Literature DB >> 30648779

Comparison of medical management and genetic counseling options pre- and post-whole exome sequencing for patients with positive and negative results.

Margret Matias1,2,3, Katie Wusik1,2, Derek Neilson1, Xue Zhang1, C Alexander Valencia1, Kathleen Collins1,2.   

Abstract

Whole exome sequencing (WES) is expected to impact patient management, but data surrounding the types of downstream effects and how frequently these effects are observed depending on the type of WES results received is limited. This study investigated changes to medical management and genetic counseling (GC) options following WES for individuals with positive and negative results. Electronic medical records of patients who had positive (n = 37) or negative (n = 41) WES results from Cincinnati Children's Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Pre- and post-WES management and GC options were analyzed as were differences between positive and negative results. Almost all participants (97%) were observed to have at least one difference in medical management and/or GC options following WES. Comparing pre- and post-WES detected significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) in genetic testing, imaging, and metabolic testing regardless of WES results. Participants with positive results also had significant differences in recurrence risk, reproductive options, testing for family members, and support groups. Pre- to post-WES differences were significantly different between participants with positive and negative results in specialist referrals, lifestyle recommendations, recurrence risk, and all GC options (p ≤ 0.05); specifically, participants with positive results were more likely to have differences in these categories. Overall, differences in medical management and/or GC options were observed for participants with both types of WES results (positive and negative). Results from this study may contribute to the understanding of how WES impacts patients and their care and thus improve its utilization.
© 2019 National Society of Genetic Counselors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical impact; genetic counseling; genetic testing; medical management; whole exome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30648779     DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  4 in total

Review 1.  Long overdue: including adults with brain disorders in precision health initiatives.

Authors:  Brenda M Finucane; Scott M Myers; Christa L Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice.

Authors:  Barbara Biesecker
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Clinical exome sequencing data reveal high diagnostic yields for congenital diaphragmatic hernia plus (CDH+) and new phenotypic expansions involving CDH.

Authors:  Tiana M Scott; Ian M Campbell; Andres Hernandez-Garcia; Seema R Lalani; Pengfei Liu; Chad A Shaw; Jill A Rosenfeld; Daryl A Scott
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  miRNA Genetic Variants Alter Their Secondary Structure and Expression in Patients With RASopathies Syndromes.

Authors:  Joseane Biso de Carvalho; Guilherme Loss de Morais; Thays Cristine Dos Santos Vieira; Natana Chaves Rabelo; Juan Clinton Llerena; Sayonara Maria de Carvalho Gonzalez; Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.