| Literature DB >> 30643996 |
Karolina Lewińska1, Anna Karczewska2.
Abstract
Great concern has been recently focused on antimony in the environment due to the potential risks posed by this metalloid to humans. In Poland, the concentrations of Sb in soils have not been well recognized. The aim of this study was to identify the sites in south-western Poland where soils are considerably enriched in Sb and to make a rough assessment of a related environmental risk. One hundred forty-four samples were collected from 20 Lower Silesian locations chosen as potentially enriched in Sb that included historical mining sites, tailings impoundments, close vicinities of operating copper smelters, and landfills as well as currently operating and historical shooting ranges. Total concentrations of Sb in soils were determined, and related pollution indices were calculated. Several locations were found where soils contain high concentrations of Sb, with a maximum that exceeded 5600 mg kg-1 Sb in the alluvial soil affected by historical mining. Sequential extraction showed a considerably high percentage of Sb extracted in potentially soluble fractions 1 (non-specifically sorbed) and 2 (specifically sorbed), particularly in the samples collected from shooting ranges and in some samples from historical mine areas. This result provides a strong premise for further risk- and remediation-oriented examination of soils in those sites. More detailed research is needed to determine a spatial extent of soil contamination in the sites identified as highly enriched in Sb. Contrary to these findings, soil material collected from copper tailings impoundments, surroundings of smelters, and landfills did not show any particular enrichment in Sb.Entities:
Keywords: Antimony; Geoaccumulation index; Mining; Shooting range; Soil; Speciation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30643996 PMCID: PMC6331504 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7214-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Monit Assess ISSN: 0167-6369 Impact factor: 2.513
Assessment of soil pollution based on the EF values (Sutherland 2000)
| Value | Soil contamination category |
|---|---|
| EF < 2 | Depletion to minimal enrichment suggestive of no or minimal pollution |
| 2 < EF < 5 | Moderate enrichment, suggestive of moderate pollution |
| 5 < EF < 20 | Significant enrichment, suggestive of significant pollution signal |
| 20 < EF < 40 | Very highly enriched, indicating a very strong pollution signal |
| EF > 40 | Extremely enriched, indicating an extreme pollution signal |
The classes of soil quality based on Igeo values (Müller 1986; Loska et al. 2004; El-Badry and Khalifa 2017; Kowalska et al. 2018)
| Class | Value | Soil quality |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Practically unpolluted | |
| 1 | 0 < | Unpolluted to moderately polluted |
| 2 | 1 < | Moderately polluted |
| 3 | 2 < | Moderately to strongly polluted |
| 4 | 3 < | Strongly polluted |
| 5 | 4 < | Strongly to very strongly polluted |
| 6 | 5 < | Very strongly polluted |
Procedure of sequential extraction based on Wenzel et al. (2001)
| Fraction | Extractant | Extraction conditions | SSR* | Wash step |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | (NH4)2SO4 (0.05 M) | 4 h shaking, 20 °C | 1:25 | – |
| 2 | (NH4)H2PO4 (0.05 M) | 16 h shaking, 20 °C | 1:25 | – |
| 3 | NH4-oxalate buffer (0.2 M); pH 3.25 | 4 h shaking in the dark, 20 °C | 1:25 | NH4-oxalate (0.2 M); pH 3.25 SSR 1:12.5; 10 min shaking in the dark |
