Literature DB >> 30644573

Repeatability of tools to assist in the follow up and troubleshooting of sacral neuromodulation patients using the sensory response.

Donald Vaganée1,2, Sigrid Van de Borne1,2, Erik Fransen3, Jeroen Voorham4, Petra Voorham-van der Zalm4, Stefan De Wachter1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is an established minimally invasive therapy for functional disorders of the pelvic organs in which electrodes are stimulated in proximity of the sacral spinal nerves. Reprogramming of the electrodes is regularly required and is based on the sensory response. This study assesses the repeatability of a pelvic chart and grading system to enable a more objective assessment of the sensory response upon electrode stimulation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 26 SNM patients, with OAB or NOUR, assessment of the sensory response was done using the sensory threshold (ST) and a pelvic chart with 1 cm2 coordinates, each coordinate corresponding with a dermatome and location of sensation (LoS). A grading system was developed based upon the ST and LoS. Repeatability of ST was assessed using a two-way mixed effects, absolute agreement, single rater/measurement intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and displayed using a correlation and Bland Altman plot. Repeatability of dermatomes, LoS, and grading system was assessed using kappa correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: On average, 1.55 ± 0.85 coordinates were used to point out the area where the stimulation was perceived. The mean amount of coordinates between the area pointed at during the first and second measurement was 0.47 ± 0.74. ST showed excellent repeatability (ICC 0.93, 95%CI 0.90-0.94, P < 0.001). Dermatomes, LoS and grading system showed a substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.740-0.833, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The pelvic chart and grading system, using the sensory response upon electrode stimulation, are repeatable tools and can be used to assist in follow up and troubleshooting of SNM patients.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  new instrumentation; overactive bladder; pelvic floor; pelvic organ dysfunction; sacral neurostimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30644573     DOI: 10.1002/nau.23925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  3 in total

1.  Data Gap in Sacral Neuromodulation Documentation: Call to Improve Documentation Protocols.

Authors:  Christopher M Hornung; Ranveer Vasdev; Kate A Hanson; Rachael Gotlieb; Cynthia S Fok; John Fischer; Nissrine A Nakib; Dwight E Nelson
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 2.  Programming Algorithms for Sacral Neuromodulation: Clinical Practice and Evidence-Recommendations for Day-to-Day Practice.

Authors:  Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Thomas C Dudding; Charles H Knowles; Stefan de Wachter; Stefan Engelberg; Klaus E Matzel
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-03-09

Review 3.  Reprogramming Sacral Neuromodulation for Sub-Optimal Outcomes: Evidence and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Dudding; Paul A Lehur; Michael Sørensen; Stefan Engelberg; Maria Paola Bertapelle; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Karel Everaert; Philip Van Kerrebroeck; Charles H Knowles; Lilli Lundby; Klaus E Matzel; Arantxa Muñoz-Duyos; Mona B Rydningen; Stefan de Wachter
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-07-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.