Literature DB >> 30647148

Internal Gain Modulations, But Not Changes in Stimulus Contrast, Preserve the Neural Code.

Sangkyun Lee1,2, Jiyoung Park3, Stelios M Smirnakis1,2.   

Abstract

Neurons in primary visual cortex are strongly modulated both by stimulus contrast and by fluctuations of internal inputs. An important question is whether the population code is preserved under these conditions. Changes in stimulus contrast are thought to leave the population code invariant, whereas the effect of internal gain modulations remains unknown. To address these questions we studied how the direction-of-motion of oriented gratings is encoded in layer 2/3 primary visual cortex of mouse (with C57BL/6 background, of either sex). We found that, because contrast gain responses across cells are heterogeneous, a change in contrast alters the information distribution profile across cells leading to a violation of contrast invariance. Remarkably, internal input fluctuations that cause commensurate firing rate modulations at the single-cell level result in more homogeneous gain responses, respecting population code invariance. These observations argue that the brain strives to maintain the stability of the neural code in the face of fluctuating internal inputs.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Neuronal responses are modulated both by stimulus contrast and by the spontaneous fluctuation of internal inputs. It is not well understood how these different types of input impact the population code. Specifically, it is important to understand whether the neural code stays invariant in the face of significant internal input modulations. Here, we show that changes in stimulus contrast lead to different optimal population codes, whereas spontaneous internal input fluctuations leave the population code invariant. This is because spontaneous internal input fluctuations modulate the gain of neuronal responses more homogeneously across cells compared to changes in stimulus contrast.
Copyright © 2019 the authors 0270-6474/19/391671-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain states; mouse visual cortex; population codes; two-photon calcium imaging; visual contrast

Year:  2019        PMID: 30647148      PMCID: PMC6391566          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2012-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  43 in total

1.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  M P Sceniak; D L Ringach; M J Hawken; R Shapley
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Small modulation of ongoing cortical dynamics by sensory input during natural vision.

Authors:  József Fiser; Chiayu Chiu; Michael Weliky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Imaging input and output of neocortical networks in vivo.

Authors:  Jason N D Kerr; David Greenberg; Fritjof Helmchen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sparse multinomial logistic regression: fast algorithms and generalization bounds.

Authors:  Balaji Krishnapuram; Lawrence Carin; Mário A T Figueiredo; Alexander J Hartemink
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.226

5.  The emergence of contrast-invariant orientation tuning in simple cells of cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Ian M Finn; Nicholas J Priebe; David Ferster
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Prior experience enhances plasticity in adult visual cortex.

Authors:  Sonja B Hofer; Thomas D Mrsic-Flogel; Tobias Bonhoeffer; Mark Hübener
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-12-04       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Efficient subpixel image registration algorithms.

Authors:  Manuel Guizar-Sicairos; Samuel T Thurman; James R Fienup
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.776

8.  Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window.

Authors:  Anthony Holtmaat; Tobias Bonhoeffer; David K Chow; Jyoti Chuckowree; Vincenzo De Paola; Sonja B Hofer; Mark Hübener; Tara Keck; Graham Knott; Wei-Chung A Lee; Ricardo Mostany; Tom D Mrsic-Flogel; Elly Nedivi; Carlos Portera-Cailliau; Karel Svoboda; Joshua T Trachtenberg; Linda Wilbrecht
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Representation of concurrent stimuli by population activity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Alex R Wade; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  The potential importance of saturating and supersaturating contrast response functions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex.

Authors:  Katie A Ferguson; Jessica A Cardin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Increased Reliability of Visually-Evoked Activity in Area V1 of the MECP2-Duplication Mouse Model of Autism.

Authors:  Ryan T Ash; Ganna Palagina; Jose A Fernandez-Leon; Jiyoung Park; Rob Seilheimer; Sangkyun Lee; Jasdeep Sabharwal; Fredy Reyes; Jing Wang; Dylan Lu; Muhammad Sarfraz; Emmanouil Froudarakis; Andreas S Tolias; Samuel M Wu; Stelios M Smirnakis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.709

3.  In vivo extracellular recordings of thalamic and cortical visual responses reveal V1 connectivity rules.

Authors:  Nataliya Kraynyukova; Simon Renner; Gregory Born; Yannik Bauer; Martin A Spacek; Georgi Tushev; Laura Busse; Tatjana Tchumatchenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  The contribution of low contrast-preferring neurons to information representation in the primary visual cortex after learning.

Authors:  Rie Kimura; Yumiko Yoshimura
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 14.136

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.