Tory R Spindle1, Thomas Eissenberg2. 1. Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
There has been a recent and substantial shift in the tobacco and/or nicotine
product landscape. Tobacco cigarettes, after dominating the market in the last century,
have been surpassed by electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as the most commonly used
tobacco product among youths.[1]
E-cigarettes are a class of products that use a heating element to aerosolize a liquid
for users to inhale; the liquid typically contains nicotine, various flavorants, and
solvents such as propylene glycol and/or vegetable glycerin. A study by McKelvey and
colleagues[2] highlights the
ascension of a new iteration of e-cigarettes known as pod mods and corroborates numerous
reports in popular media that have documented the increase in popularity of one pod mod
in particular, JUUL, among adolescents and young adults.The study assessed the use of pod-based e-cigarettes, conventional or non-pod mod
e-cigarettes, and tobacco cigarettes among California high school students (N = 445). As
in larger surveys, ever product use was higher for conventional e-cigarettes relative to
tobacco cigarettes, but participants reported using pod-based e-cigarettes in the past
30 days and 7 days at the highest frequency. Consistent with another recent study of
adolescents,[3] approximately 60%
of those who reported ever use of pod-based e-cigarettes also reported past 30-day use
(37% also reported pod-based e-cigarette use in the past 7 days). Also, similar to
national youth surveys,[4] a much smaller
proportion of ever users of conventional e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes also
reported past 30-day (<30%) or 7-day use of those products (<20%). Thus,
crucially, youths who try pod-based e-cigarettes appear to be far more likely to become
regular users compared with those who try other e-cigarettes or tobacco cigarettes,
although longitudinal studies are necessary to confirm this assertion.Several features of pod-based e-cigarettes have likely contributed to their
increase in popularity among youths. First, these devices can be used discretely, as
they easily are concealable and produce relatively little visible aerosol (or vapor).
These qualities make them ideal to use in locations where e-cigarette use is forbidden
such as on school grounds as is often reported in popular media articles. Second, as
with conventional e-cigarettes, they come in a variety of flavors such as mango,
crème brûlée, cool mint, and fruit medley. Third, innovative
marketing campaigns on social media platforms[5] undoubtedly helped pod-based e-cigarettes to capture the
majority (72%) of the US e-cigarette market.[6] Third, pod-based e-cigarettes contain high levels of nicotine, the
primary addictive constituent of tobacco products. Product labeling claims pods contain
59 mg/mL of nicotine, yet actual concentrations can be much higher (eg, 75
mg/mL).[7] The nicotine contained
in pods is predominantly in a protonated form (referred to as nicotine salts), unlike
conventional e-cigarette liquids that contain a nonprotonated or free base form of
nicotine. Under some conditions, pod-based e-cigarettes can deliver nicotine to pod
mod–naive cigarette smokers at levels that are comparable with their own brand of
cigarettes[8] but nicotine
delivery also appears to vary widely among these individuals.[7,8] More
research is needed to elucidate the nicotine delivery profile of experienced pod-based
e-cigarette users and the comparative pharmacokinetics of protonated and nonprotonated
nicotine from pod mods and other e-cigarettes.Whatever the cause, the seemingly widespread use of pod mod e-cigarettes among
youths could have detrimental consequences for public health. Although e-cigarettes
typically emit less toxicants than tobacco cigarettes, they are not toxicant-free. When
heated and aerosolized, the contents of e-cigarette liquids can undergo thermal
decomposition, resulting in the formation of toxic and/or carcinogenic carbonyls,
furans, and other harmful compounds.[9]
E-cigarette aerosols can also contain other toxicants such as reactive oxygen species
(free radicals) and heavy metals.[9]
Potential adverse health effects of e-cigarette use can include respiratory and mucosal
irritation and/or inflammation, acute adverse cardiovascular effects, and increased
oxidative stress.[9] Repeated nicotine
exposure can also influence the development of the adolescent brain, particularly in the
prefrontal cortex, which does not reach maturity until the mid 20s.[9] Finally, nicotine-naive adolescents who try
