| Literature DB >> 30645765 |
Surupa Roy1, Tathagata Banerjee2.
Abstract
We consider the estimation of the prevalence of a rare disease, and the log-odds ratio for two specified groups of individuals from group testing data. For a low-prevalence disease, the maximum likelihood estimate of the log-odds ratio is severely biased. However, Firth correction to the score function leads to a considerable improvement of the estimator. Also, for a low-prevalence disease, if the diagnostic test is imperfect, the group testing is found to yield more precise estimate of the log-odds ratio than the individual testing.Keywords: Firth correction; exposure status; maximum likelihood estimate; prevalence of a disease; sensitivity; specificity
Year: 2019 PMID: 30645765 DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201800125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biom J ISSN: 0323-3847 Impact factor: 2.207