Literature DB >> 30647178

Predicting Which Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Will Not Attain Early Remission with Conventional Treatment: Results from the ReACCh-Out Cohort.

Jaime Guzman1,2,3, Andrew Henrey4,5,6, Thomas Loughin4,5,6, Roberta A Berard4,5,6, Natalie J Shiff4,5,6, Roman Jurencak4,5,6, Adam M Huber4,5,6, Kiem Oen4,5,6, Kerstin Gerhold4,5,6, Brian M Feldman4,5,6, Rosie Scuccimarri4,5,6, Kristin Houghton4,5,6, Gaëlle Chédeville4,5,6, Kimberly Morishita4,5,6, Bianca Lang4,5,6, Paul Dancey4,5,6, Alan M Rosenberg4,5,6, Julie Barsalou4,5,6, Alessandra Bruns4,5,6, Karen Watanabe Duffy4,5,6, Susanne Benseler4,5,6, Ciaran M Duffy4,5,6, Lori B Tucker4,5,6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the probability of early remission with conventional treatment for each child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Children with a low chance of remission may be candidates for initial treatment with biologics or triple disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD).
METHODS: We used data from 1074 subjects in the Research in Arthritis in Canadian Children emphasizing Outcomes (ReACCh-Out) cohort. The predicted outcome was clinically inactive disease for ≥ 6 months starting within 1 year of JIA diagnosis in patients who did not receive early biologic agents or triple DMARD. Models were developed in 200 random splits of 75% of the cohort and tested on the remaining 25% of subjects, calculating expected and observed frequencies of remission and c-index values.
RESULTS: Our best Cox logistic model combining 18 clinical variables a median of 2 days after diagnosis had a c-index of 0.69 (95% CI 0.67-0.71), better than using JIA category alone (0.59, 95% CI 0.56-0.63). Children in the lowest probability decile had a 20% chance of remission and 21% attained remission; children in the highest decile had a 69% chance of remission and 73% attained remission. Compared to 5% of subjects identified by JIA category alone, the model identified 14% of subjects as low chance of remission (probability < 0.25), of whom 77% failed to attain remission.
CONCLUSION: Although the model did not meet our a priori performance threshold (c-index > 0.70), it identified 3 times more subjects with low chance of remission than did JIA category alone, and it may serve as a benchmark for assessing value added by future laboratory/imaging biomarkers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COHORT STUDIES; JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; RISK STRATIFICATION

Year:  2019        PMID: 30647178     DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.180456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  9 in total

1.  Clinical and associated inflammatory biomarker features predictive of short-term outcomes in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Elham Rezaei; Daniel Hogan; Brett Trost; Anthony J Kusalik; Gilles Boire; David A Cabral; Sarah Campillo; Gaëlle Chédeville; Anne-Laure Chetaille; Paul Dancey; Ciaran Duffy; Karen Watanabe Duffy; John Gordon; Jaime Guzman; Kristin Houghton; Adam M Huber; Roman Jurencak; Bianca Lang; Kimberly Morishita; Kiem G Oen; Ross E Petty; Suzanne E Ramsey; Rosie Scuccimarri; Lynn Spiegel; Elizabeth Stringer; Regina M Taylor-Gjevre; Shirley M L Tse; Lori B Tucker; Stuart E Turvey; Susan Tupper; Rae S M Yeung; Susanne Benseler; Janet Ellsworth; Chantal Guillet; Chandima Karananayake; Nazeem Muhajarine; Johannes Roth; Rayfel Schneider; Alan M Rosenberg
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 2.  Recent progress in the treatment of non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  John M Bridges; Elizabeth D Mellins; Randy Q Cron
Journal:  Fac Rev       Date:  2021-02-26

3.  Validation of prediction models of severe disease course and non-achievement of remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: part 1-results of the Canadian model in the Nordic cohort.

Authors:  Veronika Rypdal; Jaime Guzman; Andrew Henrey; Thomas Loughin; Mia Glerup; Ellen Dalen Arnstad; Kristiina Aalto; Marite Rygg; Susan Nielsen; Troels Herlin; Anders Fasth; Lillemor Berntson; Martin Rypdal; Ellen Nordal
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.156

4.  Drivers of non-zero physician global scores during periods of inactive disease in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  Angelo Ravelli; Alessandro Consolaro; Alessandra Alongi; Gabriella Giancane; Roberta Naddei; Valentina Natoli; Francesca Ridella; Marco Burrone; Silvia Rosina; Gaelle Chedeville; Ekaterina Alexeeva; Gerd Horneff; Ivan Foeldvari; Giovanni Filocamo; Tamàs Constantin; Nicolino Ruperto
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2022-03

Review 5.  Treat to Target (Drug-Free) Inactive Disease in JIA: To What Extent Is This Possible?

Authors:  Athimalaipet V Ramanan; Anne M Sage
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Development and Validation of a Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Flare Measure: Ascertaining Flare in Patients With Inactive Disease.

Authors:  Pamela F Weiss; Timothy G Brandon; Meghan E Ryan; Erin B Treemarcki; Stephanie Armendariz; Tracey B Wright; Chetna Godiwala; Matthew L Stoll; Rui Xiao; Daniel Lovell
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 5.178

7.  Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Childhood Arthritis Limited Examination: A Comprehensive, Reliable, Time-Efficient Assessment of Synovitis.

Authors:  Patricia Vega-Fernandez; Tracy V Ting; Edward J Oberle; Courtney McCracken; Janet Figueroa; Mekibib Altaye; Amy Cassedy; Gurjit S Kaeley; Johannes Roth
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 5.178

8.  Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: what is the optimal target definition to reach all goals?

Authors:  Casper G Schoemaker; Joost F Swart; Nico M Wulffraat
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.054

9.  Validation of prediction models of severe disease course and non-achievement of remission in juvenile idiopathic arthritis part 2: results of the Nordic model in the Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Andrew Henrey; Veronika Rypdal; Martin Rypdal; Thomas Loughin; Ellen Nordal; Jaime Guzman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.156

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.