e-cigarettes are more likely to initiate tobacco smoking.[9] In the study by McKelvey and
colleagues,[2] among ever users
of any tobacco product, 25% reported ever use of pod-based e-cigarettes, conventional
e-cigarettes, and tobacco cigarettes, while only 2% reported ever use of pod-based
e-cigarettes only. Thus, pod-based e-cigarettes may be used at a high rate in
combination with other addictive and potentially more harmful products. To determine to
what extent these devices promote the use of other tobacco products, national
longitudinal surveys must quickly begin to include items assessing pod mod use.Some of the same qualities of pod-based e-cigarettes that make them dangerous for
youths suggest promise as an effective smoking cessation aid. For example, pod mods can
deliver high levels of nicotine capable of suppressing adverse symptoms associated with
nicotine and/or tobacco abstinence and are relatively easy to use. Moreover, design
features of pod mods may increase the overall safety profile relative to cigarettes and
some other e-cigarettes. For instance, JUUL restricts users to 5-second puffs,[7] the heating element is disabled at
215°C,[7] and users cannot
modify the power output. Further, unlike most e-cigarettes, users do not add e-cigarette
liquid to the JUUL but rather each pod comes prefilled. Overall, standardization of
e-cigarette device and liquid features and allowable puffing behaviors could help
mitigate toxicant emissions and deter unintended uses for these products, but more
research is needed to establish the ideal parameters for minimizing harm. These safety
features of pod-based e-cigarettes notwithstanding, these devices should not be in the
hands of adolescents, as no amount of long-term nicotine exposure is likely safe for
youths.If pod mods or e-cigarettes are to have any benefit to public health,
youths’ use and access to these products must be reduced drastically. The US Food
and Drug Administration recently acted to deter the sale of pod-based e-cigarettes to
underage youths both online and in retail locations. While this is an important first
step, efforts to restrict marketing that targets youths, particularly on social media,
and limit the availability of attractive flavors could also be effective in curtailing
pod-based e-cigarette use. Given that most smokers who switch to e-cigarettes begin with
either tobacco or menthol flavors,[10]
other flavor categories that attract youths are likely unnecessary. Tellingly, only 1
individual in the study by McKelvey and colleagues[2] reported that their first pod was tobacco flavored. JUUL
recently began selling lower nicotine concentrations for 2 flavors (tobacco and cool
mint), but not for their other fruit and dessert flavors that may directly appeal to
adolescents. If left unaddressed, the combination of appealing flavors and high nicotine
concentrations in pod mods could undermine tobacco control efforts.Importantly, the numerous other pod mods on the market should not be overlooked.
These other devices, including Bo, Kwit Stick, Mistic, Rubi, and Suorin share similar
design features to JUUL and their liquids may also contain pronated nicotine. Indeed,
protonated nicotine used to refill some pod mods can be purchased in concentrations as
high as 60 mg/mL, with flavors like cotton candy, donut cream, and gummy bear.
Additionally, pod mods containing Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the primary
psychoactive constituent of cannabis, have emerged. Youths’ access and use of
these and other pod mods should be monitored and scrutinized. Without swift public
health and regulatory action, pod mods and e-cigarettes could contribute to a new
epidemic of nicotine addiction that may well be accompanied by novel health threats.
Authors: Jeffrey G Willett; Morgane Bennett; Elizabeth C Hair; Haijuan Xiao; Marisa S Greenberg; Emily Harvey; Jennifer Cantrell; Donna Vallone Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: M B Harrell; S R Weaver; A Loukas; M Creamer; C N Marti; C D Jackson; J W Heath; P Nayak; C L Perry; T F Pechacek; M P Eriksen Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2016-11-11
Authors: H Isabella Lanza; Adam M Leventhal; Junhan Cho; Jessica L Braymiller; Evan A Krueger; Rob McConnell; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: L Morgan Snell; Nicole Nicksic; Dimitra Panteli; Sara Burke; Thomas Eissenberg; Giovanni Fattore; Charmaine Gauci; Helena Koprivnikar; Liuba Murauskiene; Marge Reinap; Andrew J Barnes Journal: Health Policy Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 2.980