| Literature DB >> 30643387 |
Tarek A Ahmed1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This work aimed to develop a new solid dosage formulation of vinpocetine (VPN) in the form of buccal freeze-dried pullulan-based tablets (lyoplant-tabs) loaded with physically modified drug binary system.Entities:
Keywords: binary system; buccal tablets; clinical pharmacokinetics; freeze-drying; permeation; vinpocetin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30643387 PMCID: PMC6312694 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S189105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Aqueous solubility and solubility enhancement of vinpocetine in the prepared solid dispersions
| Polymer used | Drug:polymer ratio | Vinpocetin solubility (μg/mL) | Solubility enhancement ratio | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solvent evaporation | Lyophilization | Solvent evaporation | Lyophilization | ||
| PVP-K25 | 1:1 | 186.42 | 2,014.61 | 80.70 | 872.13 |
| 1:2 | 340.03 | 2,249.39 | 147.19 | 973.76 | |
| 1:4 | 841.35 | 2,594.27 | 364.22 | 1,123.06 | |
| PVP-K30 | 1:1 | 425.58 | 2,063.83 | 184.23 | 893.43 |
| 1:2 | 945.86 | 2,312.37 | 409.46 | 1,001.02 | |
| 1:4 | 1,089.24 | 2,567.55 | 471.53 | 1,111.49 | |
| PVP-K90 | 1:1 | 49.82 | 2,102.82 | 21.56 | 910.31 |
| 1:2 | 91.94 | 2,176.18 | 39.80 | 942.07 | |
| 1:4 | 142.34 | 2,414.98 | 61.62 | 1,045.44 | |
| PVP-VA64 | 1:1 | 684.69 | 1,708.62 | 296.40 | 739.66 |
| 1:2 | 1,034.39 | 2,322.44 | 447.79 | 1,005.38 | |
| 1:4 | 1,773.26 | 2,707.50 | 767.64 | 1,172.08 | |
| PVP-PXL10 | 1:1 | 31.78 | 1,774.59 | 13.75 | 768.22 |
| 1:2 | 157.75 | 1,874.25 | 68.29 | 811.36 | |
| 1:4 | 470.32 | 2,020.30 | 203.60 | 874.59 | |
| PVP-PXLUSP 32 | 1:1 | 12.62 | 1,210.07 | 5.46 | 523.84 |
| 1:2 | 16.17 | 1,349.70 | 6.99 | 584.28 | |
| 1:4 | 182.54 | 2,047.38 | 79.02 | 886.31 | |
| (PVPK25:PVP K30:PVP-VA64) (1:1:1) | 1:4 | 1,780.99 | 2,712.82 | 770.99 | 1,174.38 |
| Vinpocetine aqueous solubility | 2.31 | – | – | ||
Abbreviation: PVP, polyvinyl pyrrolidone.
Composition of the lyoplant-tab formulations along with the observed, fitted values and statistical ANOVA of the studied responses Y1 and Y2
| Run | X1 (%) | X2 (%) | Y1 (%) | Y2 (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Observed | Fitted | Observed | Fitted | |||
|
| ||||||
| 1 | 15 | 5 | 67.68±2.63 | 65.58 | 67.72±5.68 | 72.40 |
| 2 | 5 | 4 | 76.64±1.99 | 76.89 | 92.67±2.17 | 101.48 |
| 3 | 10 | 6 | 92.24±7.98 | 91.35 | 90.04±7.38 | 96.94 |
| 4 | 10 | 4 | 77.97±3.99 | 76.53 | 77.08±8.29 | 66.15 |
| 5 | 15 | 4 | 67.35±4.49 | 68.54 | 57.85±7.34 | 59.97 |
| 6 | 5 | 5 | 80.96±5.99 | 80.73 | 134.26±7.77 | 125.56 |
| 7 | 15 | 6 | 75.65±3.58 | 76.56 | 85.90±10.73 | 79.10 |
| 8 | 5 | 6 | 98.54±2.63 | 98.51 | 144.03±12.5 | 143.92 |
| 9 | 10 | 5 | 74.65±1.72 | 76.97 | 80.39±8.17 | 84.41 |
| X1 | -15.15 | 68.80 | 0.0037 | -53.1633 | 31.10 | 0.0114 |
| X2 | 14.82 | 65.84 | 0.0039 | 30.79 | 10.43 | 0.0482 |
| X1X1 | -7.63 | 5.82 | 0.0948 | 29.1367 | 3.11 | 0.1758 |
| X1X2 | -6.80 | 9.24 | 0.0559 | -11.655 | 1.00 | 0.3918 |
| X2X2 | 13.94 | 19.40 | 0.0217 | -5.72333 | 0.12 | 0.7518 |
| 98.26% | 93.85% | |||||
| Adj. | 95.35% | 83.59% | ||||
Abbreviations: X1, aqueous pullulan solution; X2, plasdone XL; Y1, cumulative drug release; Y2, wetting index.
