Max-Heinrich Laves1, Jens Bicker2, Lüder A Kahrs2, Tobias Ortmaier2. 1. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstraße 11A, 30167, Hannover, Germany. laves@imes.uni-hannover.de. 2. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Appelstraße 11A, 30167, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Automated segmentation of anatomical structures in medical image analysis is a prerequisite for autonomous diagnosis as well as various computer- and robot-aided interventions. Recent methods based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed former heuristic methods. However, those methods were primarily evaluated on rigid, real-world environments. In this study, existing segmentation methods were evaluated for their use on a new dataset of transoral endoscopic exploration. METHODS: Four machine learning-based methods SegNet, UNet, ENet and ErfNet were trained with supervision on a novel 7-class dataset of the human larynx. The dataset contains 536 manually segmented images from two patients during laser incisions. The Intersection-over-Union (IoU) evaluation metric was used to measure the accuracy of each method. Data augmentation and network ensembling were employed to increase segmentation accuracy. Stochastic inference was used to show uncertainties of the individual models. Patient-to-patient transfer was investigated using patient-specific fine-tuning. RESULTS: In this study, a weighted average ensemble network of UNet and ErfNet was best suited for the segmentation of laryngeal soft tissue with a mean IoU of 84.7%. The highest efficiency was achieved by ENet with a mean inference time of 9.22 ms per image. It is shown that 10 additional images from a new patient are sufficient for patient-specific fine-tuning. CONCLUSION: CNN-based methods for semantic segmentation are applicable to endoscopic images of laryngeal soft tissue. The segmentation can be used for active constraints or to monitor morphological changes and autonomously detect pathologies. Further improvements could be achieved by using a larger dataset or training the models in a self-supervised manner on additional unlabeled data.
PURPOSE: Automated segmentation of anatomical structures in medical image analysis is a prerequisite for autonomous diagnosis as well as various computer- and robot-aided interventions. Recent methods based on deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) have outperformed former heuristic methods. However, those methods were primarily evaluated on rigid, real-world environments. In this study, existing segmentation methods were evaluated for their use on a new dataset of transoral endoscopic exploration. METHODS: Four machine learning-based methods SegNet, UNet, ENet and ErfNet were trained with supervision on a novel 7-class dataset of the human larynx. The dataset contains 536 manually segmented images from two patients during laser incisions. The Intersection-over-Union (IoU) evaluation metric was used to measure the accuracy of each method. Data augmentation and network ensembling were employed to increase segmentation accuracy. Stochastic inference was used to show uncertainties of the individual models. Patient-to-patient transfer was investigated using patient-specific fine-tuning. RESULTS: In this study, a weighted average ensemble network of UNet and ErfNet was best suited for the segmentation of laryngeal soft tissue with a mean IoU of 84.7%. The highest efficiency was achieved by ENet with a mean inference time of 9.22 ms per image. It is shown that 10 additional images from a new patient are sufficient for patient-specific fine-tuning. CONCLUSION: CNN-based methods for semantic segmentation are applicable to endoscopic images of laryngeal soft tissue. The segmentation can be used for active constraints or to monitor morphological changes and autonomously detect pathologies. Further improvements could be achieved by using a larger dataset or training the models in a self-supervised manner on additional unlabeled data.
Authors: Nima Tajbakhsh; Jae Y Shin; Suryakanth R Gurudu; R Todd Hurst; Christopher B Kendall; Michael B Gotway Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Marc Aubreville; Christian Knipfer; Nicolai Oetter; Christian Jaremenko; Erik Rodner; Joachim Denzler; Christopher Bohr; Helmut Neumann; Florian Stelzle; Andreas Maier Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Andrew A Gumbs; Vincent Grasso; Nicolas Bourdel; Roland Croner; Gaya Spolverato; Isabella Frigerio; Alfredo Illanes; Mohammad Abu Hilal; Adrian Park; Eyad Elyan Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2022-06-29 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Muhammad Adeel Azam; Claudio Sampieri; Alessandro Ioppi; Pietro Benzi; Giorgio Gregory Giordano; Marta De Vecchi; Valentina Campagnari; Shunlei Li; Luca Guastini; Alberto Paderno; Sara Moccia; Cesare Piazza; Leonardo S Mattos; Giorgio Peretti Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 5.738
Authors: Patrick Schlegel; Stefan Kniesburges; Stephan Dürr; Anne Schützenberger; Michael Döllinger Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Mariëlle J A Jansen; Hugo J Kuijf; Ashis K Dhara; Nick A Weaver; Geert Jan Biessels; Robin Strand; Josien P W Pluim Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-12-17
Authors: Alberto Paderno; Cesare Piazza; Francesca Del Bon; Davide Lancini; Stefano Tanagli; Alberto Deganello; Giorgio Peretti; Elena De Momi; Ilaria Patrini; Michela Ruperti; Leonardo S Mattos; Sara Moccia Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-03-24 Impact factor: 6.244