| 4 | NH4-oxalate buffer (0.2 M); + ascorbic acid (0.1 M) pH 3.25 | 30 min in a water basin at 96 ± 3 °C in the light | 1:25 | NH4-oxalate (0.2 M); pH 3.25 SSR 1:12.5; 10 min shaking in the dark |
| 5 | HCl:HNO3 (3:1) | Microwave digestion | 1:50 |
*SSR soil to solution ratio
Fig. 1Location of sampling sites. Historical mining areas: 1. Bardo, 2. Bystrzyca Górna, 3. Czarnów, 4. Dębowina, 5. Dziećmorowice, 6. Modliszów, 7. Radzimowice, 8. Rościszów, 9. Srebrna Góra, 10. Złoty Stok, 11. Złoty Stok valley. Copper industry: 12. Legnica copper smelter, 13. Głogów copper smelter, 14. Wartowice tailings impoundment, 15. Żelazny Most tailings impoundment. Shooting ranges: 16. Wrocław, 17. Oleśnica. Landfills: 18. Swojec, 19. Ziębicka, 20. Nowa Wieś Legnicka
Description of sampling sites with their current type of use
| Location | Sampling site | Geographical region | Depth (cm) | Number of samples | Type of use | Additional information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical mining areas | Bardo | Bardzkie Mts. | 0–10 | 3 | Dump | Very coarse and gravel |
| Bystrzyca Górna | Sowie Mts. | 0–10 | 6 | Forest/dump | Coarse; up to 6070 mg kg−1 Pb, 6840 mg kg−1 Zn | |
| Czarnów | Rudawy Janowickie Mts. | 0–10 | 4 | Slag dump | Very coarse and gravel; up to 49,900 mg kg−1 As | |
| 0–10 | 7 | Forest/dump | ||||
| 0–10 | 4 | Grassland | ||||
| 10–25 | 3 | Grassland | ||||
| Dębowina | Bardzkie Mts. | 0–10 | 10 | Forest/dump | Up to 2797 mg kg−1 As | |
| 10–25 | 2 | |||||
| Dziećmorowice | Sowie Mts. | 0–10 | 4 | Woodland/dump | Up to 8899 mg kg−1 Ba | |
| Modliszów | Sowie Mts. | 0–10 | 2 | Forest/dump | Gravel; up to 14,460 mg kg−1 Pb | |
| Radzimowice | Kaczawskie Mts. | 0–10 | 10 | Forest/dump | Up to 27,500 mg kg−1 As | |
| Radzimowice (Olszanka) | 0–10 | 4 | Forest (alluvium of mine draining streams) | Up to 16,000 mg kg−1 As | ||
| Rościszów | Sowie Mts. | 0–10 | 3 | Forest/dump | Up to 3310 mg kg−1 Pb | |
| Srebrna Góra | Sowie Mts. | 0–10 | 9 | Forest/dump | Up to 57,300 mg kg−1 Pb | |
| Złoty Stok | Złote Mts. | 0–10 | 10 | Forest/dump | Up to 44,520 mg kg−1 As | |
| Złoty Stok | 0–10 | 6 | Slag dump | Up to 16,680 mg kg−1 As | ||
| Złoty Stok Trująca valley | 0–25 | 4 | Grassland | Up to 3620 mg kg−1 As | ||
| Copper industry | Legnica copper smelter | The Legnica plain | 0–15 | 5 | Forest | Up to 5250 mg kg−1 Cu and 1125 mg kg−1 Pb |
| Głogów copper smelter | Dalkowskie Hills | 0–15 | 3 | Forest | Up to 1300 mg kg−1 Cu | |
| Wartowice tailings impoundment | Bory Dolnośląskie | 0–15 | 1 | Tailings impoundment | Up to 2790 mg kg−1 Cu | |
| Żelazny Most tailings impoundment | Lubińska upland | 0–15 | 4 | Tailings impoundment | Up to 1974 mg kg−1 Cu | |
| Shooting range | Wrocław | The Wroclaw plain | 0–10 | 12 | Grassland | Up to 29,540 mg kg−1 Pb |
| 10–25 | 8 | Under grass | ||||
| Oleśnica | 0–15 | 5 | Forest | Up to 1388 mg kg−1 Pb | ||
| Landfills | Swojczyce | Silesian plain | 0–25 | 6 | Farmland, grassland | Municipal |
| Ziębicka | Silesian plain | 0–25 | 8 | Grassland, woodland | From the gas plant/municipal | |
| Nowa Wieś Legnicka | The Legnica plain | 0–10 | 2 | Grassland, woodland | Wastes with unknown origin |
Fig. 2Maximum concentrations of Sb in soils
Soil samples selected for sequential extraction
| Location | Sampling site | Symbol | Textural groupa | C org. % | pH | Total Sb mg kg−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Historical mining sites | Dębowina (0–10 cm) | D-1 | LS | 17.4 | 3.2 | 179 |
| Dębowina (10–25 cm) | D-2 | SL | 4.0 | 3.4 | 437 | |
| Bystrzyca Górna | B | LS | 2.6 | 5.4 | 92.3 | |
| Dziećmorowice | DZ | SL | 5.2 | 5.6 | 151 | |
| Srebrna Góra | SG | L | 1.6 | 5.3 | 170 | |
