Literature DB >> 30646073

Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey.

Loai Albarqouni1, Tammy Hoffmann1, Sharon Straus2,3, Nina Rydland Olsen4, Taryn Young5,6, Dragan Ilic7, Terrence Shaneyfelt8,9, R Brian Haynes10, Gordon Guyatt10, Paul Glasziou1.   

Abstract

Importance: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is necessary for improving the quality of health care as well as patient outcomes. Evidence-based practice is commonly integrated into the curricula of undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing professional development health programs. There is, however, inconsistency in the curriculum content of EBP teaching and learning programs. A standardized set of minimum core competencies in EBP that health professionals should meet has the potential to standardize and improve education in EBP. Objective: To develop a consensus set of core competencies for health professionals in EBP. Evidence Review: For this modified Delphi survey study, a set of EBP core competencies that should be covered in EBP teaching and learning programs was developed in 4 stages: (1) generation of an initial set of relevant EBP competencies derived from a systematic review of EBP education studies for health professionals; (2) a 2-round, web-based Delphi survey of health professionals, selected using purposive sampling, to prioritize and gain consensus on the most essential EBP core competencies; (3) consensus meetings, both face-to-face and via video conference, to finalize the consensus on the most essential core competencies; and (4) feedback and endorsement from EBP experts. Findings: From an earlier systematic review of 83 EBP educational intervention studies, 86 unique EBP competencies were identified. In a Delphi survey of 234 participants representing a range of health professionals (physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals) who registered interest (88 [61.1%] women; mean [SD] age, 45.2 [10.2] years), 184 (78.6%) participated in round 1 and 144 (61.5%) in round 2. Consensus was reached on 68 EBP core competencies. The final set of EBP core competencies were grouped into the main EBP domains. For each key competency, a description of the level of detail or delivery was identified. Conclusions and Relevance: A consensus-based, contemporary set of EBP core competencies has been identified that may inform curriculum development of entry-level EBP teaching and learning programs for health professionals and benchmark standards for EBP teaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30646073     DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


  42 in total

1.  Comparison of the Informed Health Choices Key Concepts Framework to other frameworks relevant to teaching and learning how to think critically about health claims and choices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew D Oxman; Laura Martínez García
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-03-05

2.  Baseless Claims and Pseudoscience in Health and Wellness: A Call to Action for the Sports, Exercise, and Nutrition-Science Community.

Authors:  Nicholas B Tiller; John P Sullivan; Panteleimon Ekkekakis
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  From Evidence Synthesis to Transfer: Results from a Qualitative Case Study with the Perspectives of Participants.

Authors:  Cristina Lavareda Baixinho; Óscar Ferreira; Marcelo Medeiros; Ellen Synthia Fernandes de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Who? What? Where? A snapshot of Nuclear Medicine Research Presentations from recent ANZSNM conferences in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Pinson
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

5.  Evidence-Based Medicine Training in United States-Based Physiatry Residency Programs.

Authors:  Thiru M Annaswamy; John-Ross Rizzo; Amy Schnappinger; David C Morgenroth; Julia Patrick Engkasan; Elena Ilieva; W David Arnold; Michael L Boninger; Allison C Bean; Carmen M Cirstea; Brad E Dicianno; Michael Fredericson; Prakash Jayabalan; Preeti Raghavan; Lumy Sawaki; Pradeep Suri; Stacy J Suskauer; Qing Mei Wang; Maryam Hosseini; Christina M Case; John Whyte; Sabrina Paganoni
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Improved Preoperative Risk-Assessment Tools Are Needed to Guide Informed Decision-Making Before Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Katherine D Gray; Tamar B Nobel; Meier Hsu; Kay See Tan; Neel Chudgar; Shi Yan; Valerie W Rusch; David R Jones; Gaetano Rocco; Daniela Molena; James M Isbell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 13.787

7.  Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices.

Authors:  Andrew David Oxman; Iain Chalmers; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-11-12

8.  The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Patricia Atkinson; Douglas Badenoch; Paul Glasziou; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Andy Oxman; Mike Clarke
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2019-02-04

9.  Collegiate Student-Athletes' Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care Delivered by Athletic Trainers.

Authors:  Ansley Smallen Redinger; Zachary K Winkelmann; Lindsey E Eberman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Core Evidence-Based Practice Competencies and Learning Outcomes for European Nurses: Consensus Statements.

Authors:  Jakub Dolezel; Renata Zelenikova; Stefano Finotto; Daniela Mecugni; Athina Patelarou; Mariusz Panczyk; Maria Ruzafa-Martínez; Antonio Jesús Ramos-Morcillo; Brigita Skela-Savič; Joanna Gotlib; Evridiki Patelarou; Marta Smodiš; Darja Jarosova
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.