Figure 1Phase solubility study diagram of VPN in aqueous solution of PVP-VA64 (A), and dissolution profile of VPN solid dispersion and pure drug (B).
Abbreviations: PVP-VA64, polyvinyl pyrrolidone vinyl acetate; VPN, vinpocetine.
Figure 2Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms of vinpocetine, polyvinyl pyrrolidone vinyl acetate, and lyophilized binary mixture.
Figure 3Fourier transform infrared spectra of vinpocetine, polyvinyl pyrrolidone vinyl acetate, and lyophilized binary mixture.
Figure 4X-ray powder diffraction patterns of pure vinpocetine and lyophilized binary mixture.
Quality attributes of the prepared pullulan-tabs formulations
| Run | Weight (mg) | Thickness (mm) | Friability (%) | Wetting time (minutes) | Drug content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| 1 | 162.38±3.11 | 4.32±0.12 | 0.560 | 14.06±0.21 | 98.04±0.34 |
| 2 | 108.05±1.94 | 4.02±0.13 | 0.143 | 4.69±0.13 | 99.34±0.11 |
| 3 | 138.77±3.50 | 4.28±0.09 | 0.417 | 6.04±1.00 | 101.03±0.28 |
| 4 | 133.92±5.36 | 4.15±0.18 | 0.098 | 7.53±0.42 | 102.4±0.05 |
| 5 | 162.29±1.82 | 4.62±0.15 | 0.095 | 14.51±1.57 | 102.9±0.21 |
| 6 | 114.62±2.52 | 4.13±0.13 | 0.139 | 4.43±0.21 | 98.60±0.41 |
| 7 | 167.03±6.07 | 4.91±0.42 | 0.046 | 8.75±0.46 | 99.62±0.17 |
| 8 | 116.88±4.96 | 3.93±0.20 | 0.066 | 4.33±0.22 | 98.06±0.33 |
| 9 | 134.28±4.17 | 4.20±0.19 | 0.232 | 8.83±0.80 | 100.61±0.05 |
Figure 5Standardized Pareto charts and estimated response surface plots for the effect of the studied factors on Y1 and Y2.
Figure 6Plasma concentration–time curves for VPN after oral administration of commercial drug product and buccal formulations to human volunteers.
Note: $Indicates significant difference (P<0.05) between groups I and II; *Indicates significant difference (P<0.05) between groups I and III; and #indicates significant difference (P<0.05) between groups II and III.
Abbreviation: VPN, vinpocetine.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of the oral commercial and buccal vinpocetine tablets
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Group I (test group) | Group II (positive control group) | Group III (reference group) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Cmax (ng/mL) | 9.658±1.074 | 6.672±1.234 | 5.050±0.239 |
| Tmax (hours) | 1.000±0.000 | 1.250±0.000 | 2.500±0.000 |
| Kabs (h−1) | 1.404±0.020 | 1.165±0.102 | 0.806±0.019 |
| t(½) abs (hours) | 0.494±0.007 | 0.596±0.051 | 0.860±0.021 |
| Kelm (h−1) | 0.444±0.039 | 0.406±0.104 | 0.565±0.001 |
| t(½) elm (hours) | 1.569±0.138 | 1.774±0.396 | 1.227±0.001 |
| Vd (L) | 0.456±0.026 | 0.624±0.071 | 0.655±0.015 |
| TCR (mL/min) | 3.364±0.210 | 4.157±0.517 | 6.163±0.151 |
| AUC0-last (ng h/mL) | 30.319±1.691 | 24.575±0.278 | 18.992±0.729 |
| AUMC0-last (ng h2/mL) | 108.024±6.355 | 90.946±1.696 | 76.703±3.551 |
| MRT (hours) | 3.563±0.040 | 3.701±0.059 | 4.038±0.032 |
Notes: Group I (test group) was given the optimized lyoplant-tabs formulation. Group II (positive control group) was administered the buccal tablets containing pure drug. Group III (reference group) was given the commercial vinpocetine tablets.
Abbreviations: AUC0-last, area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to the last measurable drug concentration; AUMC0-last, area under the moment curve; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Kabs, the apparent first-order absorption rate constant; Kelm, the apparent first-order elimination rate constant; MRT, mean residence time; TCR, total clearance rate; Tmax, time point of maximum plasma concentration; Vd, apparent volume of distribution; t½ abs, the absorption half-life; t½ elm, the elimination half-life.