| Radzimowice | R-1 | L | 1.9 | 2.8 | 148 | |
| Radzimowice (Olszanka) | R-2 | L | 3.6 | 7.1 | 5650 | |
| Złoty Stok | ZS-1 | LS | 0.8 | 7.3 | 41.0 | |
| Złoty Stok valley | ZS-2 | SL | 4.7 | 6.0 | 29.5 | |
| Shooting ranges | Wrocław | W | S | 3.5 | 6.5 | 89.6 |
| Oleśnica 1 | O1 | S | 0.1 | 8.0 | 4.15 | |
| Oleśnica 4 | O4 | S | 0.2 | 7.7 | 40.1 |
aS sand, LS loamy sand, SL sandy loam, L loam, SiL silt loam
Description of basic properties of soil samples and results of enrichment factor (EF) and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) for antimony in soil samples
| Location | Sampling site | Textural groupa | C org. % | pH range | Sb concentrations, mg kg−1 | EF |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | Mean | Median | Min | Max | Median | Max | Min | Median | |||||
| Historical mining areas | Bardo | LS-SL | 2.1–4.7 | 3.9–6.6 | 0.14 | 0.76 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.07 | 0.77 | 0.09 | − 1.05 | − 0.58 | − 0.65 |
| Bystrzyca Górna | LS-SL | 1.0–2.6 | 3.3–5.4 | 0.13 | 123 | 36.3 | 0.94 | 0.34 | 259 | 3.40 | − 2.32 | 8.34 | 0.54 | |
| Czarnów | S-SL | 0.2–17.5 | 2.9–7.1 | 0.01 | 16.6 | 1.3 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 8.74 | 0.22 | − 6.77 | 5.87 | − 1.55 | |
| Dębowina | S-L | 0.5–17.4 | 3.0–6.0 | 0.33 | 437 | 54.7 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 823 | 0.82 | − 1.34 | 9.34 | 0.01 | |
| Dziećmorowice | LS-SL | 2.3–5.2 | 7.5–8.0 | 0.05 | 151 | 62.8 | 50.0 | 0.09 | 209 | 64.8 | − 4.14 | 7.39 | 2.39 | |
| Modliszów | LS | 0.8–6.0 | 4.4–5.5 | 0.08 | 99.2 | 49.6 | 49.6 | 0.42 | 317 | 177 | − 1.76 | 8.44 | 4.85 | |
| Radzimowice | S-SL | 1.8–7.8 | 2.8–6.4 | 0.06 | 5650 | 499 | 13.3 | 0.10 | 2172 | 26.5 | − 3.59 | 13.0 | 3.36 | |
| Rościszów | LS-SL | 1.2–5.2 | 3.7–4.8 | 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.01 | − 9.28 | − 1.73 | − 7.23 | |
| Srebrna Góra | LS-L | 1.0–2.1 | 3.2–7.0 | 0.02 | 170 | 25.4 | 0.19 | 0.04 | 587 | 0.24 | − 5.79 | 7.40 | 1.17 | |
| Złoty Stok | S-SL | 0.4–3.9 | 5.3–7.8 | 0.06 | 41.0 | 4.90 | 0.70 | 0.13 | 36.1 | 1.00 | − 3.50 | 5.92 | 0.04 | |
| Copper industry | Legnica Cu smelter | LS-SiL | 0.8–2.7 | 4.9–6.8 | 0.05 | 5.66 | 2.59 | 3.36 | 0.11 | 46.3 | 18.1 | − 4.51 | 2.31 | 1.56 |
| Głogów Cu smelter | LS-SL | 1.5–2.9 | 5.3–7.1 | 0.04 | 5.12 | 2.05 | 0.98 | 0.33 | 52.7 | 8.29 | − 4.82 | 2.35 | − 0.04 | |
| Tailings impoundments | S-C | 0.3–1.1 | 7.5–8.0 | 0.005 | 0.51 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 3.57 | 0.58 | − 5.86 | 0.83 | − 2.95 | |
| Shooting range | Wrocław | S-LS | 0.1–5.8 | 5.6–7.2 | 0.14 | 93.4 | 17.0 | 4.16 | 0.93 | 578 | 28.4 | − 0.98 | 8.36 | 3.35 |
| Oleśnica | S-LS | 0.1–0.3 | 7.4–8.0 | 0.32 | 40.1 | 10.7 | 3.33 | 2.45 | 649 | 27.7 | 0.15 | 7.14 | 3.55 | |
| Landfills | Swojczyce | SL-L | 1.4–3.2 | 5.1–6.8 | 0.03 | 1.47 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 4.56 | 0.12 | − 4.70 | 1.12 | − 2.55 |
| Ziębicka | LS-C | 1.3–3.9 | 4.2–7.0 | 0.02 | 4.88 | 0.87 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 8.13 | 0.54 | − 3.37 | 2.85 | − 2.34 | |
| Nowa Wieś Legnicka | S-SL | 0.4–3.7 | 5.3–6.6 | 0.70 | 2.39 | 1.55 | 1.21 | 0.46 | 36.8 | 18.6 | − 4.49 | 1.25 | − 1.62 | |
aS sand, LS loamy sand, SL sandy loam, L loam, SiL silt loam, C clay
Fig. 3As and Sb co-occurrence in various types of deposits
Fig. 4Sb speciation in soils determined in sequential extraction. Fractions: 1. non-specifically sorbed (easily soluble), 2. specifically sorbed, 3. bound to amorphous and poorly-crystalline hydrous oxides of Fe and Al, 4. bound to well-crystalline hydrous oxides of Fe and Al, 5. residual