores.

Authors:  Stuart G Baker
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-12-23

3.  A predictive nomogram for mortality of cancer patients with invasive candidiasis: a 10-year study in a cancer center of North China.

Authors:  Ding Li; Tianjiao Li; Changsen Bai; Qing Zhang; Zheng Li; Xichuan Li
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Broad external validation of a multivariable risk prediction model for gastrointestinal malignancy in iron deficiency anaemia.

Authors:  Orouba Almilaji; Gwilym Webb; Alec Maynard; Thomas P Chapman; Brian S F Shine; Antony J Ellis; John Hebden; Sharon Docherty; Elizabeth J Williams; Jonathon Snook
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  Development and Validation of the Acute PNeumonia Early Assessment Score for Safely Discharging Low-Risk SARS-CoV-2-Infected Patients from the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Sergio Venturini; Elisa Pontoni; Rossella Carnelos; Domenico Arcidiacono; Silvia Da Ros; Laura De Santi; Daniele Orso; Francesco Cugini; Sara Fossati; Astrid Callegari; Walter Mancini; Maurizio Tonizzo; Alessandro Grembiale; Massimo Crapis; GianLuca Colussi
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Noninvasive biomarkers for lung cancer diagnosis, where do we stand?

Authors:  Michael N Kammer; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.005

7.  Predicting Residual Function in Hemodialysis and Hemodiafiltration-A Population Kinetic, Decision Analytic Approach.

Authors:  Muhammad I Achakzai; Christos Argyropoulos; Maria-Eleni Roumelioti
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Recalibration Methods for Improved Clinical Utility of Risk Scores.

Authors:  Anu Mishra; Robyn L McClelland; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Kathleen F Kerr
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 2.749

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.