| Literature DB >> 30646499 |
Hu Cui1,2, Yang Ou3, Lixia Wang4, Baixing Yan5, Lu Han6,7, Yingxin Li8,9.
Abstract
Phosphorus inpan> agro-epan> class="Chemical">cosystems has attracted much attention due to its impact on the nutrient supply of plants and the risk of loss of non-point source pollution. This study investigated the fraction distribution and release of phosphorus from soil aggregates structure under different land uses (rice, maize and soybean). The soil aggregates were characterized as large macro-aggregates (L-mac, >1 mm), small macro-aggregates (S-mac, 0.25⁻1 mm), micro-aggregates (MIC, 0.053⁻0.25 mm) and silt clay (SC, <0.053 mm) with the wet-sieving method. A sequential chemical extraction scheme was used to separate phosphorus into labile inorganic phosphorus (L-Pi), labile organic phosphorus (L-Po), moderately labile organic phosphorus (Ml-Po), iron-aluminum bound phosphorus (Fe.Al-P), calcium-magnesium bound phosphorus (Ca.Mg-P), humic phosphorus (Hu-P) and residual phosphorus (Re-P). Experimental results indicated that soil aggregates were mainly S-mac and MIC, followed by L-mac and SC, and they accounted for 52.16%, 25.20%, 14.23% and 8.49% in rice fields, 44.21%, 34.61%, 12.88% and 8.30% in maize fields, and 28.87%, 47.63%, 3.52% and 19.99% in soybean fields, respectively. Total nitrogen (TN), soil organic matter (SOM), Fe and Mn in soil aggregate fractions decreased with the reduction in soil aggregate grain-sizes. For phosphorus fractions (P-fractions), Fe.Al-P and Re-P tended to condense in L-mac and S-mac. MIC and SC were the primary carriers of Ca.Mg-P. Adsorption isotherm simulation results demonstrated that L-mac and S-mac have a strong capacity to retain phosphorus. In rice fields, phosphorus bioavailability and utilization rate were high. However, the P-fractions there were easily changed under aerobic-anaerobic conditions. Therefore, the risk of phosphorus loss during drainage should be given considerable attention.Entities:
Keywords: Sanjiang Plain; adsorption isotherm simulation; phosphorus fractions; soil aggregates
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30646499 PMCID: PMC6351903 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16020212
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Chemical properties of soil samples under different land uses.
| Farmland | pH | EC | TN | TP | SOM | Fe | Mn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | µs/cm | mg/kg | mg/kg | g/kg | g/kg | g/kg | |
| Rice | 5.29 ± 0.21 a | 82.45 ± 9.98 a | 1802.75 ± 176.42 a | 792.46 ± 175.97 a | 47.55 ± 9.83 a | 35.96 ± 1.02 a | 1.34 ± 0.40 a |
| Maize | 5.21 ± 0.04 a | 57.29 ± 6.25 a | 1715.50 ± 94.05 a | 1052.54 ± 341.70 a | 44.15 ± 1.34 a | 41.92 ± 3.85 a | 1.27 ± 0.13 a |
| Soybean | 5.34 ± 0.01 a | 78.89 ± 6.93 a | 1016.25 ± 238.6 b | 893.60 ± 24.91 a | 28.05 ± 5.30 a | 20.34 ± 1.44 b | 0.22 ± 0.02 b |
Note: the letters a, b indicate the significant difference in the chemical properties of soil samples under different land uses. TN: Total nitrogen; TP: total phosphorus; SOM: soil organic matter.
Figure 1Variation in soil aggregate fractions of farmland. Note: the letters a, b indicate the significant difference in the amount of the same grain-size soil aggregate under different land uses.
Figure 2The content of (a) TN (Total nitrogen), (b) SOM (soil organic matter), (c) Fe and (d) Mn in soil aggregate fractions. Note: the letters a, b indicate the significant difference in the amount of chemical indicators in the same grain-size soil aggregate under different land uses.
Figure 3The content of (a) TP (total phosphorus), (b) L-Pi (labile inorganic phosphorus), (c) L-Po (labile organic phosphorus), (d) Ml-Po (moderately labile organic phosphorus), (e) Fe.Al-P (iron-aluminum bound phosphorus), (f) Ca.Mg-P (calcium-magnesium bound phosphorus), (g) Hu-P (humic phosphorus) and (h) Re-P (residual phosphorus) in soil aggregate fractions. Note: the letters a, b indicate the significant difference in the amount of phosphorus fractions in the same grain-size soil aggregate under different land uses.
Figure 4Variation in the quantity of adsorbed phosphorus with phosphorus concentration in equilibrium liquid.
The results of adsorption isotherm simulation.
| Soil Aggregate Fractions | Farmland | Langmuir | Freundlich | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| MBC |
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| >1 | Rice | 2020.41 ± 28.86 a | 2239.82 ± 991.87 a | 1.11 ± 0.51 a | 0.930 | 0.266 |
| Maize | 2037.04 ± 261.89 a | 1605.39 ± 502.60 a | 0.81 ± 0.35 a | 0.917 | 0.276 | |
| Soybean | 1923.08 ± 0.00 a | 654.01 ± 78.08 a | 0.34 ± 0.04 a | 0.876 | 0.008 | |
| 0.25–1 | Rice | 1562.50 ± 0.00 a | 1204.98 ± 406.66 a | 0.77 ± 0.26 a | 0.985 | 0.103 |
| Maize | 1440.71 ± 73.29 a | 872.95 ± 238.61 a | 0.61 ± 0.20 a | 0.982 | 0.002 | |
| Soybean | 1120.15 ± 79.65 b | 266.42 ± 28.45 a | 0.24 ± 0.04 a | 0.949 | 0.135 | |
| 0.053–0.25 | Rice | 1590.91 ± 107.14 a | 520.07 ± 101.32 a | 0.33 ± 0.09 a | 0.888 | 0.044 |
| Maize | 1399.22 ± 41.51 a | 357.13 ± 36.78 a | 0.26 ± 0.03 a | 0.806 | 0.299 | |
| Soybean | 594.23 ± 54.70 b | 229.31 ± 58.96 a | 0.39 ± 0.14 a | 0.960 | 0.057 | |
| <0.053 | Rice | 1459.93 ± 15.07 a | 395.60 ± 29.79 a | 0.25 ± 0.02 a | 0.903 | 0.224 |
| Maize | 583.13 ± 7.21 b | 487.37 ± 55.07 a | 0.21 ± 0.02 a | 0.998 | 0.201 | |
| Soybean | 676.45 ± 183.85 b | 149.06 ± 28.09 b | 0.68 ± 0.13 b | 0.900 | 0.277 | |
Note: the letters a, b indicate the significant difference in simulation parameters of the same grain-size aggregate under different land uses. MBC: Maximum buffer capacity.
Correlation analysis results between phosphorus fractions and soil chemical properties.
| Chemical Properties | L-Pi | L-Po | Ml-Po | Fe.Al-P | Ca.Mg-P | Hu-P | Re-P | TP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TN | 0.125 | 0.577 ** | 0.109 | 0.766 ** | −0.292 | 0.405 * | 0.786 ** | 0.497 * |
| SOM | −0.019 | 0.547 ** | 0.123 | 0.566 ** | −0.314 | 0.499 * | 0.655 ** | 0.339 |
| Fe | −0.072 | 0.451 * | −0.132 | 0.626 ** | −0.261 | 0.231 | 0.771 ** | 0.484 * |
| Mn | 0.212 | 0.457 * | 0.138 | 0.742 ** | −0.371 | 0.463 ** | 0.862 ** | 0.486 * |
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level; ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.