Erik D Hanson1, Eli Danson1, William S Evans1, William A Wood2, Claudio L Battaglini1,2, Samy Sakkal3,4. 1. Exercise Oncology Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA. 4. College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, AUSTRALIA.
Abstract
Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells have properties of both the innate and adaptive immune systems but are an understudied population within exercise immunology. These lymphocytes aggregate at the mucous membranes, but it is unknown if submaximal exercise alters their circulating numbers or function. PURPOSE: To determine the MAIT cell response to submaximal exercise on activation and homing marker expression and stimulated cytokine production. METHODS: Twenty healthy, young, recreationally active males cycled for 40 min at 86% of VT after an overnight fast. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and labeled to identify specific MAIT cell populations using flow cytometry. Cytokine production after stimulation was also determined. RESULTS: Mucosal-associated invariant T cells were 2.9% of T cells and increased to 3.9% after exercise and with recovery whereas cell numbers significantly increased by 91.5% after exercise before returning to resting levels. Chemokine and activation marker absolute cell number significantly increased while expression levels remained constant but the high levels of CCR5 may help direct MAIT cells to sites of inflammation. After stimulation, TNFα expression significantly increased after exercise before returning to baseline with a similar trend for IFNγ. CONCLUSIONS: The MAIT cell numbers undergo a partial biphasic response after submaximal exercise and appear to be preferentially mobilized within T cells; however, the magnitude of the submaximal response was attenuated relative to maximal exercise. Stimulated MAIT cells increase TNFα expression, indicating greater responsiveness to pathogens after acute exercise.
Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells have properties of both the innate and adaptive immune systems but are an understudied population within exercise immunology. These lymphocytes aggregate at the mucous membranes, but it is unknown if submaximal exercise alters their circulating numbers or function. PURPOSE: To determine the MAIT cell response to submaximal exercise on activation and homing marker expression and stimulated cytokine production. METHODS: Twenty healthy, young, recreationally active males cycled for 40 min at 86% of VT after an overnight fast. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and labeled to identify specific MAIT cell populations using flow cytometry. Cytokine production after stimulation was also determined. RESULTS: Mucosal-associated invariant T cells were 2.9% of T cells and increased to 3.9% after exercise and with recovery whereas cell numbers significantly increased by 91.5% after exercise before returning to resting levels. Chemokine and activation marker absolute cell number significantly increased while expression levels remained constant but the high levels of CCR5 may help direct MAIT cells to sites of inflammation. After stimulation, TNFα expression significantly increased after exercise before returning to baseline with a similar trend for IFNγ. CONCLUSIONS: The MAIT cell numbers undergo a partial biphasic response after submaximal exercise and appear to be preferentially mobilized within T cells; however, the magnitude of the submaximal response was attenuated relative to maximal exercise. Stimulated MAIT cells increase TNFα expression, indicating greater responsiveness to pathogens after acute exercise.
Authors: John P Campbell; Keith Guy; Cormac Cosgrove; Geraint D Florida-James; Richard J Simpson Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2007-10-18 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Timothy S C Hinks; Xiaoying Zhou; Karl J Staples; Borislav D Dimitrov; Alexander Manta; Tanya Petrossian; Pek Y Lum; Caroline G Smith; Jon A Ward; Peter H Howarth; Andrew F Walls; Stephan D Gadola; Ratko Djukanović Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2015-03-05 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Sara Naimimohasses; Philip O'Gorman; Ciara Wright; Deirdre Ni Fhloinn; Dean Holden; Niall Conlon; Ann Monaghan; Megan Kennedy; John Gormley; Peter Beddy; Stephen Patrick Finn; Joanne Lysaght; Jacintha O'Sullivan; Margaret R Dunne; Suzanne Norris; J Bernadette Moore Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Erik D Hanson; Lauren C Bates; Elizabeth P Harrell; David B Bartlett; Jordan T Lee; Chad W Wagoner; Mohamdod S Alzer; Dean J Amatuli; Brian C Jensen; Allison M Deal; Hyman B Muss; Kirsten A Nyrop; Claudio L Battaglini Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 4.253
Authors: Eunhan Cho; Bailey Theall; James Stampley; Joshua Granger; Neil M Johannsen; Brian A Irving; Guillaume Spielmann Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-08-03 Impact factor: 5.048