Literature DB >> 30647053

Subacromial decompression surgery for adults with shoulder pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Tuomas Lähdeoja1,2, Teemu Karjalainen1,3, Jarkko Jokihaara1,4, Paul Salamh5, Lauri Kavaja6,7, Arnav Agarwal8, Marinus Winters9, Rachelle Buchbinder3, Gordon Guyatt10, Per Olav Vandvik11,12, Clare L Ardern13,14.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery in adult patients with subacromial pain syndrome lasting for more than 3 months.
DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain, physical function and health-related quality of life. DATA SOURCES: Systematic searches for benefits and harms were conducted to 23 July 2018 in MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and Health Technology Assessment. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials comparing subacromial decompression surgery for subacromial pain syndrome with any other treatment(s). For harms, we included prospective cohort studies. REVIEW
METHODS: Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of eligible studies. Thirty patients seeking primary or outpatient care for subacromial pain syndrome and a parallel guideline committee (BMJ Rapid Recommendations) provided input regarding systematic review design and interpretation.
RESULTS: There was high certainty evidence of no additional benefit of subacromial decompression surgery over placebo surgery in reducing pain at 1 year following surgery (mean difference [MD] -0.26, 95% CI -0.84 to 0.33, minimally important difference [MID] 1.5) or improving physical function at 1-2 years (MD 2.8, 95% CI -1.4 to 6.9, MID 8.3). There was moderate certainty evidence for no additional benefit of subacromial decompression surgery on health-related quality of life at 1 year (MD -0.03 points, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.06, MID 0.07). There was moderate certainty evidence for six serious harms per 1000 (95% CI 5 to 7) patients undergoing subacromial decompression.
CONCLUSION: Subacromial decompression surgery provided no important benefit compared with placebo surgery or exercise therapy, and probably carries a small risk of serious harms. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWREGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018086862. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroscopic surgery; exercise rehabilitation; rotator cuff; shoulder

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30647053     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-100486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  15 in total

1.  On Patient Safety: Shoulder "Impingement"-Telling a SAD Story About Public Trust.

Authors:  Teppo L N Järvinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

2.  Histological changes and neural elements in the subacromial bursa on patients with rotator cuff tear: Pilot study.

Authors:  Chang-Hyuk Choi; Dae Gil Kwon; Hoon-Kyu Oh; Jun Young Kim; Dong Rak Kwon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Subacromial impingement syndrome: association of multiple magnetic resonance imaging parameters with shoulder function and pain.

Authors:  Malte Jäschke; Hans-Christian Köhler; Marc-André Weber; Thomas Tischer; Claudia Hacke; Christoph Schulze
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Morphological Characteristics of Acromion and Acromioclavicular Joint in Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Related Recommendations: A Three-Dimensional Analysis Based on Multiplanar Reconstruction of Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Qi Ma; Changjiao Sun; Ruiyong Du; Pu Liu; Sha Wu; Wei Zhang; Ligong Fu; Xu Cai
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Asynchronous and Tailored Digital Rehabilitation of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Dora Janela; Fabíola Costa; Maria Molinos; Robert G Moulder; Jorge Lains; Gerard E Francisco; Virgílio Bento; Steven P Cohen; Fernando Dias Correia
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 6.  Subacromial Bursa: A Neglected Tissue Is Gaining More and More Attention in Clinical and Experimental Research.

Authors:  Franka Klatte-Schulz; Kathi Thiele; Markus Scheibel; Georg N Duda; Britt Wildemann
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Unintended consequences: quantifying the benefits, iatrogenic harms and downstream cascade costs of musculoskeletal MRI in UK primary care.

Authors:  Imran Mohammed Sajid; Anand Parkunan; Kathleen Frost
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-07

8.  Subacromial decompression surgery for rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  Teemu V Karjalainen; Nitin B Jain; Cristina M Page; Tuomas A Lähdeoja; Renea V Johnston; Paul Salamh; Lauri Kavaja; Clare L Ardern; Arnav Agarwal; Per O Vandvik; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-01-17

9.  No relationship between the acromiohumeral distance and pain in adults with subacromial pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Soo Whan Park; Yuan Tai Chen; Lindsay Thompson; Andreas Kjoenoe; Birgit Juul-Kristensen; Vinicius Cavalheri; Leanda McKenna
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: a 5-year follow-up of a randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Mika Paavola; Teppo L Järvinen; Kari Kanto; Jonas Ranstam; Antti Malmivaara; Jari Inkinen; Juha Kalske; Vesa Savolainen; Ilkka Sinisaari; Simo Taimela
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.